Post match: Pies down again - All comments please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

Interesting article on Crisp and Gaff. Although I note the journo said Sidey got 32 possessions yesterday when he got 37: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-07-18/p ... jack-crisp
User avatar
Collingwood Crackerjack
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Collingwood Crackerjack »

Varcoe was unreal, he would be near the top of the Copeland in my opinion, along with the usual suspect
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

mackasmatt wrote:How hard is it for people to see that we had an easy draw pre-bye and had hard teams post-bye?
take a look at the eagles' fixture. it has been equally as soft.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Clifton Hill-Billy
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:50 pm
Location: 3068----> 3076
Been liked: 10 times

Post by Clifton Hill-Billy »

Cam wrote:Cmon..

two kicks killed us

Swan's miss on 3 Q siren
Witts miss from free

kick those and perhaps different momentum, different result
Don't forget Sidebum from point blank hitting the post!

Same 2014 shite, different season, next.
"Hey Ma get off the dang roof!"
User avatar
GreekLunatic
Posts: 5598
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: doncaster vic australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 17 times

Post by GreekLunatic »

I reckon the biggest positive of the year is the recruiting of crisp and Varcoe in particular Varcoe i didnt think he would have been that good. We missed Cloke big time. Its time we go after a tall foward White cant cut it
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

We need to get Charlie Dixon big time.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17242
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

Raw Hammer wrote:We need to get Charlie Dixon big time.
That's the big fish we need to land.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

I was listening to a detailed radio discussion about him yesterday - apparently, his management is seeking $750,000 to $800,000 on a 5-year contract (that is, imo, way over the odds). That's a lot of money for a key forward who has been at it for 5 seasons, not played more than 14 games in a year and apparently has some interesting alcohol issues.

To put that in context, Jarryd Blair has played 104 games in the same time (I'm excluding the 12 he played in the second half of 2010) and even Ben Reid has played 70 in the same time (without getting on the senior field at all this season and barely doing so last year). Dixon's aren't the sort of games-played stats you build a forward line around.

I'm not excluding the possibility - but you have to be very concerned about the risk.
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

jackcass wrote:
inxs88 wrote:
jackcass wrote: Pretty sure Seed played on the wing at times tonight. Reality is no matter where he plays there will be times during a game when he'll experience a physical contest. Needs to learn to expect and absorb contact and either battle for a draw or get it off to another player. Actually thought Seed was unlucky to concede the free in the last. We'd laid 70 odd tackles and there were lots where the ball just bubbled out (generally to a Weagles player) that didn't attract frees.

Seedsman apologist. Gee am sure Lance Armstrong might get a rationalised pass from you!
Did a fantastic job winning all those Tours on drugs, I couldn't even find my bike when I was on drugs.

And I fail to see how my post in any way apologises for Seed.
The fact that you're a proponent of him even being in the side (re wing/half forward) suggests your condoning that disgraceful display by him yesterday. As bad as the Matty Ryan days of 1988! No heart for body contact.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

jackcass wrote:
inxs88 wrote:
jackcass wrote: Yeah, let's drop every player who stuffed a F50 entry. Reckon that might make for about 15 changes though.
Toovey apologist!
Doesn't need me apologizing for him. His will be one of the first magnets on the selectors white boards Thursday night.
And if he is and continues to be, it shall explain in the next 2 years why we don't progress as a kicking side and cough it up at vital times!
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
bkelly123
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 2:18 pm

Post by bkelly123 »

The amount of times that both grundy and witts stood far above the pack in the goal square and then couldn't take the mark was ridiculous.... There is no point saying that we can have two in the side and rest 1 at ff if neither of them can actually take a grab. IMO, witts goes to the seconds, moore comes up and plays at ff. He won't necessarily have a big impact early, but his development is critical given our extremely shallow pool of kpp's to choose from....
User avatar
Kwah-LeBaire
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Yeah

Post by Kwah-LeBaire »

Hiss wrote:
Kwah-LeBaire wrote:Well, that was disappointing. All I'm waiting for now is the Hiss & The Rolling Heads show.
Ok so what's your solution ? Big keyboard hero with cheap shots from arse wipe city SA.
Remain calm, Hiss, and do nothing rash.
There is a plan and it is unfolding as it should, even if not as quickly as we'd like.
User avatar
Kwah-LeBaire
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by Kwah-LeBaire »

Jezza wrote:... just enjoy the journey and progress that the club is currently overseeing.
Amen and amen.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

inxs88 wrote:
jackcass wrote:
inxs88 wrote:
Seedsman apologist. Gee am sure Lance Armstrong might get a rationalised pass from you!
Did a fantastic job winning all those Tours on drugs, I couldn't even find my bike when I was on drugs.

And I fail to see how my post in any way apologises for Seed.
The fact that you're a proponent of him even being in the side (re wing/half forward) suggests your condoning that disgraceful display by him yesterday. As bad as the Matty Ryan days of 1988! No heart for body contact.
Yet as recently as April you were loudly advocating the Seed on the HBF in our optimum team if we had no injuries. You've consistently included him in our best 22 right though the preseason. How does it feel to flip and flop on your opinions like a fish out of water?

If nothing else, I endeavour to remain true to my opinions and not change it routinely like you change your tampons.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

John Wren wrote:
mackasmatt wrote:How hard is it for people to see that we had an easy draw pre-bye and had hard teams post-bye?
take a look at the eagles' fixture. it has been equally as soft.
I actually thought they had a softer draw.
Post Reply