This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Pies4shaw wrote:What, for NZ, would a "better 100th Test" look like against Australia? Will Williamson improve on his series average of 4.5 or will he end the series with a lower series average than Southee (who is averaging 4)? Will Southee get a wicket - if so, will he average under 69 with the ball in this Test? Those are the questions sane New Zealanders are presently asking themselves.
It looks like the answer to my first question is a "yes" and "yes": Williamson has nearly doubled his series average to an 8.66 but Southee now averages 14.5 for the series.
They really do need to put SPD BradSmith back in the middle order to shore it up - Head and Marsh have both tnhrown their wickets away, cheaply, again. The lineup just looks flakey with Australia's best batsman thrown to the wolves at the top of the order.
6/166. The lead is 4. The game, however, looks lost.
Henry has bowled a huge pile of half-paced, unthreatening crap - but has 5-fer: that tells you everything you need to know about Australia's middle-order batting.