This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Brown26 wrote:another for no - Taz is a gun, he's the best player of his type going round, bloody hard to match up on, works hard on the ground, marks well, leads well, still got a lot of years in him. We cna get another midfileder who is almost as good as Judd, we can't get another Tarrant, cause there isn't one.
Well i think there is another Taz around (in Riewoldt and others) but what i think your point was leading to was that its much easier to get a great midfielder like Judd then a class forward like Taz. Someone like Travis Johnstone can easily play the role that Judd would play, but we would be extremely hard pressed to find someone like taz, particularly in this years trade period.
So the answer would be no, but theres no way the weagles would trade Judd for taz anyway.
Gun forwards are hard to come by.
I'd have to stick with Taz, even though I think Judd is a gun!
A super gun in fact.
I expect big things from Taz next season and I'm sure he will not let down the Collingwood faithful. A forward line of Taz, Rocca, Cloke, Fraser, Buckley, Didak, Davis, and Davidson, will make it difficult for a lot of defences to contain.
I'm drewlling just thinking about!
Con Nose Evrythin, you see
"Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol"
I'd go for it. Tarrant has the potential to be a gun, but he also has the potential to slide into oblivion. Judd on the other hand, will be one of the best for the next 10 years.
I agree CBW the potential forward line is a ripper, but we need to get the ball down there quickly and accurately.
ConBigWig wrote:I expect big things from Taz next season and I'm sure he will not let down the Collingwood faithful. A forward line of Taz, Rocca, Cloke, Fraser, Buckley, Didak, Davis, and Davidson, will make it difficult for a lot of defences to contain.
When you put it like that it is certainly an exciting prospect, If all these guys can have a solid preseason and stay fit during the season we should have a very potent foward line indeed.
roar wrote:I'd go for it. Tarrant has the potential to be a gun, but he also has the potential to slide into oblivion. Judd on the other hand, will be one of the best for the next 10 years.
I agree CBW the potential forward line is a ripper, but we need to get the ball down there quickly and accurately.
I don't know though, I get the feeling Judd's more likely to try and kick the goal himself than deliver to the forwards at this stage.
The scary thing is he pulls it off a lot of the time
Mags, he was...what...19 when he went back to Mildura. I don't think you can judge his current state of mind, based on something that happened 5 years ago.
Who is going to kick goals if Tarrant leaves? I don't know how we would fill the hole.
Last edited by Joel on Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tarrant more important than Judd, are we serious. One is a Brownlow winner, consitent ball winner, future leader and what not and the other is an inconsistent forward that can't get his shit together off the field. I'd take Judd over Tarrant every day of the week and Collingwood would to.
i would much rather Judd at Collingwood than Tarrant, Judd has a great attitude compared to Tazza and is alot more consistant. I will admit it would be hard to replace a Tarrant (we have alot of up and coming tall forwards) but i think in the end you would get a much better return from Judd. I wouldn't be saying this trade would never happen, Eagles need a forward and Collingwood will need a top of the line midfielder in the next couple of years to replace Nathan Buckley when he retires.
