Post Match. Pies win another thriller. All comments.
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:39 pm
Even more amazing is that they managed to do this whilst kicking 4 behinds for the match.1eyedpie wrote:What is amazing regarding this match is norf scored their first behind at the 2:45 min mark in first qtr then went on to kick 19 goals straight with their second behind kicked with less than 20 seconds left in the game!
This must be some sought of world record!
Did Bruz get cited for that tackle? I haven’t heard anything so all good I think.Take_a_Screamer wrote:1 match suspension...
Dawson lifts his elbow after Jack Crisp disposes of the ball, making contact with Jack's face.
https://www.zerohanger.com/afl-mro-port ... ns-152026/
It’s funny you say that because while his last quarter ( and the later part of third quarter when the heat came off ) we’re good, I thought he and some others struggled with Norths pressure in the first half. Sullivan currently strikes me as one of those players who is too good for the VFL but still yet to prove himself when the heat is really on at AFL level. To be fair, Norths pressure in the first half was elite but coping with elite pressure is what separates the best from the rest. Both Sullivan and Ned Long will be interesting watches for the rest of the season.Nearly wrote:Just watching the last quarter again. Really very impressed with Sullivan. In everything, cool, knows the system inside out, instrumental.
He can’t be dropped no matter who comes back.
I agree. Said as much in the game thread before the miracle started.Pies2016 wrote:It’s funny you say that because while his last quarter ( and the later part of third quarter when the heat came off ) we’re good, I thought he and some others struggled with Norths pressure in the first half. Sullivan currently strikes me as one of those players who is too good for the VFL but still yet to prove himself when the heat is really on at AFL level. To be fair, Norths pressure in the first half was elite but coping with elite pressure is what separates the best from the rest. Both Sullivan and Ned Long will be interesting watches for the rest of the season.Nearly wrote:Just watching the last quarter again. Really very impressed with Sullivan. In everything, cool, knows the system inside out, instrumental.
He can’t be dropped no matter who comes back.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
Sullivan has played well since making his debut. However, once we get Pendles, JDG and possibly Mitchell back, there will be no room for him in our side. I like the kid, but he is a depth player. Nevertheless, he is a good depth player.Nearly wrote:Just watching the last quarter again. Really very impressed with Sullivan. In everything, cool, knows the system inside out, instrumental.
He can’t be dropped no matter who comes back.
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45001
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 21 times
- Contact:
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45001
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 21 times
- Contact:
Well people do thing and says things during a Game they would never say after the GameRudeBoy wrote:I'm actually not interested in arguing with those supporters who tossed in the towel early in the game. That's their right. That's their problem. Live with it.
However, I am always ashamed of supposed 'supporters' who personally attack any of our players, regardless of how bad they are playing. It's fine to be disappointed, and to point out our weaknesses, including a lack of intensity. But....NEVER EVER accuse our players of being weak or not trying.
Finally, I don't intend to call out any Nicksters, for their disrespectful and weak kneed in-game comments. They will no doubt be highly embarrassed by their own immaturity, without me needing to call them out.
.
Very Emotional Time
I am Da Man
- Raw Hammer
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
- Location: The Gutter
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 4 times
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20118
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 31 times
The explanation doesn't align with how the game is umpired. While technically, what Laura Keane said might be correct (but I doubt it), umpires have paid 50 for when a player encroaches before the he/she has blown the whistle or called stand.Big T wrote:100% that is what likely happened. Not 15.Lone Ranger wrote:It was reasonable for Sidey and Beau to think was was not 15 and so play on. In the deafening roar it was the right decision to reiterate he had paid the mark and bring them back
So if Keane is saying this was correct, she also saying that umpires have been wrong about 50 times this year.
Reality is, it should have been 50 once the umpires deemed he took the mark and didn't play on.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
- 1eyedpie
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:15 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 1 time
^
Am I the only one who heard a secondary voice say “play on” when Scott took the mark?
On the Couch last night played the audio without commentary and I swear you can hear another voice say play on, obviously from another umpire who thought it didn’t travel 15.
Am I the only one who heard a secondary voice say “play on” when Scott took the mark?
On the Couch last night played the audio without commentary and I swear you can hear another voice say play on, obviously from another umpire who thought it didn’t travel 15.
Never disperse your focus unless absolutely necessary. Face one adversary at a time!
BARRACK HARD!
BARRACK HARD!