Post Match. Pies unplug Power. All comments, please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
simon tonna
Posts: 2934
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:40 am
Location: carindale

Post by simon tonna »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:
Cam wrote:If you guys can't see the Buckley's rolling zone has been married to Harwick's run and gun chaos ball to give us Fly's gameplan well, good for you.
Buckley's rolling zone? Is that what we are calling last years monstrosity?
In no fault of he’s own, cam also predetermined Ginnivan would win obvious free kicks. And we all know how that ended.
no second chances
mgh3536
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by mgh3536 »

I love mcreery, but we gotta get more going forward from him

With Grundy and mihocech coming back either mcreery or hoskin Elliott will come under pressure
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

[quote="Pies4shaw"][quote="Jezza"]9 wins by two goals or less.

We’re trolling the competition now
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22168
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 144 times

Post by RudeBoy »

I rarely comment on umpiring, because it is often used an an excuse to camouflage poor play. But......seriously, Port were gifted at least 4 goals by the umps, a trend which started before the first bounce!!

Aside from that, it was a gutsy win by the Pies against a hard team playing to keep their season alive. Losing Adams and Howe made the win more commendable.

Anyone who doubts the worth of De Goey, watch a replay of this game. His power and presence around packs was match-winning stuff. We need to keep him if we are to keep our Premiership window open over the next few years.

'Magic' Johnson is a beauty. Ginni needs to just play the ball and don't expect to get any free kicks regardless of how he is tackled. He is a natural crumbing forward specialist.

I thought it was Lipinski's best game for a few weeks, and the best 2nd half from WHE. Bianco had a few bad errors in the first quarter, but had a good impact later, especially in the final quarter. Carmichael can play!

Cameron is very good all over the ground, despite not often being recognised for his performance by a lot of Pies supporters.

With Grundy and Checkers due to return next week, we should be even stronger, which we will need to be to get over the Dees.

10 in a row! Go Pies. 8)
Last edited by RudeBoy on Sat Jul 30, 2022 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

I get frustrated with the umpires because as a rule I don’t give them the time of day but geez you can’t be stuck in utter denial that their performances at the moment are crook
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

simon tonna wrote:
Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:
Cam wrote:If you guys can't see the Buckley's rolling zone has been married to Harwick's run and gun chaos ball to give us Fly's gameplan well, good for you.
Buckley's rolling zone? Is that what we are calling last years monstrosity?
In no fault of he’s own, cam also predetermined Ginnivan would win obvious free kicks. And we all know how that ended.
I will revisit this quote. And it's 'his own'. ;)
Get back on top.
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

RudeBoy wrote:I rarely comment on umpiring, because it is often used an an excuse to camouflage poor play. But......seriously, Port were gifted at least 4 goals by the umps, a trend which started before the first bounce!!
Exactly RB. And I’m pissed off that the Martians are causing people like us who don’t really GAF about umpiring because it is a necessary function, to notice how shit they are week after week (I’d forgive them for one or two bad games because that’s a given) but so many this season? Seriously?
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

piffdog wrote:
rambler wrote:Notice we NEVER EVER get a controversial decision our way?
So far this season I can only recall one howler that went our way and that was last weeks Murphy non 50 metre penalty before the winning goal.

We've had to endure multiple anti-Ginni highs, that Moore deliberate rushed behind and todays abominations to name just a few.

One that really set me off was McReary's textbook tackle on Dusty being paid high. It ruined our momentum when the game was hot.
That wasn’t a howler. Was a correct non award. Listen to ray chamberlains explanation on the Whateley show.[/quote]

That was technically correct because the umpire hadn’t entirely motioned the free kick with his arms. It’s not when the whistle is blown (cos the whistle could be for anything) but it’s when the umpire motions and points. Technically correct non call.
Est. 2002
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

Piesnchess wrote:
WhyPhilWhy? wrote:Did the umpiring appear as disgraceful on the TV as it appeared at the ground? Jesus wept!


Mate, you know, and i thiink your from my vintage, i honestly believe the umpiring was far better, fairer, back in the day, of just two field umpires, or even yep, way back, of only one umpire. Like the days of Jeff Crouch, and Bill Deller, John James, the aboriginal, it was better then
It was, except for the deaf as a post umpire Robinson who didn’t hear the final siren in the 1977 night GF until Kerry Good had marked the ball many seconds after the siren and kicked the winning goal for North
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 93 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

eddiesmith wrote:Didn’t watch but free kicks 23-18 the Pies way doesn’t suggest the one sided anti Pies umpiring display this thread is hinting at?
You obviously didn’t watch the game. You of all posters should know that the free kick numbers mean Jack shit. It’s where the Martians pull them out of their arse.
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29457
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 249 times
Been liked: 336 times

Post by Jezza »

Winning streaks (10+ games)

11 = Round 7 1902 - Round 17 1902
17 = Round 5 1903 - Round 2 1904 (PREMIERS within the streak)
11 = Round 3 1905 - Round 13 1905
12 = Round 12 1910 - Round 2 1911 (PREMIERS within the streak)
20 = Semi Final Replay 1928 - Round 18 1929 (PREMIERS within the streak)
11 = Preliminary Final 1935 - Round 9 1936 (PREMIERS within the streak)
14 = Round 12 1953 - Round 5 1954 (PREMIERS within the streak)
10 = Round 9 1959 - Round 18 1959
11 = Round 7 1965 - Round 17 1965
14 = Round 9 2011 - Round 23 2011
10 = Round 4 2012 - Round 14 2012
10 = Round 10 2022 - Present
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22168
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 144 times

Post by RudeBoy »

I liked the way Fly said it was more like a win by a few goals. Reckon it was his way of saying the umps gifted Port several goals.
Post Reply