Pay increases & perks.
Moderator: bbmods
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
I'm sure that the majority of people earning less than 6 figures would take issue with $450k being less than a living wage, but people in the public service earn more.
Still, it's not bad for people who have no demonstrable skills other than winning a popularity contest. Politicians, the original reality TV stars, predating TV.
Still, it's not bad for people who have no demonstrable skills other than winning a popularity contest. Politicians, the original reality TV stars, predating TV.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- David
- Posts: 50659
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 76 times
Don't know about Australian politicians, but it's not as if the president of the US needs to worry about paying for accommodation, or food, or transport. Indeed, I'd be interested to know what, if anything, comes out of their own pocket.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Day to day expenses would be covered, but they would still own property that they lived in before going to the White House which would attract property taxes and insurance, Obama had young kids so there's school or uni fees, clothes, all the stuff you have to have for kids.
Again, it would be similar to the Prime Minister. Your mortgage doesn't go away just because you temporarily reside elsewhere.
Again, it would be similar to the Prime Minister. Your mortgage doesn't go away just because you temporarily reside elsewhere.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Skids
- Posts: 9937
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 44 times
Agree totally. We really do get what we pay for.Pies4shaw wrote:It's not much for what they do.
Supervisor level workers in mining are on circa $250k-$280k. You're talking late 20 - mid 30 year olds, more and more females filling the roles too.
Superintendent level are circa $325k+
A Mine Manager with around 6-8 area managers under him/her would be paid well above what our PM gets paid.
A recently retired CEO for a major mining company, received a Bentley as a xmas bonus a few years ago.
Don't count the days, make the days count.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Hadn't really thought about it. Since you ask, though, I suspect they'd probably still be mostly lawyers, as they seem to be now - but at least you wouldn't be automatically excluding all the ones who are competent at what they do but wouldn't countenance the present massive pay cut. Reflecting on Skids' post, we're probably not attracting too many capable managers, either, from any field.