What pisses you off? Part II: Electric Boogaloo

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 85 times

Post by think positive »

daylight robbery
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54650
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 73 times

Post by stui magpie »

Bruce Gonsalves wrote:Doesn't P1ss me off, but most likely my Cuz in Qld. Sold his beachfront Gold Coast holiday house he's had for around 30 years. Sold for a bit over 9Mil and has copped CGT of around 4Mil.
Ouch, that's fkn harsh.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Dark Beanie
Posts: 4796
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:41 am
Location: A galaxy far, far away.
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times

Post by Dark Beanie »

It is a bit harsh but if you look at it from the point of view that 30 years ago they probably bought if for next to nothing (compared to today) and still has $5 million.

Same as people who sold a unit near us which was an inheritance from an aunt. They were griping about the amount they got for it - expected more - but still ended up with $125k each (6 of them) which they didn't have to do much for.
If you are foolish enough to be contented, don't show it, but just grumble with the rest. - Jerome K Jerome
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54650
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 73 times

Post by stui magpie »

CGT is a rip off. I thought it used to be that if you held something for more than 10 years you didn't pay CGT.

Now it seems that it's 12 months, but you only get a 50% discount. So if you buy for $100k and sell for $1M years later, you pay CGT on $400k. $1M x50%
minus purchase price of $100k. (I think, I had to figure out how it worked for my tax return as I had to sell some shares I had 8 months ago when I was running out of cash)

I'd be bleeding if I had to pay that much tax on something I'd bought, paid for and maintained for all those years.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 85 times

Post by think positive »

Yep it’s ridiculous
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
David
Posts: 50561
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 35 times

Post by David »

Dark Beanie wrote:It is a bit harsh but if you look at it from the point of view that 30 years ago they probably bought if for next to nothing (compared to today) and still has $5 million.

Same as people who sold a unit near us which was an inheritance from an aunt. They were griping about the amount they got for it - expected more - but still ended up with $125k each (6 of them) which they didn't have to do much for.
Agree with this. Owning a house over a long period of time is massively lucrative, and you can claim deductions for the work you do on it. So what's being taxed is, essentially, the profit you made on it. Not sure why that should be any different from the tax we pay for the actual work we do.

What pissed me off tonight was getting sucked in to watching the soccer game! At least I can now go back to not caring about the sport again for another four years. 8)
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

I don’t mind top class soccer and other ball sports. I hated the result but enjoyed watching and supporting the mighty Aussies as always. It is a great joy to watch them and if they are playing World Cup marbles, I’ll be watching them
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 85 times

Post by think positive »

David wrote:
Dark Beanie wrote:It is a bit harsh but if you look at it from the point of view that 30 years ago they probably bought if for next to nothing (compared to today) and still has $5 million.

Same as people who sold a unit near us which was an inheritance from an aunt. They were griping about the amount they got for it - expected more - but still ended up with $125k each (6 of them) which they didn't have to do much for.
Agree with this. Owning a house over a long period of time is massively lucrative, and you can claim deductions for the work you do on it. So what's being taxed is, essentially, the profit you made on it. Not sure why that should be any different from the tax we pay for the actual work we do.

What pissed me off tonight was getting sucked in to watching the soccer game! At least I can now go back to not caring about the sport again for another four years. 8)
they were not upset about getting taxed but the percentage of tax, which is ridiculous.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54650
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 73 times

Post by stui magpie »

David wrote: Owning a house over a long period of time is massively lucrative, and you can claim deductions for the work you do on it.
Since when? :?

Owning a house over a long period is only lucrative when you sell it and you can only claim maintenance if it's a rental and negatively geared and even then there's limits. if you can claim maintenance on a Holiday house, someone please confirm cos I've got 10's of thousands to claim. They're a fkn money pit.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54650
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 73 times

Post by stui magpie »

Losing weight is expensive.

Checked out the Shorts drawer today in prep for the trip to Darwin next month. Shit. :x

Last summer I wasn't thinking that clearly, but I could still wear the 36" shorts with a belt. Now they fit like a doona cover. Have to take them to the Op Shop. The 34" fit, but I'll need a belt to hold them up once they stretch from wear and I have stuff in the pockets.

So now I need to go shopping for summer.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Bruce Gonsalves wrote:Doesn't P1ss me off, but most likely my Cuz in Qld. Sold his beachfront Gold Coast holiday house he's had for around 30 years. Sold for a bit over 9Mil and has copped CGT of around 4Mil.
Hard to feel sorry for someone who cleared $5m
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Current List:

Dickheads with flares at the soccer.
Sussan Ley
Hillsong
Kane Cornes
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34678
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 86 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

^ It's a clear mark of her electoral power that I had to google Sussan Ley to find out what she does for a living. Also, isn't there a law against spelling "Susan" with 3 Ss?
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 85 times

Post by think positive »

stui magpie wrote:
David wrote: Owning a house over a long period of time is massively lucrative, and you can claim deductions for the work you do on it.
Since when? :?

Owning a house over a long period is only lucrative when you sell it and you can only claim maintenance if it's a rental and negatively geared and even then there's limits. if you can claim maintenance on a Holiday house, someone please confirm cos I've got 10's of thousands to claim. They're a fkn money pit.
No you can’t! Maybe the initial repairs. We did so much ourselves building ours and that’s labour we can’t claim.

Thing about houses too, the profit can seem huge, but maybe they paid top dollar at the time they bought it, as in $1,000,000 is not nearly as impressive now as it was 30 years ago. It should be indexed or something!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
David
Posts: 50561
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 35 times

Post by David »

What'sinaname wrote:Current List:

Dickheads with flares at the soccer.
Sussan Ley
Hillsong
Kane Cornes
What's Sussan been up to?
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Post Reply