Macaffer could be a decent option to tag Goddard. He can play back pocket, midfield and is obviously a dangerous forward option. He'd match him in the air as well as goes for him size wise.
But Ben Johnson was not as bad as many say last week because he tagged Pearce and held him well.
If Macaffer comes in, it's at the expense of Lockyer. Tarks was hopeless against the Saints in Round 3. Macaffer would be the defensive forward option and could go with Goddard better than Lockyer.
Jack, Cloke and Tarks for Medhurst, Leon and Macaffer.
Pre Match: Pies v. Aints - all comments please
Moderator: bbmods
-
1eyedpie
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:15 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 1 time
If you remember DaVe, Tarks played back pocket the last time we played the saints!DaVe86 wrote:Macaffer could be a decent option to tag Goddard. He can play back pocket, midfield and is obviously a dangerous forward option. He'd match him in the air as well as goes for him size wise.
But Ben Johnson was not as bad as many say last week because he tagged Pearce and held him well.
If Macaffer comes in, it's at the expense of Lockyer. Tarks was hopeless against the Saints in Round 3. Macaffer would be the defensive forward option and could go with Goddard better than Lockyer.
Jack, Cloke and Tarks for Medhurst, Leon and Macaffer.
His days of playing defence are long gone but his nous around goals and the ability of being a link man with his better than good disposal is required against the Saints!
Remember we kicked 4.17 last time with a lot of misses coming from our inexperienced players. Give Tarks the opportunity and he will deliver!
Never disperse your focus unless absolutely necessary. Face one adversary at a time!
BARRACK HARD!
BARRACK HARD!
-
Piesnchess
- Posts: 26202
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 94 times
I have a horrible memory of Tarks in last years final against the saints, when he kicked the ball a mile high straight up, and out on the full. It was woeful, and at a critical game point. McCaffer is the future, and with all due respects, Tarks is not.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
-
melliot
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:14 pm
- Location: Bendigo
^ at least if Tarks gets a shot at goal from 30m out, we can almost put down our glasses. Goal!
The Caff, it's the same situation, but knowing it's a point!
Cheap shot, I know. But probably true.
Like Caff off half back. Not sure about up front.
In: Leon, Medders, Maxwell
Out: Cloke, Hmmm? & Hmmm? ......... I'll get back to you. think music please.
The Caff, it's the same situation, but knowing it's a point!
Cheap shot, I know. But probably true.
Like Caff off half back. Not sure about up front.
In: Leon, Medders, Maxwell
Out: Cloke, Hmmm? & Hmmm? ......... I'll get back to you. think music please.
-
1eyedpie
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:15 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 1 time
1eyedpie wrote:My changes this week would be
In: Medhurst , MaCaffer
Out: Cloke (susp) Johnson (omit)
Back: Harry Presti Goldsack
HB: Toovey Ried Shaw
C: Didak Swan D.Thomas
HF: Beams Dawes Medhurst
F: L.Brown Anthony Sidebottom
Foll: Jolly, Pendlebury, Ball
Int: Lockeyer, Wellingham, MaCaffer, Jarryd Blair
Having rethunk it I would like this line up instead.
In: Medhurst , MaCaffer, Davis
Out: Cloke (susp) Wellingham (omit) Anthony (omit)
Back: Harry Presti Goldsack
HB: Toovey Ried Shaw
C: Didak Swan D.Thomas
HF: Beams Dawes Lockeyer
F: L.Brown Medhurst Davis
Foll: Jolly, Pendlebury, Ball
Int: MaCaffer, Blair, Sidebottom, Johnson
Never disperse your focus unless absolutely necessary. Face one adversary at a time!
BARRACK HARD!
BARRACK HARD!
-
DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
1eyedpie wrote:If you remember DaVe, Tarks played back pocket the last time we played the saints!DaVe86 wrote:Macaffer could be a decent option to tag Goddard. He can play back pocket, midfield and is obviously a dangerous forward option. He'd match him in the air as well as goes for him size wise.
But Ben Johnson was not as bad as many say last week because he tagged Pearce and held him well.
If Macaffer comes in, it's at the expense of Lockyer. Tarks was hopeless against the Saints in Round 3. Macaffer would be the defensive forward option and could go with Goddard better than Lockyer.
Jack, Cloke and Tarks for Medhurst, Leon and Macaffer.
His days of playing defence are long gone but his nous around goals and the ability of being a link man with his better than good disposal is required against the Saints!
Remember we kicked 4.17 last time with a lot of misses coming from our inexperienced players. Give Tarks the opportunity and he will deliver!
all very very good points.
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
-
3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Contact:
-
Raw Hammer
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
- Location: The Gutter
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 4 times
-
Pommie_Magpie
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 6:29 pm
- Location: Mount Lawley, WA
- Contact:
Gold !!!the fuzz wrote:Paul says........PIES!!!rocketronnie wrote:What does Paul The Octopus say? Has he been consulted???
WESTERN MAGPIES - The Official Supporters Club of Western Australia.
Proud Sponsors of Alex Fasolo and Andrew Krakouer in 2012
Visit us at www.westernmagpies.com
Proud Sponsors of Alex Fasolo and Andrew Krakouer in 2012
Visit us at www.westernmagpies.com
