Rate the crossbenchers

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

This could be pretty funny:

http://www.news.com.au/national/palmer- ... 7121682591

Imagine if she challenged for the leadership of the Clive Palmer Party and won? Would that make her Clive Palmer or would the party's name have to be changed? :?
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29544
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 350 times

Post by Jezza »

The way things are heading, I think Lambie is going to run as an independent in the next federal election.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
1061
Posts: 2055
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 2:05 pm

Post by 1061 »

Jezza wrote:The way things are heading, I think Lambie is going to run as an independent in the next federal election.
She might be flocked by then.

Which is a pity because I think she went into politics with better intentions than say Julia or Julie but the machine hasn't finished with her yet.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17242
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

I would rate them 11 out of 10 as of yesterday. Now the major parties will have to deal with 4 people in the upper house.

I feel PUP is just about dead.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

^ As much as the idea of Lambie working on her own scares me, getting rid of the Palmer party's balance of power can only be a good thing, right?

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/ ... 1ngip.html

Okay, so maybe not. Please wake me up when this is all over. :cry:
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Wow you are very polite. I am fully conscious.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54841
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

Lambie is apparently coming under some grief from the ADF because she owes them money.

And in unrelated news, I saw yesterday that Pauline Hanson is planning a comeback.

So does this mean we may see the natural joining of two related forces into the One Ginger Lambie big package party?
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17242
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

stui magpie wrote:Lambie is apparently coming under some grief from the ADF because she owes them money.

And in unrelated news, I saw yesterday that Pauline Hanson is planning a comeback.

So does this mean we may see the natural joining of two related forces into the One Ginger Lambie big package party?
Paulines $$ have run out, she knows she won't win but gets $3 a vote.

Lambie will cop heaps because now she is voting against the current Government, she was OK whilst she was for them. Hmmm Peter Slipper comes to mind. lol
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Oops. Too much data.
User avatar
1061
Posts: 2055
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 2:05 pm

Post by 1061 »

Culprit wrote: Hmmm Peter Slipper comes to mind. lol


But I actually think she has bigger hee hee's than Slipper.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29544
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 350 times

Post by Jezza »

Very impressive first speech by Ricky Muir!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBFnGnV0Dv8
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

While I still think it's a joke that he got in, I was impressed by his article in The Age about unemployment earlier in the week. It was refreshing to read a politician empathise with people on the dole through his own lived experience, not some theoretical concept of how the other half might live.

As the accompanying article pointed out, it's very rare for someone from a genuine working-class background to get a seat in parliament these days. Perhaps we could do with more Ricky Muirs.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Skids
Posts: 9940
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 44 times

Post by Skids »

Why don't you run? You'd be amazingly incredible.
Don't count the days, make the days count.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

I genuinely believe I could do better than at least some of the people we've elected. But then, I think you could too, and that's saying something.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Post Reply