Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player discussion

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
Return of the baldfacts
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:46 pm

Post by Return of the baldfacts »

SwansWay wrote:I was initially against it but I've had my mind changed. He's not as much of a target for the Brisbane mids when you've got those other talls and Charlie Cameron commanding the ball. He'd probably be okay at Collingwood.

I don't think anybody needs to worry about him getting overs. The new guard at Collingwood don't throw godfather contracts willy nilly like Ned Guy used to.
Reported by John Ralph that the offer is $600K per year over 5 years. That is massive overs for a key forward who has not kicked more than 28 goals in any year.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

We've spent years bemoaning our lack of a premium tall forward target but I tell you what I'd settle for another key tall as good as Mihocek.
He may well sit one rung below the likes of a Hawkins, Lynch or McKay but he's still been a beauty and is arguably having his best season.
Question is however whether McStay has the capacity to be that player.
While he seemingly possesses some of the same building blocks that Mihocek has in terms of covering the ground well and being a capable mark, I remain to be convinced he's as good at scrapping goals from ground ball gathers or is the same high level competitive beast.

If we re-sign de Goey or can manage to gain McStay whilst retaining suitable compensation for de Goey should he leave then I'm open minded enough to give the guy a chance and see if he can flourish with greater responsibility / opportunity at Collingwood.
Losing de Goey however for nothing via F/A because we took on McStay wouldn't be an outcome that many Collingwood supporters would be enthused by as he's not in the same league as those currently available next season in a McKay or Curnow.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Pies2016 wrote:
Watched a player on the weekend
and thought he would look very good in black and white. Think Jamie Elliot Mk 2 but younger and with a nasty streak. Cam Zurhar ( ? ) He’s on that list and who wouldn’t want to get out of North. Reckon he would be fantastic addition with a decent mid field in front of him. Tough, goes hard, evasive and kicks goals. I hope he’s on our short list.
It took you till the weekend to realise this? :wink:

Zurhaar is a huge talent and the player I'd target if de Doey goes elsewhere.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Pies2016
Posts: 6868
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 174 times

Post by Pies2016 »

swoop42 wrote:
Pies2016 wrote:
Watched a player on the weekend
and thought he would look very good in black and white. Think Jamie Elliot Mk 2 but younger and with a nasty streak. Cam Zurhar ( ? ) He’s on that list and who wouldn’t want to get out of North. Reckon he would be fantastic addition with a decent mid field in front of him. Tough, goes hard, evasive and kicks goals. I hope he’s on our short list.
It took you till the weekend to realise this? :wink:

Zurhaar is a huge talent and the player I'd target if de Doey goes elsewhere.
Swoop, You gotta remember, nobody watches North these days.
Another rookie selection too. They’re out there.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54830
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by stui magpie »

Presti35 wrote:Im fine with going for mcstay, but the wage needs to be right
Darcy Cameron is already a better key forward than McStay, and he can ruck too. https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=C&fid2=C

If we get McStay, do we play 3 tall forwards with him, Checkers and Cameron with Grundy 1st ruck changing forward?

On limited sightings, I'd prefer Kreuger as Checkers partner with Cameron. Far more upside.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Return of the baldfacts
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:46 pm

Post by Return of the baldfacts »

The other knock on McStay according to Jonathon Brown is that Brisbane's talls are too nice. If this applies to McStay, then another cross against him.
Pies2016
Posts: 6868
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 174 times

Post by Pies2016 »

Return of the baldfacts wrote:The other knock on McStay according to Jonathon Brown is that Brisbane's talls are too nice. If this applies to McStay, then another cross against him.
We all want one of the King twins, Curnow or McKay ( although I wouldn’t say either of those come with a brutal, nasty streak either ) but you’re talking at around 1,000,000 > a year and a record breaking trade if free agency isn’t involved. When you put those numbers in context, I’m not sure McStay is getting overs. I’d suggest it’s close to market price for a key forward who continues to get a game in a good side every week ( and comes without a trade ) I’m not trying to sell him at all. I’m quite open minded about him coming to Collingwood or not because there really are so many directions we can go in during the upcoming trade period. But I am learning very quickly, to not be quick to pass early judgement on anything that involves G. Wright’s input.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40237
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 339 times
Been liked: 103 times

Post by think positive »

trust in McCrae!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

think positive wrote:trust in McCrae!
Even better McRae! :P
Last edited by swoop42 on Thu Jun 30, 2022 2:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Career comparison between Mihocek and McStay.

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=C&fid2=C

Current 2022 season comparison.

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=S&fid2=S

Mihocek 2019 season comparison vs McStay same age (2021)

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... fopt2=2021
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

I'm open minded enough to consider McStay could become Mihocek mark II and who wouldn't want two of him running around each week?

My biggest problem with obtaining McStay is the inevitable occurrence of good Collingwood people butchering his name and referring to him as McSatay on this board.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9545
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 37 times

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

A forward line with Checkers, Kruegs and McStay, one of the rucks resting forward and then Ginny and Beau at their feet would be quite intriguing, Your 4th best back better be able to play tall. That's even without Jamie or Ollie.
User avatar
mattdally
Posts: 1479
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 10 times
Contact:

Post by mattdally »

Available trade target - GWS' Tanner Bruhn.
Liked a few of his games this year. Goal kicker, hard at it. Would compliment our mids. He's an in and under.

1st round pick in 2020 - no deal yet - Victorians.
Pies2016
Posts: 6868
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 174 times

Post by Pies2016 »

WhyPhilWhy? wrote:A forward line with Checkers, Kruegs and McStay, one of the rucks resting forward and then Ginny and Beau at their feet would be quite intriguing, Your 4th best back better be able to play tall. That's even without Jamie or Ollie.
If you add Cameron into the mix of Krueger, McStay and Checkers, it would make some sense if either Krueger or McStay were trialled in the back line during the off season. Both have played as defenders in their early days and generally it’s easier to make it as a key defender rather than a key forward.
There’s so many wild cards on our list we still haven’t unwrapped with Dean, Johnson, Carmichael and Krueger. If we knew enough that Dean and Krueger were going to step up, then McStay would almost be superfluous to our immediate needs. Like I have said previously, it’s going to be an exciting trade / draft period
Return of the baldfacts
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:46 pm

Post by Return of the baldfacts »

WhyPhilWhy? wrote:A forward line with Checkers, Kruegs and McStay, one of the rucks resting forward and then Ginny and Beau at their feet would be quite intriguing, Your 4th best back better be able to play tall. That's even without Jamie or Ollie.
That forward line would be far too top heavy. Hope McStay stays at the Lions.
Post Reply