Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:28 pm
Rioli made formal complaints in 2018. It was swept under the rug. AFL knew of this.
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://magpies.net/
Not in public they didn’t but a few ex players did state that their recollections were vastly different to Lumumbas. Unfortunately in this day and age, they thought that it was safer for them to just keep it to themselves.David wrote:Not really. Nobody has actually ever tried to dispute any of his claims about what happened in his time at the club, just tear down his character, which I think says a lot in its own right.slangman wrote:A bit like the Lumumba allegations at Collingwood, the truth of actual events depends on who you ask.
Or a NSW journo decided to break ranks and kill off AFL's marquee week.Mr Miyagi wrote:Interesting timing too. Hawks must have been told a month ago to sit on it until after the grand final, but conscience (rightly) got the better of someone. There’s racism at other clubs too who should own it and step up, not stay silent and hope the spotlight doesn’t point their way.
Good point.Cam wrote:Or a NSW journo decided to break ranks and kill off AFL's marquee week.Mr Miyagi wrote:Interesting timing too. Hawks must have been told a month ago to sit on it until after the grand final, but conscience (rightly) got the better of someone. There’s racism at other clubs too who should own it and step up, not stay silent and hope the spotlight doesn’t point their way.
I was thinking the same thing - what would it do at brisbane if Fagan had of been named a week ago. Not that it mattered but perhaps it shows that Fagan still has friends.Mr Miyagi wrote:Interesting timing too. Hawks must have been told a month ago to sit on it until after the grand final, but conscience (rightly) got the better of someone. There’s racism at other clubs too who should own it and step up, not stay silent and hope the spotlight doesn’t point their way.
I saw the exchange (actually on Facebook) in real time and even participated in it. Buckley had no idea what he was talking about and was making claims about things that preceded his time at the club, Lumumba's rebuttal (which was posted here on Nick's somewhere; should be able to be found through the search function) was pretty decisive, and Buckley soon retreated with his tail between his legs. So this wasn't a he said / he said situation at all.slangman wrote:Not in public they didn’t but a few ex players did state that their recollections were vastly different to Lumumbas. Unfortunately in this day and age, they thought that it was safer for them to just keep it to themselves.David wrote:Not really. Nobody has actually ever tried to dispute any of his claims about what happened in his time at the club, just tear down his character, which I think says a lot in its own right.slangman wrote:A bit like the Lumumba allegations at Collingwood, the truth of actual events depends on who you ask.
Simon Buckley was the only ex player that questioned Lumumba publicly from what I can recall and that twitter discussion quickly deteriorated into Lumumba mocking Buckley’s footballing ability without ever actually dismissing Buckley’s claim about introducing himself by the nickname that was at the centre of the racism allegations.