#2 Jordan De Goey

Sicks Bux · Post by **Sicks Bux** » Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:21 pm

doriswilgus wrote:That’s reading an awful lot into Channel 7’s decision not to include him in a highlights package ^.The A.F.L set the precedent when they allowed Daw and Milne to play when they were facing the far more serious charge of rape.They could hardly ban DeGoey now for something that may not lead to a conviction or even go to court.The only reason the Twitterverse was outraged by DeGoey playing the other night was because he helped us win the game.If he had done nothing in the game and we’d lost,people wouldn’t have cared whether he played or not.It just shows you the hypocrisy of your average football fan.

Worse still is that a lot of toxic opposition supporters, whilst displaying their faux outrage, would secretly be delighted about this and would be hoping that the alleged incident is proven to have occurred.

Post by **David** » Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:30 pm

What'sinaname · Post by **What'sinaname** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:58 pm

Bunnings Karen had the right idea.

We should have gone the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defence.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

That is if I assume correctly that DeGoey rubbed his penal up against a woman.

shawthing · Post by **shawthing** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:54 pm

Piesnchess · Post by **Piesnchess** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:02 pm

What'sinaname wrote:Bunnings Karen had the right idea.

We should have gone the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defence.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

That is if I assume correctly that DeGoey rubbed his penal up against a woman.

You totally lost me as soon as you mentioned Karen from Bunnings.

K · Post by K » Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:03 pm

Mr Miyagi · Post by **Mr Miyagi** » Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:07 pm

Mr Miyagi · Post by **Mr Miyagi** » Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:18 pm

Anyway, really frustrating it’s been pushed back to April next year. Bloody hell. Expected though with the covid backlog. Maybe the people who made the decision hate Collingwood and saw an opportunity to screw up our trade/draft period and contract negotiations? This really throws a spanner in Treloar’s situation too.

Ronnie McKeowns boots · Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:37 pm

Hmmm, what helpful timing ....

Post by **think positive** » Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:38 pm

Sicks Bux · Post by **Sicks Bux** » Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:49 pm

Strange term indecent assault. Indecent assault? As opposed to decent assault, like the time Chris Tarrant beat up that germ Mark Johnson at a nightclub.

Lazza · Post by **Lazza** » Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:56 pm

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Hmmm, what helpful timing ....

Exactly

Post by **David** » Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:40 pm

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that anti-Collingwood animus from the AFL has nothing whatsoever to do with this adjournment. Unless you think the AFL somehow have jurisdiction over the courts?

K · Post by K » Sun Nov 01, 2020 9:41 am

Many cases have been adjourned in this pandemic.

Post by **David** » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:35 am

Who knows, maybe the pandemic was all a ploy to get one over the Pies too.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

#2 Jordan De Goey