when did facts , knowledge or balanced thoughts ever get in the way of the real Mike Sheanans articles, Never
Now disect the remainder of the response, and show some character and intelligence "Mike".
Sheehan You wanker
Moderator: bbmods
- Broadie
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 1999 8:01 pm
- Location: VIC
Nine must really wonder why they got Sheehan after the "rabbit-in-the-spotlight" freeze he had last night.
He was unable to give any real justification for Buckley's ranking. The article he had in Tuesday's Hun was even worse: by the justifications he had there, Buckley should be #1!!!
- Argued the others had B&F: Buckley has 5!
- Talked about Brownlow rankings: Buckley is consistently top 5 despite the handicap of playing in a perennially losing team
And the consistency and lack of injuries to Bucks over the past 5 years highlight the additional advantage of DURABILITY.
Broadie
He was unable to give any real justification for Buckley's ranking. The article he had in Tuesday's Hun was even worse: by the justifications he had there, Buckley should be #1!!!
- Argued the others had B&F: Buckley has 5!
- Talked about Brownlow rankings: Buckley is consistently top 5 despite the handicap of playing in a perennially losing team
And the consistency and lack of injuries to Bucks over the past 5 years highlight the additional advantage of DURABILITY.
Broadie
If people want to tell Mike Sheehan directly what you think of him or his stupid articles, email him at the herald sun website.
heraldsun.com.au
P.S. A couple of weeks ago Sheehan wrote that it is time to hate the Magpies again..(or in a couple of years, i think he said) lol.. Thats just a joke. What has he been doing the last couple of years?
Go PIES 2001
heraldsun.com.au
P.S. A couple of weeks ago Sheehan wrote that it is time to hate the Magpies again..(or in a couple of years, i think he said) lol.. Thats just a joke. What has he been doing the last couple of years?
Go PIES 2001