Post Match. Pies dumped by Eagles. All comments, please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
slangman
Posts: 2723
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 21 times

Post by slangman »

Darcy Moore is our best KPF so to insist on him playing back is creating the problem that we have struggled with for a while and that is kicking goals.
For the first time in quite a while I felt like we were in with a chance with 10 min to go with Moore up forward as a target.
Compare this with Cox as a target. Games were over as soon as we go more than three goals behind.

Madgen could’ve easily been switched back to defence once Howe went down instead of leaving him on the wing with Maynard left to play as a tall defender.

Moore lead out many times and wasn’t used by the incoming kick but this will be the change that we need. Our players mindset has been stuck on bombing the ball to the top of the goal square. Moore up forward working hard and presenting with force them to lower their eyes....which they have not been programmed to do with lazier forwards like Cox.
- Side By Side -
Tanuki
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 5:23 pm

Post by Tanuki »

Kelly has to be reported for that 'bump', seriously, how can escape a review?
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7704
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 97 times
Been liked: 184 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

Tanuki wrote:Kelly has to be reported for that 'bump', seriously, how can escape a review?
You’re kidding, he hasn’t been cited?! He had one intention, to hurt JDG who had his arms pinned and couldn’t protect himself. Kelly was jumping into players on the ground, ignoring the ball and just wanting to hurt the player, all night too.
User avatar
robevpau1
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:37 am

Post by robevpau1 »

slangman wrote:
Moore lead out many times and wasn’t used by the incoming kick but this will be the change that we need. Our players mindset has been stuck on bombing the ball to the top of the goal square. Moore up forward working hard and presenting with force them to lower their eyes....which they have not been programmed to do with lazier forwards like Cox.
Exactly - what I have been saying for a while - create space - encourage leads - lower eyes - select targets. May take a while to re-educate but must persevere with changing our delivery tactics.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40237
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 339 times
Been liked: 103 times

Post by think positive »

RudeBoy wrote:I was devastated by the injuries to Howe and JDG, which probably cost us the game. Nevertheless, I thought the whole team played well for most of the game.

I hope we stick with Moore at full forward. It will take a while for he and the team to adjust to a new set up, but he is so much more agile and effective than the slow moving Cox. Time to bring in Kelly next week to play in defence. I'd also play Murphy there and move Quaynor into the midfield, where we are lacking a strong, fast one-grab player.

I remain a critic of Callum Brown, who buzzes around a lot but is rarely effective. I'm also a little disappointed in the output from Daicos. He needs to get his hands on the pill more. Sier did not do much, but we have to persevere with him.

We have a couple of beauties in McCreery and Macrae.

The season is shot, so lets use it to blood a bunch of youngsters, so they can hit the ground running next year.
spot on pillar to post

Especially Moire, he’s literally a born FF
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40237
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 339 times
Been liked: 103 times

Post by think positive »

David wrote:
Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote:
David wrote:Thomas and Brown both stood up and did well tonight... Putting Moore up forward was a shockingly bad decision
Que?
I thought both were really good in patches; Thomas in particular was a real presence in the contests. Both get a tick from me.

If you think Moore up forward was a good idea, not sure what to tell you. Not against experimenting when the situation calls for it, but it was the wrong game to try it and the mistake was compounded by Buckley’s refusal to change things up when we lost Howe and our defence were getting towelled up.
Disagree completely, no point winning defence if you have no goal kickers, hesgouldgave mover other players to defence, quite frankly in my mind Moore isn’t our best defence p,Ayer, he is our best and probably only genuine KPP, forward or back, we have other ‘good’ defensive players, but we need Moore forward. That’s where his dollars should be earned, now he has learnt to defend himself.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34875
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Why doesn't the same argument apply for Murphy? Why play the Irish rookie instead of the high draft pick? Or both?
I was simply responding to the posters speculating about who gets dropped for Moore to go back to defence. It seems a non-question when the Coach stated publicly last night that Moore will play forward again.
slangman
Posts: 2723
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 21 times

Post by slangman »

How about Cameron being transformed into a KPD in the same way that Liam Jones has done.
He has the attributes to at least be more than serviceable.
At 200cm and athletic for his size, he would be quite a good defender imho.
Worth a go.
- Side By Side -
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34875
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

He's slower than a coach. It'd be like changing your rucks at FB.
User avatar
warburton lad
Posts: 2786
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:47 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 60 times

Post by warburton lad »

Pies4shaw wrote:He's slower than a coach. It'd be like changing your rucks at FB.
Agreed- If only we had held onto Keeffe and let Thomas adrift...
Firm in the belief that number 17 flag is only months away...
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

Moore's problem is that he struggles to find the ball when he's in the forward line, and can go long times without a touch. He is also outbodied by big body defenders, not as badly as Cox, but still. When back he can intercept, and run off, as forwards generally aren't defensively minded against their opponents, that changes when he's forward as he's always got someone hanging off him. Can we afford him being marooned at FF game after game as our potatoes fire in all manner of disposals aimed in his general direction? dunno. Maybe get Cox in there as well and play Moore, Cox and Checkers, and spread them out... that would be akin to the Eagles three tall setup, in height, anyway.
Get back on top.
Pies2016
Posts: 6868
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 174 times

Post by Pies2016 »

Here’s a couple really left field ideas -

Why not play Kelly as key defender where he had an excellent U18 championship, including two great break even battles with Allen and Lukosuis.
You could also trial Miochek as a key defender where he made his name as one of the very best key defenders in the VFL
Then you could leave Moore in the forward line for a few more weeks before some of us on here stamp his papers after only one week in the position.
There wouldn’t be many who could say they were completely comfortable in their new job after three hours of doing it.
Moore was also played as a forward in U18s and in his first couple years at the club, so it’s not like the idea of leaving him there for a few weeks should come as a huge surprise.
Keane needs to be played for a few more weeks before any judgement in 2021 is passed on him. He made a few mistakes last night but some where purely nerves, as opposed to not good enough. I’m not even sure what his position is but he needs to play with the belief his position is safe and not that he’s only one bad kick away from being dropped again.
Ruscoe was also a defender as a junior, so it’s not like we are short of players who grew up learning the position.

The same people keep trotting out the old “ definition of insanity “ saying every time they want to be heard. And yet, the moment the coaching panel try something new, it’s an outright failure after a three hour trial
slangman
Posts: 2723
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 21 times

Post by slangman »

Pies2016 wrote:Here’s a couple really left field ideas -

Why not play Kelly as key defender where he had an excellent U18 championship, including two great break even battles with Allen and Lukosuis..
Kelly is playing at CHB in the VFL today.
- Side By Side -
User avatar
shawthing
Posts: 2919
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 97 times

Post by shawthing »

slangman wrote:So three weeks ago we had a relatively healthy list....

Cue

3.

2.

1.

GO

Elliott long term
Adams long term
Howe long term
JDG??

Why does this happen most years?
Because like the Dallas Cowboys there's a black cat running around this franchise. Or Buckley is a Jonah. Has he ever won a flag at any level of footy?
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

warburton lad wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:He's slower than a coach. It'd be like changing your rucks at FB.
Agreed- If only we had held onto Keeffe and let Thomas adrift...
Why? I thought we should’ve held onto both: our good first qtr last night was due in part to Thomas (amongst others) I thought.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Post Reply