Voted for Jamie. Everyone get onto it.
https://www.afl.com.au/mark-of-the-year
Vote for Mark of the Year -- WHE, Jamie
Moderator: bbmods
-
think positive
- Posts: 40237
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 339 times
- Been liked: 103 times
-
Jezza
- Posts: 29523
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 259 times
- Been liked: 338 times
It was forgone conclusion, but Elliott's mark officially won a nomination for Mark of the Year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_2zUEe43PU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_2zUEe43PU
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | -
Presti35
- Posts: 19908
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 441 times
- Been liked: 214 times
There was Geelong people who actually thought Guthries mark was better. Go ahead and support your team and all, but sheesh.Jezza wrote:It was forgone conclusion, but Elliott's mark officially won a nomination for Mark of the Year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_2zUEe43PU
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
-
Presti35
- Posts: 19908
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 441 times
- Been liked: 214 times
Re: Vote for Mark of the Year -- WHE
Had this conversation today. I am in shock that ppl are so biased towards their team, that they think a good mark is better than the best mark taken in 5 years. Purely based on the players jumper.Presti35 wrote:And there are actually Geelong people who think Guthrie took the better mark.
It was more meaningful in the game and a classic mark they teach kids in school.
At least there were non-Collingwood people on my side. But yes, the Krakouer-Walker and Howe-Daniher marks were debated too.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!