i know 3 ladies who were pregnant when they gotr the jabs, check out my chrissy shots, 3 perfectly gorgeous adorable little boys!!stui magpie wrote:Their risk may be irrelevant to you but it might not be to them.Pies4shaw wrote:To the vaccine, I think you mean? Yes, of course. In terms of exercise of power, it is no different from sending an army off to war knowing that some of your soliders will be killed (save, of course, that chances are that way more of your soldiers will be killed since the point of a war seems to be to apply opposing lethal forces).roar wrote:Is it not true that a small - really small - percentage of people will have an adverse, and potentially deadly reaction to the virus? Can you then force someone to take that chance?
Speaking statistically, of course, we know that the chances of a dangerous reaction to the vaccine are a tiny fragment of the chances of a dangerous outcome if they get COVID, so that risk is irrelevant.
I'd love to see you explaining to an early 20's pregnant female terrified of what the vaccine might do to her baby that her risk is irrelevant and she has a moral obligation to get vaccinated to help protect you,
Good luck with that.
they got it because they were choosing to protect their babies, scared of what could happen if they got covid while pregnant.
i still think that a lot of the hesitancy was caused by the almighty **** that AZ was when it was introduced, changing rules every second day is scary.
and there are an awful lot of folk who think doctor google is really concerned about their welfare!