Rucking Duties

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

watt price tully wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:
Mr Miyagi wrote:We can’t replace him, he’s a bit unique. We just get another ruck and adjust our game accordingly


I am utterly disgusted by this insane decision. its ****. God help us, if next season we have only Cameron, Cox, and kid Begg, as rucks. If , heaven forbid, Cox goes down, injured, long term, all we have is Cameron and a kid who got smashed in the ruck early this season, is far too raw. If that happens, we can damn well forget bout top four next season. Forget it, we wont make it then. Just utter madness, the Deees must be rubbing their hands with glee, at prospect of him and Gawn, running around, dominating the field of play.

Wrights first big major cockup, if this comes to pass. :o :shock: :x :roll:
Don’t blame Wright. Blame the previous administration for the contract clusterf*ck of Grundy and Treloar.


Treloar is NO Grundy. How come none of this sort of shit happens down at bloody Geelong, dont they have a salary cap at sleepy Hollow, whose cooking the books down there, ? why does only us, get salary cap woes. ?? that continue for ages, ?? does not add up at all.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
23 YIPPEE!!!

Post by 23 YIPPEE!!! »

Previous admin stuffed up Grundy contract saga and it’s come back to bite us on the arse
Need all of this sorted asap as well
Preferably this week
Then we move on
23 YIPPEE!!!

Post by 23 YIPPEE!!! »

Previous admin stuffed up Grundy contract saga and it’s come back to bite us on the arse
Need all of this sorted asap as well
Preferably this week
Then we move on
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

How do we replace Grundy??

Like almost every other premiership team does…. With a second stringer on $500k a year!
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

How do we replace Grundy ???? WE DONT. AND CANT.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
tbaker
Posts: 1211
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG

Post by tbaker »

burnsy17 wrote:How do we replace Grundy??

Like almost every other premiership team does…. With a second stringer on $500k a year!
So instead of paying 500k for a 2nd stringer, would we be prepared to pay 700k for the likes of Grundy? Because that's in effect what it would cost us to keep him, if the rumours are true in that we're paying the remaining 300k regardless. Looking at it like that, it seems crazy to get rid of him.
I find your lack of faith disturbing
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

^ You make too much commonsense for here.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Piesnchess wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:

I am utterly disgusted by this insane decision. its ****. God help us, if next season we have only Cameron, Cox, and kid Begg, as rucks. If , heaven forbid, Cox goes down, injured, long term, all we have is Cameron and a kid who got smashed in the ruck early this season, is far too raw. If that happens, we can damn well forget bout top four next season. Forget it, we wont make it then. Just utter madness, the Deees must be rubbing their hands with glee, at prospect of him and Gawn, running around, dominating the field of play.

Wrights first big major cockup, if this comes to pass. :o :shock: :x :roll:
Don’t blame Wright. Blame the previous administration for the contract clusterf*ck of Grundy and Treloar.


Treloar is NO Grundy. How come none of this sort of shit happens down at bloody Geelong, dont they have a salary cap at sleepy Hollow, whose cooking the books down there, ? why does only us, get salary cap woes. ?? that continue for ages, ?? does not add up at all.
The issue has been discussed here ad nauseum. This issue about the contracts and cost is not just about money but about flexibility to move fwd. Keeping him costs $. Getting rid of him is cheaper but more to the point provides flexibility with respect to future trading and picks.

The issue with Treloar was the contract as it is with Grundy. Whether he is better than, less than is not relevant. The focus is on the value (not just cost) that’s why the previous administration stuffed up.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
MAY-Z
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 pm

Post by MAY-Z »

think better wrote:I wonder if someone out of left field might be worth a shot

Harry Boyd was BOG in the SANFL grand final - 23 year old and a bit of a late developer but still only 24

https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/harry- ... tey-medal/
Boyd is clearly the number 1 ruck in the SANFL, dominant at both CB and around the ground

Strachaun from the crows is number 2

but the question isnt really how do we replace him, as he wasnt really part of the team this year, the question is are we better of bolstering the midfield to help with clearances or trying to get the most out of a very very expensive ruck

clearly the club have decided an extra mid is better, and personally i agree with them, the majority of the leagues rucks just need to be competitive and let the ball winners go to work
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

watt price tully wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:
watt price tully wrote: Don’t blame Wright. Blame the previous administration for the contract clusterf*ck of Grundy and Treloar.


Treloar is NO Grundy. How come none of this sort of shit happens down at bloody Geelong, dont they have a salary cap at sleepy Hollow, whose cooking the books down there, ? why does only us, get salary cap woes. ?? that continue for ages, ?? does not add up at all.
The issue has been discussed here ad nauseum. This issue about the contracts and cost is not just about money but about flexibility to move fwd. Keeping him costs $. Getting rid of him is cheaper but more to the point provides flexibility with respect to future trading and picks.

The issue with Treloar was the contract as it is with Grundy. Whether he is better than, less than is not relevant. The focus is on the value (not just cost) that’s why the previous administration stuffed up.


Whatever, I just hope an pray, we dont see him running around the MCG, next too Gawn, happy as Larry, holding a Premiership cup. The ultimate Collingwood nightmare scenario. :o
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

^ Join the queue. We all feel that. Would be nice but unrealistic that he accepts a pay cut.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Meredith1965
Posts: 529
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:38 pm

Post by Meredith1965 »

Grundy is a good footballer, but his key card is that he adds an extra half-mid at clearance. If we get an actual high quality extra mid for the 800k differential, (and we should at that price), I can understand the decision.

Cox seems to me an excellent ruckman who takes marks around the ground at critical points in games and has not been developed to his full potential may well have three or four years left,with Cameron as back up.
MAY-Z
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 pm

Post by MAY-Z »

Meredith1965 wrote:Grundy is a good footballer, but his key card is that he adds an extra half-mid at clearance. If we get an actual high quality extra mid for the 800k differential, (and we should at that price), I can understand the decision.

Cox seems to me an excellent ruckman who takes marks around the ground at critical points in games and has not been developed to his full potential may well have three or four years left,with Cameron as back up.
yep, and also don't forget how good Cameron was early on in the ruck role, he wasn't as good late but that was his first extended period playing 1st ruck. He will be much fitter for that and will probably train pre-season for a ruck role not a fwd/ruck role
Pies2016
Posts: 6749
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by Pies2016 »

MAY-Z wrote:
Meredith1965 wrote:Grundy is a good footballer, but his key card is that he adds an extra half-mid at clearance. If we get an actual high quality extra mid for the 800k differential, (and we should at that price), I can understand the decision.

Cox seems to me an excellent ruckman who takes marks around the ground at critical points in games and has not been developed to his full potential may well have three or four years left,with Cameron as back up.
yep, and also don't forget how good Cameron was early on in the ruck role, he wasn't as good late but that was his first extended period playing 1st ruck. He will be much fitter for that and will probably train pre-season for a ruck role not a fwd/ruck role
Yes. An important observation re cameron and Cox both having a better understanding of their roles next year.
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12383
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 16 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Why do we need to replace him with a similar or better ruckman? We just made a prelim without him so it’s not like he’s a big loss
Post Reply