Brody Grundy Dropped by Melbourne

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12383
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 16 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Keen to hear the thoughts of one particular poster on the above....suspect we might get nothing but crickets
Will no doubt be cheering on Brisbane tomorrow night despite it not being in Collingwood's best interests.
User avatar
Bruce Gonsalves
Posts: 842
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:17 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Bruce Gonsalves »

stui magpie wrote:On 7 news it was reported that he would play some VFL and work on his forward craft.
Hilarious from Melbourne considering they have a bye this weekend.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 84 times

Post by think positive »

stui magpie wrote:On 7 news it was reported that he would play some VFL and work on his forward craft.
Aww crap that’s insulting! Not surprising though, I’ve actively watched him, and I feel no regret other than he really seems like a nice intelligent person.

I do feel he let other areas of life take priority over his footy.

I don’t recall seeing him ever get heated, like Witt’s. I love it when Cox does cos he tears em a new one!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
simon tonna
Posts: 2934
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:40 am
Location: carindale

Post by simon tonna »

eddiesmith wrote:
Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Keen to hear the thoughts of one particular poster on the above....suspect we might get nothing but crickets
Will no doubt be cheering on Brisbane tomorrow night despite it not being in Collingwood's best interests.
Please don’t temp him.
The stats man might persuade others he’s still an all Australian contender.
no second chances
Duff Soviet Union
Posts: 1454
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:45 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Duff Soviet Union »

I apparently think Grundy is a better player than a lot of people on this board, and I'm still not sure getting rid of him was a good idea given how much we're still paying him, but I never had a clue what Melbourne were thinking with this one. They were probably the one club who I thought Grundy wouldn't be able to help, so of course they were the ones who wanted him the most.
"We ain't gotta dream no more"
woodys_world69
Posts: 2219
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Brisbane
Been liked: 20 times

Post by woodys_world69 »

hes more mobile than Gawn and his greatest strength at the pies was he was an extra midfielder.

as dunstall said on the couch this week, you just want a ruckman that will make a contest.. being a great tap ruckman can be easily defeated by a good opposition midfield that reads his taps instead.

grundy and his management knew that Melbourne was one of the worst clubs grundy could go to.... but they were the only ones willing to trade with the pies.

but its still a huge call to completely drop him from a football side without injury or an obvious media driven form slump
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

think positive wrote:
stui magpie wrote:On 7 news it was reported that he would play some VFL and work on his forward craft.
Aww crap that’s insulting! Not surprising though, I’ve actively watched him, and I feel no regret other than he really seems like a nice intelligent person.
I do feel he let other areas of life take priority over his footy.
Yes I agree. I can’t remember whether it was his manager or him, but the love and temptation of mega money over the club was too much for him to resist. I loved him at Collingwood but I have always believed that if his heart and commitment was not at Collingwood, he should move on, and he did.
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
Magpietothemax
Posts: 7969
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 15 times

Post by Magpietothemax »

lazzadesilva wrote:
Yes I agree. I can’t remember whether it was his manager or him, but the love and temptation of mega money over the club was too much for him to resist. I loved him at Collingwood but I have always believed that if his heart and commitment was not at Collingwood, he should move on, and he did.
He did not move on. We moved him on.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12383
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 16 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Duff Soviet Union wrote:I apparently think Grundy is a better player than a lot of people on this board, and I'm still not sure getting rid of him was a good idea given how much we're still paying him, but I never had a clue what Melbourne were thinking with this one. They were probably the one club who I thought Grundy wouldn't be able to help, so of course they were the ones who wanted him the most.
Given we replaced him with 3 players who have taken us from a bottom 4 side with Grundy to top of the ladder, I'm pretty sure the club made the right choice.
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6004
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Been liked: 78 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

stui magpie wrote:On 7 news it was reported that he would play some VFL and work on his forward craft.
And there in is the issue
Melbourne thought hey we’ve lost Jackson who can go forward and kick goals we need another ruck who can do the same so we will move Gawn there and ruck Grundy
Fine in theroy doesn’t work in reality
A couple weeks ago I posted a damming stat in the other Grundy thread
Melbourne were +72 in centre clearances with Gawn as ruck and -44 with Grundy as ruck hitting to the same midfield
On season 2023 stats he’s ranked #9 ruck in competition and 143rd ranked player in the game
Look he’s a good player but he’s never been a tap ruckman and never been a good overhead mark so he won’t make it as a forward
Gawn is a very good tap ruckman and strong mark overhead but can’t kick for goal with any certainty
Melbourne brought in Van Rooyen a young true forward so the chances are he will get a extended run to build cohesion in the forward line

