Post match: Pies lose another thriller. All comments please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Collingwood Crackerjack
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Collingwood Crackerjack »

Ooohh, and its a bad loss.

Gut-wrenching is the only word I can think of.

I made a call of contenders after the Freo game; not sure after that performance
Last edited by Collingwood Crackerjack on Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
slangman
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by slangman »

Our forwards kicked 3 out of our 9 goals.
Fasolo missed a couple as did Blair and white.
Cloke didn't even have a shot.

Thank f@@k for our midfielders ability to kick goals coz our forwards struggle
On a regular basis
- Side By Side -
User avatar
Flashman
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:03 pm

Post by Flashman »

User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

The_Staunton wrote:Don't know why we continually lose the same way through dumb decision making, awful coaching and poor kicking

Feels like the last 4 years have all been the same

Just gutted, don't see a Premiership coming in a while, or real signs of progress in this group - same things are happening again as the last 3 years

Flat
It's called class and composure, and we don't have it. Can't have the likes of Toovey, Brown and Frost all playing together with only Moore, Langdon and Williams to help. Need Reid and Scharenberg so badly in defence it's not funny. We get ZERO composure out of D50, and very little inside F50. This team needs to evolve to weed out straight out blue collar and balance it with more class. JDG will help...
Last edited by Raw Hammer on Thu Jul 09, 2015 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Est. 2002
User avatar
doriswilgus
Posts: 5350
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: the great southern land
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by doriswilgus »

We lost it at the selection table,pure and simple.Way too top heavy for those conditions.And if Buckley is serious about winning a premiership,he's got to recruit some players with SPEED.We must be the slowest team in the competition,surely.It's all very well to win the contested ball,as Buckley wants,but when the ball gets out in the open,the other teams cut us to pieces.It happens every week.I don't know why he can't see this.
Last edited by doriswilgus on Thu Jul 09, 2015 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Magpietothemax
Posts: 8024
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 31 times

Post by Magpietothemax »

So many here are decrying the possiblities of our team. This loss was gut wrenching in the extreme. In my view because it largely resulted from incorrect balance of talls/runners.
I hold Nathan responsible for this incorrect appraisal, and whoever advises him on developing the weekly gameplan. We need to be far better. Tonight we had about 2 too many talls. He needs to do far better than this
We were also not on tonight. Skill errors in delivery smashed us.
I think that this critical imbalance of talls/runners was the reason we started so badly. Credit to the ferocious determination and grit of our team that we fought back.
But lets be brutally honest. Had they slotted all the opportunities they had, we would have been gone far earlier
The assumption that we can take advantage of a weakened defence is totally unwarranted, because we need to get the ball there. That is the lesson Bucks needs to assimilate. Overconfident in the capacity of our midfield, I would say.
More reflection required.
bkelly123
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 2:18 pm

Post by bkelly123 »

JDG was the only thing that I enjoyed by the end of the day.... He is Effort + composure = exactly what we need more of
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Piesnchess wrote:WE really have to beat the weagles next week, no iffs or butts, it will be our version of Ports game tonight, an absolute, season defining, line in the sand game, we must come out breathing fire next week, no two ways about it. !
Guaranteed loss then. We never 'turn up' in these types of games. The opposition always comes out stronger, just like tonight.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Collingwood Crackerjack
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Collingwood Crackerjack »

Johnno75 wrote:FMD can't buy a win at the moment. 4 losses by 10 pts or less.

Good fight but 1st Qtr cost us tonight basically not on the park and then had to work twice as hard just to get back.
Pretty much; 26 point deficit to makeup, we got to 23
User avatar
GoWoodsmen
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:18 am
Location: Australia

Post by GoWoodsmen »

The_Staunton wrote:Don't know why we continually lose the same way through dumb decision making, awful coaching and poor kicking

Feels like the last 4 years have all been the same

Just gutted, don't see a Premiership coming in a while, or real signs of progress in this group - same things are happening again as the last 3 years

Flat
Please watch the last 3 weeks games again... then watch the same games from this time last year. You cannot be serious?
Side By Side Forever
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12394
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 24 times

Post by eddiesmith »

User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

Still waiting for someone, anyone, to give me an explanation as to why we didn't man up the loose man in defence in the last quarter?
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

thompsoc wrote:Still waiting for someone, anyone, to give me an explanation as to why we didn't man up the loose man in defence in the last quarter?
depends on what our spare man was doing. hard to see on tv.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

thebaldfacts wrote:18 inside 50's in the last quarter, but why did we not man up their loose man?
Maybe the reason we were able to get 18 I50s in the last was because we outnumbered them at the contest. And why are players kicking it into the F50 choosing to blaze to a 2v1?
Museman
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am

Post by Museman »

Post Reply