The 2021 Great Big Consolidated Trade & Draft thread
Moderator: bbmods
The journalistic fraud that is Jon Ralph continues on Foxtel's Trading Day Program is concerned. After a great trade today all he and David King could do was use inflammatory and inaccurate words such as:
* decimated draft hand in 2022
* the 2020 trading out of 2021 first .... (debacle)
* delaying the pain
* shall cost them a star
* an extraordinary (current) situation
Fail to recognise that we snared pick 22 for this draft which most likely would be better than our 2022 2nd rounder plus we gain an extra 4th rounder this year and next year. Bloody pathetic. Don't be surprised we also replace the lost 3rd rounder for 2022 with trades for Lynch, Cox etc...
* decimated draft hand in 2022
* the 2020 trading out of 2021 first .... (debacle)
* delaying the pain
* shall cost them a star
* an extraordinary (current) situation
Fail to recognise that we snared pick 22 for this draft which most likely would be better than our 2022 2nd rounder plus we gain an extra 4th rounder this year and next year. Bloody pathetic. Don't be surprised we also replace the lost 3rd rounder for 2022 with trades for Lynch, Cox etc...
Last edited by inxs88 on Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Great call. they need to get list managers on thus show, not "me time" media sycophantsMJ23 wrote:How friggen stupid are these supposed industry experts ?
David King, Montagner after carrying on for 12 months we stuffed up trading our first this year, now we do a deal to easily land the best kid in this years draft they start carrying on about trading our future away next year. I mean aside from the fact we can still trade back in - they are late picks !!
No mention we have access to Dib this year. No mention of all the kids we brought in last year.
Just morons.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
NEVER EVER do we use a second rounder in any deal for a steak knives valued player like Kreuger. Yes it's PTSD from Sam Murray dealCharlie Oneeye wrote:Good move.Macattacks wrote:Should see if Geelong want to swap 32 and 34 (1126 points) for our pick 22 (805 points)
Leaves Geebung with picks 22 and 30 and we have more points for Nick and perhaps a couple of Hine Specials
Do we have to pay in sequence? i.e… From our lowest pick, Say 22.
Or can we retain(skip) 22, and make up the points with lower picks ?
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
- Macattacks
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:09 pm
At least the Hun acknowledged itinxs88 wrote:The journalistic fraud that is Jon Ralph continues on Foxtel's Trading Day Program is concerned. After a great trade today all he and David King could do was use inflammatory and inaccurate words such as:
* decimated draft hand in 2022
* the 2020 trading out of 2021 first .... (debacle)
* delaying the pain
* cost them a star
* an extraordinary (current) situation
Fail to recognise that we snared pick 22 for this draft which most likely would be better than our 2022 2nd rounder plus we gain an extra 4th rounder this year and next year. Bloody pathetic. Don't be surprised we also replace the lost 3rd rounder for 2022 with trades for Lynch, Cox etc...
Collingwood has emerged as the big winner after AFL Trade period day one as it eyes a triple treat.
DETAILS: https://bit.ly/3A8jc3B
Last edited by Macattacks on Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:46 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Moore De Goey
-
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
- Has liked: 74 times
- Been liked: 57 times
The only way to assess is to calculate all of 2020/21/22 draft and trades and weigh it all up then.
No doubt an important aspect of the strategy was to accumulate a young core group as quickly as possible.
We cleared the decks by hook or by crook, and reset in the 2020 draft. We traded out 2021 because it would have been wasted on a player who we can get using points, not position.
Anyway, that's our story. Ignore the goldfish, and let's see how the chapter ends after next year's national draft.
No doubt an important aspect of the strategy was to accumulate a young core group as quickly as possible.
We cleared the decks by hook or by crook, and reset in the 2020 draft. We traded out 2021 because it would have been wasted on a player who we can get using points, not position.
Anyway, that's our story. Ignore the goldfish, and let's see how the chapter ends after next year's national draft.
I’m tipping we go to the draft night with only one of picks 22 and 36.
Why burn both of them on Daicos points when you can do so much more with either one of those picks.
