US election 2020

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply

Who do you hope wins the US Election?

Trump
9
39%
Biden
9
39%
Don't Care
5
22%
 
Total votes: 23

User avatar
David
Posts: 50659
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 76 times

Post by David »

"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

^ Sorry David. Journalism 101 corroborate your sources. To say I have the evidence without corroboration is simply a nonsense. It’s not because Trump is a pathological liar but what any decent journalist should do.

I have an email from Donald Trump telling me he only wants the best for the USA and he’s never told a lie in his whole life. I think you should publish it now
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
David
Posts: 50659
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 76 times

Post by David »

What was the corroboration for the Pentagon Papers?
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

https://sebotero.github.io/papers/COVID ... 0_2000.pdf
Abstract
We investigate the effects of large group meetings on the spread of COVID-19 by studying the impact of eighteen Trump campaign rallies. To capture the effects of subsequent contagion within the pertinent communities, our analysis encompasses up to ten post-rally weeks for each event. Our method is based on a collection of regression models, one for each event, that capture the relationships between post-event outcomes and pre-event characteristics, including demographics and the trajectory of COVID-19 cases, in similar counties. We explore a total of 24 procedures for identifying sets of matched counties. For the vast majority of these variants, our estimate of the average treatment effect across the eighteen events implies that they increased subsequent confirmed cases of COVID-19 by more than 250 per 100,000 residents. Extrapolating this figure to the entire sample, we conclude that these eighteen rallies ultimately resulted in more than 30,000 incremental confirmed cases of COVID-19. Applying county- specific post-event death rates, we conclude that the rallies likely led to more than 700 deaths (not necessarily among attendees).
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

David wrote:What was the corroboration for the Pentagon Papers?
They checked and rechecked their sources far beyond what “deep throat” told them: that is the had to corroborate the information.

Now the problem with answering a basic question like that is that it immediately gives an equivalent value to the email in question by means of juxtaposition. The independent place where the journo / lawyer worked wanted basic corroboration ( as did the Washington post at the time) before publishing. You’re making an assumption fit your narrative which is unsupported by the facts. Facts can be corroborated.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

Exactly right, WPT. David is making a classic false equivalence error. It is the same error as made by news editors thinking that being "fair" and "even-handed" requires that they give 50% equal time to everything, including hopelessly evidence-free self-interested nutcase groups like climate deniers.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/tr ... n-in-2016/

This is an helpful - and unbiased - explanation of how fivethirtyeight sees the probabilities in the present situation.
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

kill for collingwood!
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

Oh, I agree with that. It's the editing (censoring) of articles that don't follow party lines which is disgraceful and all too common.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^ You articles that don't come up to basic journalistic standards. Get it right.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

My example had nothing to do with editing due to journalistic standards. He is a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist that was been censored due to writing an article questioning the Biden issues.

Of course, that won't interest you because you seem to believe any approach used to battle Trump is fair, which is exactly the point we are making.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Skids wrote:Current SB market for the 2020 presidential election;

Trumpinator $2.55

O'Rourke $6.50
Harris $9
Biden $13
Warren $17

M.Obama $17
Bernie $21
Pence $26
Gabbard $26
Klobuchar $31
Bloomberg $31
Booker $31
Gillibrand $34
Joe Kennedy the third $41
Shapirio $51
Hitlery $51
Oprah $51
Castro $67
Kayne West $201
Beyonc $301
Oscar de la Hoya $401

Stormy Daniels & Wokko $501
That was on 13 January 2019.

As of now:

Biden $1.52
Trump $2.65

https://www.sportsbet.com.au/betting/po ... 20-2982545
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

In trying to get the women’s vote Trump has said this in the last week:

“I love women, more than I love men

& we’re going to help women by getting their men jobs”

His advisors must be pulling their hair out. I love it.

He’s a bit quiet on “grabbing women by their pussies” recently though. Not sure why. He thinks it’s a winner.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Sicks Bux

Post by Sicks Bux »

Pies4shaw wrote:
Skids wrote:Current SB market for the 2020 presidential election;

Trumpinator $2.55

O'Rourke $6.50
Harris $9
Biden $13
Warren $17

M.Obama $17
Bernie $21
Pence $26
Gabbard $26
Klobuchar $31
Bloomberg $31
Booker $31
Gillibrand $34
Joe Kennedy the third $41
Shapirio $51
Hitlery $51
Oprah $51
Castro $67
Kayne West $201
Beyonc $301
Oscar de la Hoya $401

Stormy Daniels & Wokko $501
That was on 13 January 2019.

As of now:

Biden $1.52
Trump $2.65

https://www.sportsbet.com.au/betting/po ... 20-2982545
Would've loved it to have been Gabbard or Bernie. I was thinking of putting a heap of cash on Biden the other day because I think he's a certainty to win the popular vote, but I'm wary about Trump's ability to steal it through a combination of: voter suppression, disqualifying postal votes & contesting the result before the conservative Supreme Court.
Post Reply