so now its thanks for coming to?

ed healey · Post by **ed healey** » Wed Oct 10, 2001 9:24 am

there will be a delisting of about 8 to fit in the draft picks.
Wasley,Roach,Shaw,,maybe
any more that should go?

Broadie · Post by **Broadie** » Wed Oct 10, 2001 9:42 am

Lists must be culled to 35 not 30 (as your 8 suggests).

We've already culled Wasley & a few others (exactly who escapes me right now) so there won't be a NEED to cull many. Just depends on whether the club sees the incoming draftees as worth more than those on our current list.

Broadie

mandy · Post by **mandy** » Wed Oct 10, 2001 1:48 pm

Lane and Shaw?

Works for me.

Colours are an illusion. There is only black and white.

Black_White · Post by **Black_White** » Wed Oct 10, 2001 4:27 pm

Isn't Lane still contracted for 1 year? If we delist it means we pay him for nothing

-Craig

O.K.....I know we pay him for nothing now!

FAITH

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Wed Oct 10, 2001 5:15 pm

Mandy im disappointed, in you wanting to delist Tyson Lane. What has Tyson ever done to you........lol lol

I think Tyson is a versatile player and if allowed to find a niche in the side will prove very useful. Rhyce Shaw is only young and hopefully this year can take the next step.

JLC

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL

Brown26 · Post by **Brown26** » Thu Oct 11, 2001 2:16 am

Can't we have a guy from the draft on our rookie list, to "groom" him for a year? Or doesn't it work that way?

Pies for Premiers 2002, 3, 4, 5, 6....

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

so now its thanks for coming to?

so now its thanks for coming to?