Why Mal Michael really left Pies
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2000 6:01 pm
Why Mal Michael really left Pies
Well,
It seems Mal left due to the following reason
I should say was asked to leave.
[CUT - Sorry Member - not on here - not in public - thank you]
Well done Mal
Why do we get all the idiots at the club.
The club has tried to keep a lid on this
[This message has been edited by Mike (edited 22 September 2000).]
It seems Mal left due to the following reason
I should say was asked to leave.
[CUT - Sorry Member - not on here - not in public - thank you]
Well done Mal
Why do we get all the idiots at the club.
The club has tried to keep a lid on this
[This message has been edited by Mike (edited 22 September 2000).]
Hey Member U idiot do u really think u should be discussing this especially on here. I too heard a while ago that Mal had been in off field trouble but dont go mentioning round here do i. Now i dunno how much truth there actually is too all this but believe me if u think that is bad u havent heard anything yet!!! Just trust me players arent angles but u should just let the papers do their jobs!
???
???
Member,
That's the second negative message today. Buckley and now Mal. I don't see the point???
The Buckley thing I took on board now I wonder why I bothered. I guess it was more to do with Joffa putting his hand up than you. You can just F$%^ OFF! with all your negative crap and go back to talking about your neighbours, your work mates, anyone as long as it's back stabbing eh?
That's the second negative message today. Buckley and now Mal. I don't see the point???
The Buckley thing I took on board now I wonder why I bothered. I guess it was more to do with Joffa putting his hand up than you. You can just F$%^ OFF! with all your negative crap and go back to talking about your neighbours, your work mates, anyone as long as it's back stabbing eh?
calm down Russie boy!
I would like to ask one question here member Where are u actually getting this from? U come on here as if u are some secret official or something do u actaully have anything to do with the club coz if u do i dont think they would appreciate u spilling all this private 'info'
???
I would like to ask one question here member Where are u actually getting this from? U come on here as if u are some secret official or something do u actaully have anything to do with the club coz if u do i dont think they would appreciate u spilling all this private 'info'
???
- One Eyed Pie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 1999 8:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria,Australia
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2000 6:01 pm
Lets get one thing straight.
The Club is bigger than the individual.
I wanted this to become public to you all because its not fair that the club keeps coping shit on why we let players go.
Now if any of you can't handle the truth than don't reply.
I am not bagging the club, I am actually congratulating them that they had the balls to piss off a player that is trouble.
When I pay money to the club for players to play I want them to give 100% like I do at work and not stuff around with indecent behaviour.
As to the person that told me to F_ _ _ off. I find you immature and irresponsible to be a collingwood follower.
From now on I will do as you wish and never right on here again.
I don't need to reveal my sources.
I was right about gehrig and all the players that got sacked.
I am correct about Mal and also Buckley.
Its not as if a spend countless of hours on here like I have nothing else to do, I do have a live.
Why don't you all at least find out facts before you create bullshit rumours on here.
I was trying to give everyone a legitimate insight into factual information.
I GUESS YOU ALL DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT, INSTEAD YOU WANT RUMOUR AND INNUENDO.
GOOD LUCK AND GOODBYE
The Club is bigger than the individual.
I wanted this to become public to you all because its not fair that the club keeps coping shit on why we let players go.
Now if any of you can't handle the truth than don't reply.
I am not bagging the club, I am actually congratulating them that they had the balls to piss off a player that is trouble.
When I pay money to the club for players to play I want them to give 100% like I do at work and not stuff around with indecent behaviour.
As to the person that told me to F_ _ _ off. I find you immature and irresponsible to be a collingwood follower.
From now on I will do as you wish and never right on here again.
I don't need to reveal my sources.
I was right about gehrig and all the players that got sacked.
I am correct about Mal and also Buckley.
Its not as if a spend countless of hours on here like I have nothing else to do, I do have a live.
Why don't you all at least find out facts before you create bullshit rumours on here.
I was trying to give everyone a legitimate insight into factual information.
I GUESS YOU ALL DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT, INSTEAD YOU WANT RUMOUR AND INNUENDO.
GOOD LUCK AND GOODBYE
-
- Posts: 3137
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 1996 7:01 pm
- Location: Lilydale, Tas.
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 26 times
Member you told a story that slurred Mal Michael's character. I saw no sign of evidence to back up what you were saying. A story without evidence is a rumour - and you're the one that is spreading it.
That's fine, if you want to try your hand at defending yourself in a defamation action, that's your business, go for it.
I'm not going to let you drag me along with you.
That's fine, if you want to try your hand at defending yourself in a defamation action, that's your business, go for it.
I'm not going to let you drag me along with you.
- London Dave
- Posts: 7172
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 1998 7:01 pm
- Location: Iceland on Thames
- Contact:
Have to agree with Mike's call here. The story about Mal may be doing the rounds of every pub in the Southern hemisphere, but to post it on this board would bring a few legal problemos! (And associated costs!) In short, it aint worth it.
I believe the libel laws in the US are slightly more lenient than in Oz (or the UK). There, public figures can cop heaps, with little recourse through the courts.
One must use the magic "alleged" etc, to avoid such things. Having done a bit of journoing part time here (for Aussie press) it is suprising what you think is legit is viewed as suss by the legal eagles.
Member, I'm not bagging you here but rumour, innuendo and factual information???? Come on mate, if your sources are watertight, quote them. Otherwise, its the same as Millwall stories I make up for the Soccer forum! (Even though I know they are true, honestly!)
And lets not forget these type of stories have been going round for years (Alf, can you name the bloke who wound up the window in the celebrate Geelong incident years ago???)
I believe the libel laws in the US are slightly more lenient than in Oz (or the UK). There, public figures can cop heaps, with little recourse through the courts.
One must use the magic "alleged" etc, to avoid such things. Having done a bit of journoing part time here (for Aussie press) it is suprising what you think is legit is viewed as suss by the legal eagles.
Member, I'm not bagging you here but rumour, innuendo and factual information???? Come on mate, if your sources are watertight, quote them. Otherwise, its the same as Millwall stories I make up for the Soccer forum! (Even though I know they are true, honestly!)
And lets not forget these type of stories have been going round for years (Alf, can you name the bloke who wound up the window in the celebrate Geelong incident years ago???)
Sorry Member I might have gone over the top. Australia may have just missed a medal at the time of posting and hence the agro attitude. I remember reading what you said about Gehrig and thinking at the time "good info". So keep posting.
[This message has been edited by magpie_russ (edited 23 September 2000).]
[This message has been edited by magpie_russ (edited 23 September 2000).]