Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:16 pm
by bwphantom
H and our 3rd for Watts and their 3rd.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:47 pm
by swoop42
Hate to be a party pooper but there is a chance Melbourne might have to use pick 22 to secure father son player Stretch.
That would be a major blow because if they offer up pick 22 for H we should accept it then run like buggery.
Potentially we could end up with picks 4, 8, 22, 24 and 28.
Hine can work some magic with that.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:54 pm
by jackcass
themonk wrote:jackcass wrote:Lazza wrote:
Oh well FWIW, Geeling got Clarke so it is a moot point now......
Nothing is done and dusted until paperwork lodged at the AFL during the trade period.
Really? how will Geelong ever come up with a 2nd or 3rd round pick
Not saying they don't have the capacity, just that nothing is certain until paperwork is lodged, particularly with a player of Clark's history.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:03 pm
by jackcass
swoop42 wrote:Hate to be a party pooper but there is a chance Melbourne might have to use pick 22 to secure father son player Stretch.
That would be a major blow because if they offer up pick 22 for H we should accept it then run like buggery.
Potentially we could end up with picks 4, 8, 22, 24 and 28.
Hine can work some magic with that.
F/S would lock up their pick so could be a problem if it's pick 2 for Stretch. End of 1st round pick compo for Frawley would work equally well.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:17 pm
by boom
We won't get 22 for H, we'll be offered whatever Geelong give up for Clark. Probably their second rounder, 33 or so.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:21 pm
by swoop42
Then we reject it.
If they can give 23 for Vince then Collingwood will demand 22 for H.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:24 pm
by boom
Can we? Adelaide were desperate to get into the draft following the Tippett sanctions... and if a deal didn't get done Vince would have stayed at Adelaide without issue. There is no way Harry is staying. Don't get me wrong I'd love 22, but we'll be offered what they get from the Cats.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:46 pm
by jackcass
H is still contracted isn't he
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:10 pm
by Harvey
Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:12 pm
by woftam
Harvey wrote:Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick.
Not a bad outcome really.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:34 am
by Podpicken
woftam wrote:Harvey wrote:Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick.
Not a bad outcome really.
I'd take that.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:18 am
by thompsoc
Take pick 22 and ruuuuunnnnnn!
It is a good deal!
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:25 am
by Rick
I've heard a lot from Hine about our age profile 22-25. I wonder if a straight swap for Tapscott could be considered.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:54 am
by jackcass
Tough to even speculate until the F/S and FA stuff gets sorted. An exchange of 2nd round picks and their 3rd round pick wouldn't be to bad. What compo they get for Frawley will influence their preparedness to look at that though, as will what they get for Clark. Will the Dees F/S Stretch, what will he cost, will they have to commit their 2nd round pick? And what happens if Moore miraculously slips to our 2nd round pick and we no longer have that available.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 3:09 pm
by swoop42
If Moore slips to our second rounder they can literally have H for some steak knives.
It must be a pack of 6 though.
LOL.