Pre-Match. Magpies v. Bombers. All comments.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
shawthing
Posts: 2919
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 97 times

Post by shawthing »

This could be a match with a soccer scoreline. Nothing in it for the Bummers except pride. But they lost that years ago when they became the Dopers.

I totally agree with the people saying Port and Melbourne will be desperately trying to avoid Brisbane at the Gabba. Advantage Melbourne, as they can wait to see whether they should tank or not.

Right now the only reason Brisbane is not the hot flag favourite is their record at the G. They won't need to play again in Melbourne until GF day. So lock them in for one spot. Can we avoid the half of the draw that includes Melbourne and Carlton? That's the real question. Mind you our record against Sydney's not great either.

Picked a bad year to give up glue sniffing. :(
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Second spot and a date with Port at the MCG is much more appealing than the Demons.

Play our VFL team, rest the senior squad, and let 2 Metre Peter have his merry way with us.
Est. 2002
User avatar
themonk
Posts: 2225
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by themonk »

Raw Hammer wrote:Second spot and a date with Port at the MCG is much more appealing than the Demons.

Play our VFL team, rest the senior squad, and let 2 Metre Peter have his merry way with us.
I'd prefer the challenge of Melbourne first, if we get over that we are potentially in a position of playing 2 interstate sides to win a flag.

Just saying :shock:
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29525
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 259 times
Been liked: 338 times

Post by Jezza »

Raw Hammer wrote:Second spot and a date with Port at the MCG is much more appealing than the Demons.

Play our VFL team, rest the senior squad, and let 2 Metre Peter have his merry way with us.
I'd spew up if the club adopted this mindset in order to avoid Melbourne.

Play to win with your best available side.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
npalm
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 9:54 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by npalm »

Magpietothemax wrote: Sub: Cameron
(We need to see how Cox goes by himself in the ruck - did not get to see that last week....)
I'd be tempted to give Cameron a run in the VFL (are they playing this week?).

Cox has done well as the solo ruckman in the past. In round 9 this year against GWS he had 19 disposals, 9 marks, 2 goals and 10/10 coaches votes.
Side by side.
Pies2016
Posts: 6868
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 174 times

Post by Pies2016 »

Jezza wrote:
Raw Hammer wrote:Second spot and a date with Port at the MCG is much more appealing than the Demons.

Play our VFL team, rest the senior squad, and let 2 Metre Peter have his merry way with us.
I'd spew up if the club adopted this mindset in order to avoid Melbourne.

Play to win with your best available side.
Agree. That’s also offering up even more players who wouldn’t have played footy for at least THREE weeks ( when you include Moore and McCreery and maybe Hill and Murph ) and then expecting them all to hit the ground running in the opening minutes of a qualifying final. You need everyone match fit. The only ones to be rested should be those who the medical staff would say will benefit from missing a week or two.
Besides, even if we “ aimed “ for second, we have no control over who finishes in third spot anyway. Could end up being the Dees and for that, then all we’ve done is given the Bombers a positive end of season story. Why would any Collingwood supporter wish that.
User avatar
Haff
Posts: 5027
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 1:24 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 55 times

Post by Haff »

McReery soft but thats the AFL nowadays - Thanks BT. Might be good for him but its a long break before the first final.

Cant see us losing to Essendon who have nothing to play for so probably top spot and Melbourne at the G.

Wait thats too positive.

Essendon by 6 goals.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 1035
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 53 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

It's a nothing game, the future will only remember what is done in the finals.

It's finals, have to be good enough to beat anyone, doesn't't matter where or who.

Dogs just lost to WC. Obviously, the opponent doesn't matter if YOU are not good enough on the day.


Not thinking too much if some players had 1 or 2 or 3 weeks off.
There is an argument which says the niggles are rested, and they are rearing to go.

From Monday leading into the first final they will all train together, they are like slot cars when it comes to being ready for game day.

No injuries or major collisions, hoping they come out as healthy as possible after the Essendon game.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Dont give a shit whom we play first off, Port or Deeees. We lost to Melb last time minus six of our best players, and the flu, in very close match, which we almost won. Beat Port over there, on their pissing ground, after being behind. We can beat both of these prick teams, lets demolish Essendoper, freshen up, reload, and win our way to the Prelim. Final.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50663
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 77 times

Post by David »

Two certain outs in McCreery and Ryan, with Murphy a maybe depending on how he pulls up, and De Goey and Hill presumably back in if they're okay (as well as Cox moving into the starting 22).

Selection is likely to be a bit more complicated than that, though, as it still leaves one or two spaces in defence to fill and perhaps a tall to come out somewhere for Cox. I can't quite imagine the Howe experiment coming to an end for a near dead rubber Round 24 match, so it's hard to see any other option than bringing Ruscoe in. Perhaps McInnes gets a chance to play midfield too if De Goey still isn't right.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20121
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 31 times

Post by What'sinaname »

David wrote:Two certain outs in McCreery and Ryan, with Murphy a maybe depending on how he pulls up, and De Goey and Hill presumably back in if they're okay (as well as Cox moving into the starting 22).

Selection is likely to be a bit more complicated than that, though, as it still leaves one or two spaces in defence to fill and perhaps a tall to come out somewhere for Cox. I can't quite imagine the Howe experiment coming to an end for a near dead rubber Round 24 match, so it's hard to see any other option than bringing Ruscoe in. Perhaps McInnes gets a chance to play midfield too if De Goey still isn't right.
Our team selection seems better with injuries. I think Fly is struggling to find the best 23 when all players are available.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34877
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Raw Hammer wrote:Second spot and a date with Port at the MCG is much more appealing than the Demons.

Play our VFL team, rest the senior squad, and let 2 Metre Peter have his merry way with us.
Look for the AFL to accuse us of tanking for draft choices.
Woods
Posts: 2096
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Woods »

“They’ve lost their edge. I back Craig McRae to have that return, to find a way to motivate this group. And then the faithful get involved. There is no roar like a Collingwood roar, Gerard.”

‘The Monday Means Test with David King’ - Round 23’ (40:00 min mark), Whateley program, SEN, 21 Aug 2023.
Last edited by Woods on Mon Aug 21, 2023 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
23 YIPPEE!!!

Post by 23 YIPPEE!!! »

In JDG Hill Carmicheal McInness

Out Murphy Ryan McCreery

FB: Quaynor Frampton Howe
CB: Maynard Marcov Pendles
C: J Daicos Crisp WHE
CF: Hill Checkers McInness
FF: Elliott McStay Ginny
R: Cox JDG Mitchell
INT: Cameron Carmicheal Steele Adams
SUB: McRae
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3842
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 202 times
Been liked: 185 times

Post by LaurieHolden »

^ McRae retired in 2004, his playing days are over. The last VFL Captain / Coach was Charlie Sutton in 1954. Despite our recent form he's not the answer.
We have one player called Markov.
Carmichael didn't sign his player contract like that.
McInnes isn't Mississippi, it's not that hard.
C'mon '90, you've had all year to get these right.

It's like the 12th Man player name practice before the series.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cspzr9o ... hMan-Topic
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
Post Reply