Grundy will now become the highest paid player to play VFL consistently
I don’t see how they bring him back unless it’s through injury or they just play him to see if they can find some value in him to trade him away at seasons end

The funny thing is go back to week 2 or 3 when I called this move by Melbourne a massive mistake watching them early in the season onky to be told by “wiser” poster when Grundy gets his knee right and now he has a elite midfield to hit too he will be AA ruck again
You could see early on a complete disconnection between Grundy and the mids
I remember watching a game early on and Clayton and Petracca being with a metre of space on opponent and the ball dropping down at Grundys feet
They both out their hands on their hips and just looked perplexed
Fast forward several minutes Gawn rucking he hits it straight down Olivers throat who bounces then kicks it forward for a Melbourne forward who goals
It was pure tap ruckman to elite mid work
How the mighty have fallen
User avatar
uncanny
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:23 pm
Location: Castlemaine
Been liked: 12 times

Post by uncanny »

scoobydoo wrote:
Magpietothemax wrote:
jonmac1954 wrote:So easy to be wise after the events.


Simon Goodwin said Grundy is now at a club that appreciates him.
Pretty sure the Collingwood coaches he played under never dropped him.
No one said he was a hack, just not worth $1 million a yr.
Spot on Scooby doo. He was never dropped at Collingwood and was appreciated by the club. Money talks so if they didn't appreciate him why would he have been offered that monster deal? He did cop stick from supporters but most of the criticism levelled at him came at the end of his time there coinciding with his big contract renewal and drop in form from the heights of 2018/19.
I thought it a pretty cheap shot from Goodwin at the time tbh. One that has come back to bite him hard at the moment...
woodsmen rule
User avatar
rad
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:46 pm

Post by rad »

So how would it work?

Port need a ruckman and Grundy is from SA.

If Grundy was traded to Port for more than what the Dees are paying him does that extra come off the money we are paying the Dees?

Could end up a 3 club salary, all paying $300k each lol
User avatar
Croat Pie
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:54 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 3 times

Post by Croat Pie »

Duff Soviet Union wrote:I apparently think Grundy is a better player than a lot of people on this board, and I'm still not sure getting rid of him was a good idea given how much we're still paying him, but I never had a clue what Melbourne were thinking with this one. They were probably the one club who I thought Grundy wouldn't be able to help, so of course they were the ones who wanted him the most.
I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that with the deal reached between the Pies and the Dees that he's off our books at this season's end.
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Interesting to read the Pies didn't like his attitude during rehab. Obviously just journo speculation I s'pose.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6004
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Been liked: 78 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

rad wrote:So how would it work?

Port need a ruckman and Grundy is from SA.

If Grundy was traded to Port for more than what the Dees are paying him does that extra come off the money we are paying the Dees?

Could end up a 3 club salary, all paying $300k each lol
Grundy is off our books come November 1
We paid Melbourne $750k which represented $150k a year for the remaining 5 years in his deal
He was owed just over $900k a season so Melbourne will have him on there books at basically $150k this season and still owe him $3.6m over next 4 years
They may have juggled that across the years but that’s what he is guaranteed

Right now any club wanting Grundy will have the upper hand
He’s value has declined dramatically since he signed the original deal

Melbourne be might be happy to wear $300k a season just to get him off there books
They won’t be receiving any substantial draft picks from the deal
When a club takes on a large salary like that you don’t get rewarded
We took what pick 26 ?
Melbourne might get a 3rd round pick and maybe some pick swaps
Post Reply