Post Match. Pies win for Bucks. All comments, please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
Posts: 2539
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
Location: Sevilla, Spain
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 5 times

Post by Rd10.1998_11.1#36 »

BazBoy wrote:De Goey offered a one week ban for rough conduct on Oliver
Cool, he can have the bye off :D
User avatar
KenH
Posts: 1761
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:29 pm

Post by KenH »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Disagree Ken, thats as hard as you can get a bloke for a week nowadays
Have another look at it Ronnie, I really don't think he connected?
Cheers big ears
Alex
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:10 pm

Post by Alex »

Pies4shaw wrote:Collingwood won the clearances by 10, 34 to 24. They won centre clearances 14 to 9 (and I think they won 4 of the 5 in the last quarter) and stoppage clearances 20 to 15.

Clearances - De Goey 6, Crisp, Pendlebury and Sidebottom 5, Daicos 3.

Centre clearances - De Goey 5, Sidebottom 3, Pendlebury 2 and 5 others 1 each.
This without Adams and even Grundy is very impressive.

We played fantastically, Pendles was great, best game this year for him, the same to De Goey, a shame that he could miss next game, hopefully they can continue on this form, especially De Goey. Maynard had his best game for the season which has still been a good one for him, he has been a reliable lockdown defender for us this year but he was really damaging today offensively. The future is exciting and we still need to add Nick Daicos to this young core.

Just to add, great game from Lynch. My perspective on him has done a complete 180 turn. I thought he should have been delisted last year, and even dropped for this match, but he showed that he has some talent as a tap ruckman, which is really the only flaw in Grundy's game. We should keep him and trade Cox this trade period I think.
"That was out-of-bounds"
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22074
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 73 times

Post by RudeBoy »

The club should contest De Goey's charge. It's clear that Jordy just managed to pull out of fully connecting Oliver, which is why Oliver got straight up.
slangman
Posts: 2702
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by slangman »

Tim Kelly concussed JDG with a hip to the head and got off.
Can’t see why De Goey was given a week.
- Side By Side -
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 14 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

Good Point

I saw it briefly.. and note.. this is what I perceived before my wife grabbed my attention... else I was going to Die!

DeGoey lined him up and was going to do a Brereton to him. Didn't happen, but I don't think the AFL likes players attempting to take other players out.
Swanny2011
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:27 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Swanny2011 »

slangman wrote: Can’t see why De Goey was given a week.
De Goey ran passed the ball deliberately to take out the player with a hip an shoulder. De Goey hit him with significant force. Sorry but generally any player that does that these days will get suspended.
I think this is an open and shut case and it will be pointless appealing.

The interesting case will be the Mckay case.
BazBoy
Posts: 11038
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 29 times

Post by BazBoy »

I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Swanny2011 wrote:
slangman wrote: Can’t see why De Goey was given a week.
De Goey ran passed the ball deliberately to take out the player with a hip an shoulder. De Goey hit him with significant force. Sorry but generally any player that does that these days will get suspended.
I think this is an open and shut case and it will be pointless appealing.

The interesting case will be the Mckay case.
Correct
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

KenH wrote:
Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Disagree Ken, thats as hard as you can get a bloke for a week nowadays
Have another look at it Ronnie, I really don't think he connected?
But even the slightest of contact, given the aggressive go past the ball nature of the bump, was going to get a week....as for its effect, have a look at old mates face when he gets up, absolutely shat himself, and was hearing footsteps for the rest of the game....well worth a week
BazBoy
Posts: 11038
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 29 times

Post by BazBoy »

That’s what I said. Maybe overzealous and not in duty of care area

Attack the ball carrier fiercely and constantly then the side has doubts as to

“am I gunna get driven into the deck and regular-it’s gunna hurt”

We had them
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
User avatar
i hate carlton
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 8:42 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by i hate carlton »

Disgraceful decision - the club should appeal.
___________________

He's kicking pineapples!

My favourite nicks thread (Laugh at Carlscum): http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopi ... sc&start=0
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

i hate carlton wrote:Disgraceful decision - the club should appeal.
They Haven't

Oliver is a Flopper
I am Da Man
BazBoy
Posts: 11038
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 29 times

Post by BazBoy »

I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
User avatar
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
Posts: 2539
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
Location: Sevilla, Spain
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 5 times

Post by Rd10.1998_11.1#36 »

Dave The Man wrote:Oliver is a Flopper
They don't call him Clayton Fallover for nothing
Post Reply