Page 2 of 15
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:04 pm
by scoobydoo
Brown-backman
Reid- backman
Cloke-forward
Grundy- ruckman
Witts- ruckman
Frost-backman
Keeffe-backman
Only one forward in that lot of KPP's.
Jesse White us only average.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:00 pm
by The Prototype
RudeBoy wrote:I too had big hopes for White. As it stands, if we get Clark, I wonder if the club might consider trading White, since with Witts, Grundy, Gault and even Cox, he'd basically be surplus to requirements?
I'd doubt it, I cannot imagine Cox would have any trade value after we'd only just signed him as a rookie. I'd imagine Gault and Grundy will be given more time to develop with the possibility of Witts and White possibly rucking a bit more with Clark maybe doing it from the forward line.
Plus with Clark suffering all those injuries I'd think keeping the other guys around might be a smarter more.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:07 pm
by Meddler80
Pies4shaw wrote:Perhaps we could just trade White for Clark - if Clark never plays a game, he will still be better for us.
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:51 am
by Brown26
White is better as a third tall forward / second ruck. He's not a FF or CHF IMO, so if we want to play Reid back, then White would be good. But I don't reckon he'll be much chance of getting on the park will he?
- Ben
Mitch Clark
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:05 am
by Heizenberg
Should we be trying to get him? Is he better than Jesse White?
Re: Mitch Clark
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:09 am
by Culprit
Heizenberg wrote:Should we be trying to get him? Is he better than Jesse White?
Danger Will Robinson Danger.
Do you want a guy with known mental issues (depression) to come and play at a club where he would be under even more scrutiny?
Re: Mitch Clark
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:11 am
by think positive
Heizenberg wrote:Should we be trying to get him? Is he better than Jesse White?
Welcome
But Jessie doesn't like your post Mr White!
Re: Mitch Clark
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:29 am
by Heizenberg
think positive wrote:Heizenberg wrote:Should we be trying to get him? Is he better than Jesse White?
Welcome
But Jessie doesn't like your post Mr White!
don't you worry about pinkdman I got this...
Re: Mitch Clark
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:44 am
by Heizenberg
Culprit wrote:Heizenberg wrote:Should we be trying to get him? Is he better than Jesse White?
Danger Will Robinson Danger.
Do you want a guy with known mental issues (depression) to come and play at a club where he would be under even more scrutiny?
I sense danger aswell
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:17 am
by inxs88
DANGER "I AM THE DANGER"!
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:37 am
by think positive
But I'm the one who knocks
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:46 pm
by Darkstranger
Seriously, can 10 year olds please not add to this forum!
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:54 pm
by Az
The trend has been to start a new Mitch Clark thread every week. Not even sure if it's in the sticky posting rules, but can these twelvies at least check if there's an existing thread?
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:19 pm
by Albert Parker
Bucks quoted from ABC Radio today as having strong interest in Clark.
Therapist thinks he needs a new club to start fresh. Hmmm. Anyhow good for us if we can grab him for cheap. The kid can seriously play.
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:38 pm
by watt price tully
^ Further to AC's comments about Bucks on radio:
On 774 radio this afternoon Bucks was asked what was happening with H said:
Friendly relations, not as acute as described by media, that H deserves to have a rejuvenated career, that in this day & age it is less common for a player over so many career games to be at one club. (In short, if the right deal is struck he's gone).
This was said with the admission that Collingwood basically want Clark & have seen him on 2-3 occasions & are doing their due diligence.