Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:08 pm
by Joel
I would like to keep. But do we even know it was Tarrant? By the sounds of it we don't.
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:09 pm
by PiesFan
If Chris Judd had a history of problems off the field, would you still want him in our club?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:12 pm
by Johnson#26
YES!
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:18 pm
by PiesFan
Well then then i guess that answers Samuels question ehehe.
Although Taz is not equivalent to a Judd.
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:52 am
by fan4collingwood
Boys will be boys!!
Geezzzzzzzzz, they are on holidays aren't they!!
Give them all some slack will you.
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:22 am
by 3rd degree
too right. How would the boston bun sell papers if they were all angels
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:59 am
by bokka
Who gives a shawarma what the players do in their spare time, they are there to play footy. What happenned to living in a free country??
Also everyone wants aggro mongrel players but wants them to be goody-goody angels off the field - that is a tall order, how many fit that bill? Not enough to go round I can tell you. Tame them off the field and they're likely to lose the edge on the field.
Why do you think they let Roman soldiers run riot before their battles? How well do you think they would have fought after being forced to do boy scout duty under clucking supervision??