The gender pay gap
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40237
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 339 times
- Been liked: 103 times
- Skids
- Posts: 9938
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 44 times
she quit... too hard.Skids wrote:My old mates at Roy Hill just copped another kick in the guts.
NPI Superintendent role was vacant. Long standing supervisor in the department had been seconded into the role and was the obvious choice for the position.
Nope. A young female has been appointed to the $250k+ role.
No experience in the position but will be carried along regardless.
The site has a 40/40/20 target to meet and, as long as Iron Ore is sold for the ridiculous price it continues to hold, that will be the goal.
* 40% male, 40% female, 20% 'other'.
Don't count the days, make the days count.
- Skids
- Posts: 9938
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 44 times
Supportive colleagues? She was gifted the job even though she had no experience in the role and hadn't even worked in a supervisory role. Should never have been appointed and only was because of her gender.
Oh don't worry, they'll invent some new role, maybe Superintendent of internal.communications or something along those lines, offer her a 10% pay increase and beg her to stay.
Oh don't worry, they'll invent some new role, maybe Superintendent of internal.communications or something along those lines, offer her a 10% pay increase and beg her to stay.
Don't count the days, make the days count.
- Bucks5
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 19 times
- Contact:
This came up in my twitter feed.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1746515707360088486
So the gender pay gap is purely based on annual salaries so it stands to reason that women will collectively earn less as they usually elect to work part time particularly while their children are growing up
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1746515707360088486
So the gender pay gap is purely based on annual salaries so it stands to reason that women will collectively earn less as they usually elect to work part time particularly while their children are growing up
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say?
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54830
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 161 times
- David
- Posts: 50660
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 76 times
Last edited by David on Fri Jan 19, 2024 11:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- David
- Posts: 50660
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 76 times
^ There are actually quite a few other more practical solutions, for instance: improving childcare funding and rebates to make it easier for women to return to work earlier; encouraging more fathers to share a more hands-on parenting role by increasing paternity leave provisions; and addressing other issues that tend to cause a wage gap in higher-earning brackets such as salary transparency.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54830
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 161 times
^
There's a hell of a lot more to it than just more women choosing to work part time, lots of which I'm sure was covered earlier in the thread. A large contributing factor is the number of occupations that predominantly employ women that are poorly paid.
And what about the number of women who choose not to work after having kids because their partner earns enough that they don't have to.
Simply pulling a set of numbers together without proper context and huffing and puffing about there being a gender pay gap and we need to fix it is, IMHO, just virtue signalling bullshit and finger pointing.
A good starting point would be to increase wages of front line people working in child care/kinders but since most of the money comes from the state governments, it's easier to huff and puff and point the finger at large corporates.
There's a hell of a lot more to it than just more women choosing to work part time, lots of which I'm sure was covered earlier in the thread. A large contributing factor is the number of occupations that predominantly employ women that are poorly paid.
And what about the number of women who choose not to work after having kids because their partner earns enough that they don't have to.
Simply pulling a set of numbers together without proper context and huffing and puffing about there being a gender pay gap and we need to fix it is, IMHO, just virtue signalling bullshit and finger pointing.
A good starting point would be to increase wages of front line people working in child care/kinders but since most of the money comes from the state governments, it's easier to huff and puff and point the finger at large corporates.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- David
- Posts: 50660
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 76 times
Where I tend to agree is that "the wage gap" is just a slogan, and that any serious approach to the issue should be drilling down into the statistics further and finding areas where there are specific problems that need to be addressed.
Having said that, sometimes people need simplistic slogans to get interested in something in the first place.
Having said that, sometimes people need simplistic slogans to get interested in something in the first place.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange