Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.
Moderator: bbmods
ronrat
Posts: 4932 Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Thailand
Post
by ronrat » Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:53 am
Immanuel kant was a real pissant and very rarely stable.
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
HAL
Posts: 45105 Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:
Post
by HAL » Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:57 am
When was this exactly?
David
Posts: 50683 Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times
Post
by David » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:01 am
ronrat wrote: Immanuel kant was a real pissant and very rarely stable.
Next thread: "Deontologists vs utilitarians: who's better?"
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Mountains Magpie
Posts: 1762 Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: Somewhere between now and then
Post
by Mountains Magpie » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:16 am
Tannin wrote: As for Soros and Buffet, as billionaires go they are half-decent middle-of-the-road types.
Do you mean Soros is a half-decent billionaire or a half-decent human being?
Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion