Scott Pendlebury (Silk)
Moderator: bbmods
- pendles#1
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:45 am
Re: HOW GOOD IS THIS KID
of course i mean scotty p best #16 in the leaguependles#1 wrote:in his two games he has shown that he will be a terrific ball winner and user at our club for the next ten or so years
dc is cool
Re: HOW GOOD IS THIS KID
pendles#1 wrote:of course i mean scotty p best #16 in the leaguependles#1 wrote:in his two games he has shown that he will be a terrific ball winner and user at our club for the next ten or so years
hhhmmm...... Travis Johnstone and a certain J Brown might have claims to that title......
Beware the swooping Magpie.
- melissa
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 1:38 pm
- Location: Geelong, Victoria
- Contact:
i think the D's win was a bit of a fluke, they might have won by 47 but they caught us on the back foot, with injuries from the Lions game and no Brodie, Swan or Maxy. It won't happen again.
on Pendles i was impressed, the hype seems to be justified. Just hope he can keep it up.
on Pendles i was impressed, the hype seems to be justified. Just hope he can keep it up.
Congrats Bucks, on a great return! Bring on the Crows!
-
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 12:18 am
- Contact:
- rand corp
- Posts: 3912
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: south east asia
- Contact:
- favourites 2008
- Posts: 7290
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:09 pm
- Location: Mooroolbark
- Contact:
- loki04
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:51 pm
- Location: Broken Hill
He is also bottom aged (17) so plenty of scope with pendles he will be a gun.rand corp wrote:Early signs are good, plenty to work with there.
Also got to remember this is a kid that had glandular fever over the pre-season so hardly did one.
Will no doubt come on in leaps and bounds next season I'd be tipping
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
yes ive been improved with his ball winning abilities and his time when he gets the ball. He is also composed.
However that failed attempt to go up for the mark rates pretty highly for me. He just let Davey get to the ball. Obviously he is young and very thin...but he cant shirk a contest, especially whilst he is still young and developing.
Still think Thomas was more influential in his first games. Pendles possessions have been pretty loose...id like to see him win some hard ball and tackle etc.
However early signs are great.
However that failed attempt to go up for the mark rates pretty highly for me. He just let Davey get to the ball. Obviously he is young and very thin...but he cant shirk a contest, especially whilst he is still young and developing.
Still think Thomas was more influential in his first games. Pendles possessions have been pretty loose...id like to see him win some hard ball and tackle etc.
However early signs are great.
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
- loki04
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:51 pm
- Location: Broken Hill
yes the Davey mark was bad but he may of thought he was right and Davey flew in from the side. I don't think he deliberately shirked it as the week before he dropped infront of a charging J.Brown and I know who I'd be less inclined to get ran through by.DaVe86 wrote:yes Ive been improved with his ball winning abilities and his time when he gets the ball. He is also composed.
However that failed attempt to go up for the mark rates pretty highly for me. He just let Davey get to the ball. Obviously he is young and very thin...but he cant shirk a contest, especially whilst he is still young and developing.
Still think Thomas was more influential in his first games. Pendles possessions have been pretty loose...id like to see him win some hard ball and tackle etc.
However early signs are great.
He has won the hard ball and been in and under and got the ball out to players on numerous occasions he is actually very good in the pack.
As for tackling he will get better at that when he puts on some kg's and gets more exp.
- Pied Piper
- Posts: 6196
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 12:45 am
- Location: Pig City
- Contact:
Think you're forgetting a mark he took in his debut, backing into a pack situation which showed not just great courage but a vice-like grip on the ball. Probably the reason you don't remember is, the mark wasn't paid - ruled as touched off the boot. I think it was the final quarter against the Doggies. So, just saying never judge a player by the one act, good or bad.DaVe86 wrote:However that failed attempt to go up for the mark rates pretty highly for me. He just let Davey get to the ball. Obviously he is young and very thin...but he cant shirk a contest, especially whilst he is still young and developing.
I also rate Pendlebury's future very highly and I'm almost uncomfortably reminded of some really great players - I say uncomfortably because I don't want to make those comparisons when he's played two games. He still has plenty to learn and I'm sure he'll have dips, just like Daisy is having ATM. But they are both great recruits whom I'm confident have great careers ahead of them.
"The greatest thing that could happen to the nation is when we get rid of all the media. Then we could live in peace and tranquillity, and no one would know anything." - Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
not judging him, i too am very excited about his future. He has shown a great ability to win the ball and doesnt panick in a pack...much the same as Dal Santo.
All im saying is that at the moment, his size is a worry in big games against big bodied sides. This will not be a concern in 3 years. Im not sure if he is in our top 22 yet however for this reason. But his future is bright. I feel he will be a very consistent 20+ possession getter week in week out whereas Thomas may drift in and out of games more.
All im saying is that at the moment, his size is a worry in big games against big bodied sides. This will not be a concern in 3 years. Im not sure if he is in our top 22 yet however for this reason. But his future is bright. I feel he will be a very consistent 20+ possession getter week in week out whereas Thomas may drift in and out of games more.
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.