#36 Brayden Sier
Moderator: bbmods
- piedys
- Posts: 13418
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Nah, I'm not on board with delisting Sier; totally unnecessary.jackcass wrote:Good luck to Bear. Will remain an unfulfilled talent from my perspective. Hopefully he gets another chance elsewhere, maybe even our VFL squad.
https://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/1 ... nd-rantall
We haven't enough strong bodied mids on the list, even allowing for Lippy.
He deserved at least one year under McFly to see if he could recapture the form which brought him to senior selection in 2018.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
Better off selecting Constable as a DFA replacement for Sier. Similar player but more committed to the cause and squeezed out due to depth at cats. Also given Taylor Adams year by year propensity to miss 5-7 games with leg issues, may be valuable in protecting the less hardened bodies of our youth.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
I sympathise with your view Dyso old son, but in all honesty, Sier has had 5 yrs to show that he is committed enough to become an AFL player. Macrae, Poulter, McCreery, Henry and Bianco showed more commitment in one year than the Bear did in 5yrs. It's a shame, but that's how it is.piedys wrote:Nah, I'm not on board with delisting Sier; totally unnecessary.jackcass wrote:Good luck to Bear. Will remain an unfulfilled talent from my perspective. Hopefully he gets another chance elsewhere, maybe even our VFL squad.
https://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/1 ... nd-rantall
We haven't enough strong bodied mids on the list, even allowing for Lippy.
He deserved at least one year under McFly to see if he could recapture the form which brought him to senior selection in 2018.
- think positive
- Posts: 40237
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 339 times
- Been liked: 103 times
- magpieazza
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:27 am
- Location: Griffith N.S.W
- Rd10.1998_11.1#36
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
- Location: Sevilla, Spain
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 5 times
- piedys
- Posts: 13418
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 100 times
I know what you are saying, but...MatthewBoydFanClub wrote:So you reward a player with another contract when he hasn’t done anything in the last two years?
Let's at least acknowledge there have been much fewer VFL games played from 2020-2021, for obvious reasons.
So I think this is the variable where I give him the benefit of the doubt - how was he suppose to improve his tank when he couldn't run the vehicle?
All VFL players in that boat; thrown to the wolves at AFL level for last two seasons due to tight scheduling in 2020, and expected to step up to AFL standard without being able to grind out their fitness in the reserves.
And you can only amass so much fitness at training, the rest needs to be on the field at either level, week in week out.
So yes, I thought a one year contract was going to happen for him, based on his size, ability, and that word - potential.
I expected McFly to sit him down and say 2022 is your make or break year.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
-
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm
- Lazza
- Posts: 12836
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
The usual thing where perceived potential does not match actual achievement. Harsh to blame Hine for Sier being a lazy kid who wasn’t prepared to put in the work needed to play at AFL level. More fool Sier.
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!