The 2021 Great Big Consolidated Trade & Draft thread

masoncox · Post by **masoncox** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:04 pm

[quote="Mr Miyagi"]Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog

Tanuki · Post by **Tanuki** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:09 pm

[quote="Mr Miyagi"]Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog

Mr Miyagi · Post by **Mr Miyagi** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:14 pm

[quote="Tanuki"][quote="Mr Miyagi"]Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog

Macattacks · Post by **Macattacks** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:33 pm

[quote="Mr Miyagi"]Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog

masoncox · Post by **masoncox** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:43 pm

[quote="Macattacks"][quote="Mr Miyagi"]Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog

Macattacks · Post by **Macattacks** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:51 pm

masoncox wrote: It is about us having no decent trade picks or young players to trade

I detected snark, I don't think they like each other

MJ23 · Post by **MJ23** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:04 pm

Pies2016 wrote:
mattdally wrote: Key point he noted re Nick Daicos bid - we are only allowed to use the same number of picks as per available list spots to match the bid.

Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43
Cheers MD. I’m under the impression this is why we have so many unsigned players at the moment. The club will have to continue to run the numbers carefully until it all comes together at crunch time. Obviously Mayne and Greenwood are already off the primary list. Thomas looks in trouble and Lipinski is an upgrade on Sier, so there’s a start. Lynch, Cox and Rantall are all unsigned. Not sure on contract status of Madgen or Chugg ?
They would be looking at trading out a couple during this trade window, delisting others shortly after the trade period and also promising to re sign those left via the rookie draft ( possibly Rantall ) The other option is to keep rolling up those later picks together and turning them into one earlier pick.
It’s just another piece to the AFL F / S bidding process jigsaw.

Yep, its why we havent moved on players but also not contracted them. Its also why I would suggest the offer for Lipinski will be 55 and 58 rather than one pick in the 40's.
We can always pick up the players not contracted if we have list spots available after

5:11pm · Post by **5:11pm** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:09 pm

Macattacks wrote:
masoncox wrote: It is about us having no decent trade picks or young players to trade
I detected snark, I don't think they like each other

Wright just plays with a very straight bat this time of year.

Captain_MyCaptain · Post by **Captain_MyCaptain** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:09 pm

Trent Dumont. thoughts?

https://www.afl.com.au/news/683388/not- ... l-in-limbo

warburton lad · Post by **warburton lad** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:15 pm

Interesting times.

I would suggest that the following will be off the list, one way or another.

Mayne/Greenwood/Tohill/Thomas/Chugg/Lynch/Rantall

I have a feeling Cox will stay- but on a vastly reduced contract

That means we can use the points from our first four picks to get Daicos.

(This assumes that we acquire Kreuger and Lipinski)

I would make a promise to Rantall that we would re-rookie him

5:11pm · Post by **5:11pm** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:23 pm

Captain_MyCaptain wrote:Trent Dumont. thoughts?

https://www.afl.com.au/news/683388/not- ... l-in-limbo

Surely someone will pick him up?

Despite the Eddy Betts/Geelong connection it sounds like we’re still in the hunt for Stengle.

Post by **Pies2016** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:33 pm

Captain_MyCaptain wrote:Trent Dumont. thoughts?

https://www.afl.com.au/news/683388/not- ... l-in-limbo

I rate this guy and having been in a leadership group is always a plus. He was injured most of the first half of this season but I’m not sure we either have the list room or the cap space for anyone else.
Not sure we need another Lipinski distributor type either. We’re at the point about now we should be looking at pace and outside class if we wanted to invest in another quick fix. Naish or Stengle is probably a better fit but it may all come back to whether a spot is available or not.

Macattacks · Post by **Macattacks** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:49 pm

Ess and Rich throwing picks at us for 27

scoobydoo · Post by **scoobydoo** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:43 pm

Macattacks wrote:Ess and Rich throwing picks at us for 27

What could ess possibly offer? They got 11 & then 51

Macattacks · Post by **Macattacks** » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:45 pm

scoobydoo wrote:
Macattacks wrote:Ess and Rich throwing picks at us for 27
What could ess possibly offer? They got 11 & then 51

Rich is offering 38, 42 & 47 (1176 points for pick 27 worth 703 points)

Ess is offering a future pick and maybe 51 (if it's a 2nd rounder it gives us the option to trade our 2022 1st pick)

Dogs want pick 36 for Lipinski and can't take an equivalent bundle of picks for the same points value because they don't have the list spots

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

The 2021 Great Big Consolidated Trade & Draft thread