Roe vs Wade overturned in the US

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
David
Posts: 50659
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 76 times

Post by David »

swoop42 wrote:I've read that polls consistently show between 60 to 70 percent of Americans support a woman's right to abortion and yet 100% of these Republicans seemingly don't.

So much for the separation between church and state.

This should be a wake up call for every Australian also who respects a women's right to choose as it's pretty obvious that organised religion in this country (just like America) is increasingly looking to infiltrate political parties (the Coalition in particular) with candidates to stay relevant and influential as their congregation numbers fall year on year.
Really? A friend was saying something similar the other day, but I’m pretty sceptical. Abortion is just not the same cultural lightning rod here, and seeing Bernie Finn get dumped on by Liberals the other day for his post suggests this is a marginal position even on the right here. Even Abbott, one of the most prominent anti-abortion politicians of the last generation, got to be PM and still wouldn’t touch it with a barge pole.

The fact is that even in the far more religiously conservative US, there’s simply no way they could get a ban passed electorally; as you say, the majority of the population are opposed, so the only viable tactic is to sneak it through an ideologically appointed supreme court, which doesn’t exist here. If anything, Christian political lobbyists have gone steadily backwards here over the past two decades. So I don’t see any reason to be worried about it happening here.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54828
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 160 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

Yep, the Church is losing it's power and has been for ages. Just look at Ireland where the Church used to rule but now has same sex marriage and legal abortion.

the US is a funny case as the traditional churches don't have as much sway.

My view is that the Libs try to pander to the increasingly small number of relgious idealogues as it's still a cohort of voters but as you said with Abbott and Abortion it's only small stuff.

Every state in Australia has legal abortion, any government who tried to change that would be arseholed out at the next election.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40237
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 337 times
Been liked: 103 times

Post by think positive »

Saw a post that said something like “we will guarantee your child protection before birth but we can promise to keep the safe til recess.

On a current affair they were talking about extended the reach to sodomy etc.

I just can’t believe such a step backwards.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20107
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 31 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Pies4shaw wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
From what I understand, it's the correct decision from the perspective of the US Constitution.

As Alito wrote. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

While it now falls to the hands of States to regulate, it is also possible for the Congress to now try to legislate abortion, which could go two ways, including if the Republicans get control of the House and Senate, they might very well legislate to make abortion illegal.

It makes the midterms interesting.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

There is no "correct decision from the perspective of the US Constitutrion". There are merely two competing theories of interpretation, one conservative, one not.

If you care, I commented on the legislative position on the previous page.
User avatar
Skids
Posts: 9937
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 44 times

Post by Skids »

The sheer number of abortions shocked me.

According to WHO, every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion , there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.
https://www.worldometers.info/abortions/

The rate of abortion in the USA (20.8/1000), is very similar to NZ (19.7) & Australia (19.7). The 3 countries ranking 15th, 17th & 18th respectively.

Russia (53.7), Vietnam (35.2) & Kazakhstan (35) have the highest rates.

Mexico has the least with just 0.1/1000

Portugal, Qatar, India, Spain, Germany.South Africa, Austria, Greece, Croatia, Switzerland & Belgium are other countries with very low rates of abortion.
Don't count the days, make the days count.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54828
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 160 times

Post by stui magpie »

The Supreme Court is supposed to make decisions based on law, not morals. There's an argument they got it right in the legal sense, that now leaves it up to the states and the people in those states.

@Skids, yeah there are a lot of abortions. Considering the preventative measures readily available abortion shouldn't be the primary measure of birth control, but if a women gets pregnant and for whatever reason doesn't want to have a child, she should have the right to terminate that pregnancy without judgement.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

https://www.npr.org/2021/06/09/10025938 ... ress-tests

Well, the Supreme court certainly is minority rule now and that's on the back of the American political system.

For mine the quickest and easiest way to ease the politicization of the Supreme Court is to introduce term limits.

I kind of figure if a President is limited to 8 years then that's a good enough starting point for any Supreme Court appointee.

P.S- How can Clarence Thomas possibly be allowed to remain as a Supreme Court justice when he clearly has a conflict of interest due to his marriage?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03 ... t-messages
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54828
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 160 times

Post by stui magpie »

Introducing term limits is good in theory but won't happen easily.

The simplest and most complicated way forward is at the ballot box. If enough people care enough to vote for Pro-Choice , then politicians will listen. It's a state by state situation.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50659
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 76 times

Post by David »

I'm not totally across the situation there, but my impression is that there's a massive partisan gulf: the blue states will continue to have overwhelming public support for abortion rights and legislate accordingly, but the red states will use this ruling to further crack down on them. Perhaps, in some of the latter, a pro-choice ballot measure might be able to get up even under a Republican state government, but it seems likely that abortion will be made all but (if not entirely) illegal in most southern states and that this will reflect the will of the majority in those jurisdictions.

What I'd be fascinated to figure out is what, if anything, the Democratic Party leadership is proposing apart from their own version of "thoughts and prayers" (i.e. saying how angry and sad they are). They have the presidency and both houses of congress, and yet on nearly every issue that their voters consider priorities (abortion, gun control, voter rights, healthcare, etc.), they seem to be completely impotent. Is there any actual strategy right now? Is anyone even able to propose one?
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

^They definitely are working to circumvent it. Here's an article I noticed the other day, but there have been many more:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/23/opin ... igion.html
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
David
Posts: 50659
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 76 times

Post by David »

Little cause for optimism in that piece, at any rate. Progressive-leaning states can and will find loopholes where they can. But these are piecemeal responses that won't do much of anything to help people living under Republican state administrations, and at the federal level things are looking very bleak indeed.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

That's the problem with having a shabby national court, on which the judges play politics openly.

By way of example, Thomas' specifically-foreshadowed targets, derived from the same interpretation that he just trashed in Dobbs, include gay marriage and contraceptives but not the ability of blacks and whites to marry (presumably, he thinks that might hit a little too close to home).

Make no mistake, most of the bits of America that we don't actually hate derive from the jurisprudence of prior Supreme Courts.

With a bit of luck, they'll decriminalize the KKK, too.
Post Reply