Tex Walker for The Chad

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

MarkT
Posts: 1350
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melb

Post by MarkT »

People who want to trade Presti.
People who say he'll play FB or CHB next year.

There are quite a few from what I can gather.
User avatar
Nicko
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nicko »

I disagree with MarkT. I thought Walker was an awkward player lacking confidence, up until about halfway through 2004. Over the second half of the season he showed plenty as a tall defender. He hits contests hard. He has a big leap and is quick, so makes most contests. I didn't see him get "beaten badly" late 2004. Key defensive post next year in my opinion.
User avatar
themilleys
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:59 pm

Post by themilleys »

[. This may well change as he plays more but right now he is an athletic but ineffective forward and a backman who gets beaten badly and can be heavily scored against.



His best game was v Sydney in 2003 and even then he basically had 1 quarter where he got a couple of hit outs and took a mark.


I am more than happy to keep Tex and try and develop him because if it all clicks for him he will be a fantastic asset as a quick, agile strong key position player but his development will either be at Williams town for the best part of the next 2 years or we will have to accept little positive impact from one member of the 22 for a long term pot4ential gain.

.[/quote]

Firstly who has he been badly beaten by and who has kicked multiple goals on him?

His best games where against Essendon and the Bulldogs in 2004 and he played very consistantly for Williamstown all year.

And to say he will be a negative playing the firsts is ridiculous.
d9 tank
Posts: 700
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Post by d9 tank »

The only reason I have said we should not trade Walker is:

- He has shown improvement in every single year he's been at the club, unlike many of our other younger players

- His form at Williamstown this season and in the B&W in the latter part of the year was very good

- His potential is enormous

- He is still very young

- His trade value is low.

I have no dillusions of the player Walker will be in 2005. The fact that we've retained Presti means '05 will be another developmental year for him, but under no circumstances should a player who continues to improve, shows such massive potential at such a young age and has such little trade value be given any consideration as a trade. Walker will be in the seniors for the most part of 2005 and should get plenty of game time all around the ground, but he is still a year off the FB/CHB many want him to be.
User avatar
themilleys
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:59 pm

Post by themilleys »

I agree D9

2005 will be the year in which he will be groomed for a specific key position and he will develop along the lines of learning positioning, tactics, specific skills and strength enhancement for that particular role.
User avatar
rand corp
Posts: 3912
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: south east asia
Contact:

Post by rand corp »

Sobering thoughts
User avatar
Johnson#26
Posts: 24763
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am

Post by Johnson#26 »

I for one, don't not have my hopes pinned on Tex, but expect him to play 150 odd games for the clubs.

Mark - he is a footballing frankinstein. No football brain, textbook skills and good hands. He has great despirtation and simply must be kept. Could be one of the best finds of the 2002 draft.
Post Reply