Pre Match: Pies v. Bulldogs - all comments here pls

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
Brown26
Posts: 4070
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Brown26 »

It's not panic stations, we don't have to make wholesale changes, but our team was a little unbalanced against the Lions.

I agree with most people, Medhurst, Davis and Dick are going to be in our best 22 by years end (add Fraser to that as a side point), but I also wouldn't bring Medders back this week - next week if he really tears apart the VFL or even after the break. Fraser doesn't appear to be in contention this week but even so, he's a player that needs to play a lot of football, so I'd bring him back after the break via the VFL (even maybe miss the Swans game).

Dick definitly needs to wait until after the break - and then he has to earn his spot - but his forward pressure will be a great asset to the team me thinks. Davis can come straight in if he's fit, Barham and L Brown are demanding selection and Tarks is, well, Tarks.

The team is too top heavy with Dawes, JA and Cloke, Medhurst WILL be the obvious solution (or maybe Rusling :P ) but not this week, so one of the three (JA on form) gets dropped. We definitly need more forward pressure, so a small forward comes in for JA, and I don't think that's Barham. I'd bring in Tarks if Davis is not fit.

Dropping JA also gives somewhere for L Brown or Wood to rest when they're not rucking. Given than Wood is not setting the world on fire in the AFL and L Brown is in the VFL (albeit at FF) I'd make the switch this week - Jolly can go one out most of the game with Hudson.

Do we need two talls against the Dogs? Probably not, although some insurance for Presti is nice given Hudson / Minson rest down their a bit and Grant looks like a good kid, so I'd probably keep Reid in.

And now the only question is, do we drop OBree for Barham? If Tarks comes in, yes (a team with Tarks, OBree, Ball is going to be quite slow). If Davis comes in, probably still yes. It's time to see what Action Jaxson can do in this midfield mix.

OUT: Wood JA OBree
IN: Davis (or Tarks), L Brown, Barham.

- Ben
User avatar
DaVe86
Posts: 13731
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaVe86 »

great stuff melliot.

I am actually glad we are playing a good opponent. Sometimes crap sides drag us down and get us into bad habbits. It often takes a good side to get the most out of us
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Pants wrote:Thanks for the welcome comrade Pies
And welcome aboard too Pants, on behalf of the more elder but wiser posters on here. I thought your ins and outs were pretty good, I too want Barham in, he has pace and would worry the doggies. :wink:
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
WITTY 35 DAICOS MAGIC
Posts: 1743
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:10 pm
Location: GEELONG
Been liked: 1 time

Collingwood must make changes

Post by WITTY 35 DAICOS MAGIC »

Collingwood will be kidding itself if it doesnt make some forced changes.

Players that barely preform,or are out of position,
And to use an excuse players are in as others are injured,is not an answer.
This weeks game is as important,and is a must for us.

Players like wood,obree will get circles ran round them,
Maccaffer being played out of position,and used a pinch hitter,just like dale thomas of the last 2 years.
Pace is needed against the dogs,and its something that should be looked at seriously.

Collingwood must make 3/4 changes,dont know who but i think playing 2 rucks is costing us,Jolly can play a full game,maybe have leigh brown come in for wood,and have jolly and brown rotate down foward to help dawes and cloke out.
If medhurst and davis dont come up this week,maybe play a lockyer round the packs,but as in saying that brown and lockyer aint winning any stawel gift dash's lately.

Id probably play dick,ok maybe not ready but we have to inject some pace,somewhere.

Im hoping one of davis and medders are ready,

6 pm cant come quick enough.

But if collingwood dont take risks and make a change,i suspect alot of supporters will be majorly disappointed,we are as good as the best,but need to get the right team on the park.

Lets go pies,

Im thinking a 2 goal win,depending on changes.
THEY JUST HATE US
COS THEY AINT US

DAICOS MAGIC 35
VINTAGE DARREN MILLANE 42
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by BBHS »

Wellingham torched these guys last time I hope he is 100%
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Bring in Barham for some more pace, drop Wood for L Brown, we need some mongrel back in too.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Prometheus
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:42 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Prometheus »

Collingwood players are undertalented and overpaid.

Geelong players are overtalented and underpaid.

Simple really.
Pants
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:54 pm

Post by Pants »

Thanks for that Piesnchess, i think i am joining you in the ranks as far as my vintage goes, i don`t know if i fit the wiser category thou,look forward to the varying ramblings on Nicks re- our beloved Pies.
Millane King of the Wing
Legendab
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 11:01 am

Post by Legendab »

kickit2me wrote:Boom boom.

In: Dick
Out: JA
+1 bring back dick!!
Legendab
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 11:01 am

Post by Legendab »

Maybe this is ridiculous radical thinking but does anyone else think it might be worth experimenting with positions and placing Harry O up forward and players like Wood and Cloke up back?

Surely Cloke can't do any worse goal wise and Harry hardly ever seems to miss every time he has opportunity to take a shot.
User avatar
mackasmatt
Posts: 1038
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Perth, WA
Contact:

Post by mackasmatt »

Premiership sides quickly being underpaid, it's the only means of keeping it all together.
------------
----------
MAGPIES '18
----------
------------
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Re: Collingwood must make changes

Post by Tannin »

WITTY 35 DAICOS MAGIC wrote:Collingwood will be kidding itself if it doesnt make some forced changes.
Doh!

Forced changes = changes that are forced. E.g., where there is an injury or a suspension or a retirement. That's what a forced change is, one where you have no choice at all. Any other change for any other reason is NOT a forced change.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^ but with that said, I agree.

IN: Barham, Lockyer, L Brown
OUT: O'Bree, Wood, and one other, can't decide which one.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
mudlark
Posts: 3561
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: Maroochydore Qld
Contact:

Post by mudlark »

Tannin wrote:^ but with that said, I agree.

IN: Barham, Lockyer, L Brown
OUT: O'Bree, Wood, and one other, can't decide which one.
MCCAFFER!!!!!!!
Post Reply