If it got tight for points without 22, we could either walk Lipinski or Krueger to the PSD OR make up any deficit with a late third rounder or two via trades for anyone of Lynch, Cox, Sier or ??
Why burn both of them on Daicos points when you can do so much more with either one of those picks.
If it got tight for points without 22, we could either walk Lipinski or Krueger to the PSD OR make up any deficit with a late third rounder or two via trades for anyone of Lynch, Cox, Sier or ??
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
We've got a handful of players still waiting to see if they'll be retained or delisted.
We've got a few who might garner some mild interest from others and be traded.
Unlike last year we don't have the luxury of using an unlimited amount of picks to match any bid.
With much still be played out in terms of the makeup of our 2022 list I like that we've moved early this trade period to make sure we've already secured the points necessary should a bid come for Daicos at pick 1 and now have time on our side alongside the currency of a whole host of 2021 draft selections that can be used in negotiations for the players we're interested in and those Collingwood players of interest to others.
You sense we aren't finished yet.
We've got a few who might garner some mild interest from others and be traded.
Unlike last year we don't have the luxury of using an unlimited amount of picks to match any bid.
With much still be played out in terms of the makeup of our 2022 list I like that we've moved early this trade period to make sure we've already secured the points necessary should a bid come for Daicos at pick 1 and now have time on our side alongside the currency of a whole host of 2021 draft selections that can be used in negotiations for the players we're interested in and those Collingwood players of interest to others.
You sense we aren't finished yet.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
- Macattacks
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:09 pm
If we get Nick for 1787 points (3rd) you've basically got the best player (3000 points) for over 40% off and plenty left over for Krueger, Lipinski, the mystery third player we are chasing, Dib and a couple of Hine Specials
Not bad for starting off with a packet of chips in the kitty
Not bad for starting off with a packet of chips in the kitty
Last edited by Macattacks on Mon Oct 04, 2021 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moore De Goey
- Macattacks
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:09 pm
[quote="burnsy17"]The mystery player……
By tomorrow morning the story will grow and grow and it’ll be Sam Walsh, Petracca or Buddy
By tomorrow morning the story will grow and grow and it’ll be Sam Walsh, Petracca or Buddy
Last edited by Macattacks on Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moore De Goey
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
To be fair to the club, Sam Murray could have developed into one of the great running defenders of the competition if he had knuckled down.inxs88 wrote:NEVER EVER do we use a second rounder in any deal for a steak knives valued player like Kreuger. Yes it's PTSD from Sam Murray dealCharlie Oneeye wrote:Good move.Macattacks wrote:Should see if Geelong want to swap 32 and 34 (1126 points) for our pick 22 (805 points)
Leaves Geebung with picks 22 and 30 and we have more points for Nick and perhaps a couple of Hine Specials
Do we have to pay in sequence? i.e… From our lowest pick, Say 22.
Or can we retain(skip) 22, and make up the points with lower picks ?
That’s what I mean - we have no money.Pies2016 wrote:We’ll trading pick 22 or 36 would answer half of that question but being able to afford them is the other half that continues to remain unanswered.burnsy17 wrote:I doubt we’d be in the market for anyone decent would we?
I guess we can clear someone out to free up some money?
Beware the swooping Magpie.
^ ^ ^
It’s seems a stretch doesn’t it and ironically, any player who was traded for pick 22 ( just a relative example ) would be worthy of good money.
Cox seems the one who would free us up cap wise and also give us some additional points for even more draft flexibility.. Personally, if Lynch was to to go first, I don’t see them moving Cox on. It’s one or the other but Cox is by far, the bigger contract. I’m sure our trade activity isn’t over yet, so hopefully it proves to be worth waiting for.
It’s seems a stretch doesn’t it and ironically, any player who was traded for pick 22 ( just a relative example ) would be worthy of good money.
Cox seems the one who would free us up cap wise and also give us some additional points for even more draft flexibility.. Personally, if Lynch was to to go first, I don’t see them moving Cox on. It’s one or the other but Cox is by far, the bigger contract. I’m sure our trade activity isn’t over yet, so hopefully it proves to be worth waiting for.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “