#2 Jordan De Goey

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20051
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 20 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Allegedly will miss this week too
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
dalyc
Posts: 2881
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:58 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by dalyc »

Fwiw, I think we’ve lost him. I think he believes he’s been poorly served by the leadership group and the Club.

Because he’s a restricted FA, I think we can force trade situation rather than accept the compensation.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40200
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 240 times
Been liked: 90 times

Post by think positive »

What'sinaname wrote:Allegedly will miss this week too
Where did you hear that? I would have thought it would be the perfect opportunity to come back
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
BazBoy
Posts: 11056
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 37 times

Post by BazBoy »

I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Pies2016
Posts: 6775
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by Pies2016 »

dalyc wrote:Fwiw, I think we’ve lost him. I think he believes he’s been poorly served by the leadership group and the Club.

Because he’s a restricted FA, I think we can force trade situation rather than accept the compensation.
You can’t “ force “ a trade situation because the whole idea of free agency is to put the power in the players hands so as to afford him the opportunity to maximise his earning potential during a relatively small employment window. This premise applies to both restricted F As and unrestricted F As.
Theres no point to the club seeking a trade because the return on the trade would be less than the compo pick. That’s simply because there is no need for any new suitor to facilitate a trade when Degoeys a free agent in the first place. Why give something away when they don’t have to. His destination club would just place the highest bid, Collingwood don’t or can’t match it and DeGoey accepts the terms of his new club. The AFL then determine our compo pick, likely between 9 - 13ish ( that’s based on probable ladder position and size of contract )
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Pick 9 - 13?

Where do we sign??!!!

Our pick 10ish or wherever we finish
AFL’s pick 9ish for the compo for DeGoey
Adelaides pick 6ish for Grundy.

Rebuild sorted. And the team isn’t THAT compromised considering what we have achieved without Grundy and DeGoey.

Do it.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Pies2016
Posts: 6775
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by Pies2016 »

burnsy17 wrote:Pick 9 - 13?

Where do we sign??!!!

Our pick 10ish or wherever we finish
AFL’s pick 9ish for the compo for DeGoey
Adelaides pick 6ish for Grundy.

Rebuild sorted. And the team isn’t THAT compromised considering what we have achieved without Grundy and DeGoey.

Do it.
It does sound simple when you say it quickly. We also need to remember, should Collingwood bring a free agent into the club, then we automatically forfeit our DeGoey compo pick.
The other consideration we can’t lose sight of whenever people talk about trading Grundy, is that he is obviously under contract. As long as contracts remain in the AFL, it will forever take three different party’s to ALL totally agree before any player goes anywhere ( and I know you get this but I’m convinced some don’t ) All of Grundy, the parent club and the destination club all have to be well and truly in total agreement before Grundy would be swapping clubs. I’m not convinced that will be happening anytime soon.
Meredith1965
Posts: 529
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:38 pm

Post by Meredith1965 »

burnsy17 wrote:Pick 9 - 13?

Where do we sign??!!!

Our pick 10ish or wherever we finish
AFL’s pick 9ish for the compo for DeGoey
Adelaides pick 6ish for Grundy.

Rebuild sorted. And the team isn’t THAT compromised considering what we have achieved without Grundy and DeGoey.

Do it.
Scharenberg and Freeman went at 6 and 10 (and with those picks went our 2018 flag). It’s a lottery.
User avatar
3rd degree
Posts: 14200
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
Location: John Wren's tote
Contact:

Post by 3rd degree »

What'sinaname wrote:Allegedly will miss this week too
Allegedly is exactly that, you allegedly support our club.
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".

www.facebook/the hybernators
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40200
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 240 times
Been liked: 90 times

Post by think positive »

I don’t think it sounds good! I want Grundy back, I want to see how he goes with the much improved Cox and Darcy. And I want DeGoey back too, with a new attitude. A club first I am worth it attitude. I haven’t given up on him.

Nothing beats a good stick it up em attitude.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12390
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 21 times

Post by eddiesmith »

burnsy17 wrote:Pick 9 - 13?

Where do we sign??!!!

Our pick 10ish or wherever we finish
AFL’s pick 9ish for the compo for DeGoey
Adelaides pick 6ish for Grundy.

Rebuild sorted. And the team isn’t THAT compromised considering what we have achieved without Grundy and DeGoey.

Do it.
We lost to West Coast and barely beat GWS without DeGoey...
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

The reason Cameron has improved is because there’s been no Grundy!

When Grundy is back, he’ll take first ruck and Cameron goes back to FF….

That’s the problem.

Cameron is only any good as a first ruck.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40200
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 240 times
Been liked: 90 times

Post by think positive »

Who knows his confidence might have built, and god knows we need a nice tall marking FF
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

burnsy17 wrote:The reason Cameron has improved is because there’s been no Grundy!

When Grundy is back, he’ll take first ruck and Cameron goes back to FF….

That’s the problem.

Cameron is only any good as a first ruck.
The most luxurious problem a club has ever had, surely: https://magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.p ... 26#2102926
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
David
Posts: 50575
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 46 times

Post by David »

eddiesmith wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:And the team isn’t THAT compromised considering what we have achieved without Grundy and DeGoey.
We lost to West Coast and barely beat GWS without DeGoey...
Exactly. We haven't, in fact, achieved anything whatsoever without him. And the team will clearly be poorer for his absence.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Post Reply