OK, I've skim read the proposed legislation. I don't like it.
Neither does the president of the Victorian bar
The president of the Victorian Bar has slammed the state’s new pandemic legislation as “appalling” and claims the government “grossly misrepresented” its consultation with the barristers’ peak body.
Christopher Blanden, QC, said the new laws, designed to replace sweeping state of emergency powers, would give the Premier unprecedented power with little to no checks and balances.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/vict ... 593n8.html
Here's the deal as I understand it. The legislation gives the Premier the power to make a pandemic declaration in some pretty flimsy circumstances. All they have to do is table the reasons. So at least there is some public scrutiny but nothing they can't spin their way through.
Once that Pandemic declaration is made, the Health Minister can make orders setting out public health measures and restrictions to protect public health, including increased fines and detention orders. All they have to do is publish reasons for them.
Now, consider this. Andrews is being quoted in media as saying that the restrictions on unvaccinated people (going to pubs, sport, cafes etc) will continue right through 2022.
To do that, he would have to make a pandemic declaration right through 2022 for the Health Minister to have the power to make those orders.
From the linked article.
This is a bill that fundamentally interferes with the rights of citizens in some very basic ways. It abrogates the privilege against self-incrimination and you’ve got detention at the whim of the minister. It’s just appalling stuff.”
“Stasi police would have been more than happy with the range of powers if they were given it,” Mr Blanden told The Age. “It’s extraordinary.”
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.