Yeah the first 10 minutes will be crucial to gauge the mindset and if they are fully switched on. If they aren’t, we are in trouble because opposition teams have worked out the coming from behind method we have used in recent last quarters and have prepared strategies to counter it. A handy lead at half time will be useful as well. I’m fairly positive of a win by 16 pts in a concerned kinda wayPiesnchess wrote: First 10 mins will tell us if we have come to play, and I reckon we will. This is a must win to get season back on track. Woods by 22 points.
Game On! Pies v. Cats. Updates, all comments.
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 93 times
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm
Piesnchess wrote:Haff wrote:^wish I shared your optimism PnC. Personally I think Ginni is a massive chance to not be on our list post next season. “Trade for more opportunities” when really, he doesn’t have it.
Still a kid. A lot of water under that bridge. Gun to my head, that’s my bet.
Hope you’re right. Need this shot in the arm. Been a very bleak week footy wise.
Ginni will stay mate, too much potential there. I forgot to mention, two players that MUST stand up tonight are Checkers and Mitchell, both been pretty below average for some weeks now, and Darcy must get back to his intercepting, attacking style, no Hawkins helps, I guess he takes Cameron and Howe gets that dork Rohan. Yes, this is a true line in the sand match, time to hit back hard
Add De Goey to that list, has been extremely disappointing the last month, save for a few flashes of skills.
"To know nothing of events before your birth, is to forever remain a child" - Cicero (Roman Lawyer/Senator) 46 BCE.
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
Obviously taking the view that the poor performance in the midfield was not a personnel issue, but was a mindset issue. Fly is backing in JDG to step up. I think Tay Adams will be sent to the centre clearances far more as well.Mr Miyagi wrote:I’m hoping we’re foxing and we’re saving some surprises for the finals.npalm wrote:Am I missing something? We were smashed in the midfield last week and we've lost two midfielders due to injury but we've only included one mid in the "ins" to replace them. Doesn't seem to make sense.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Ice in the veins
- Gerry Cooper
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:49 am
- Has liked: 209 times
- Been liked: 47 times
I think Geelong will throw everything at us this game. They need the win to keep their premiership defence alive and they will not be going down lightly. We need a 100% lift in effort across all lines to win this one.
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.�
Phoofy to ND reliance It’s been a general across the field drop in our form
In all areas -backs mids forwards
The less than good mids & centre clearance has us playing more in our back half than attacking half
Let’s correct those and team gelling first
In all areas -backs mids forwards
The less than good mids & centre clearance has us playing more in our back half than attacking half
Let’s correct those and team gelling first
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
- Raw Hammer
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
- Location: The Gutter
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 4 times
Win this and Top 2 still isn’t guaranteed. If Melb and Bris win their final three games and we lose our final two, we’re all on same points and percentage will come into play. We threw our percentage advantage down the drain the past fortnight.
Anyway, just win.
When discussing Howe forward and other moves, I reckon Fly had a glint in his eye and said something about not revealing all before finals. I reckon we’re trying to secure Top 2 without showing all our finals-moves cards. Unfortunately, we might have to play some of them now just to keep our Top 2 spot intact, which I can only assume wasn’t part of the plan a fortnight ago.
Again … just win.
Anyway, just win.
When discussing Howe forward and other moves, I reckon Fly had a glint in his eye and said something about not revealing all before finals. I reckon we’re trying to secure Top 2 without showing all our finals-moves cards. Unfortunately, we might have to play some of them now just to keep our Top 2 spot intact, which I can only assume wasn’t part of the plan a fortnight ago.
Again … just win.
Est. 2002
The whole forward line needs to lift
I’m not sold on McStay
And we need Cox to ruck
Thinking it’s Hill Frampton Mitchell McStay in that order who have done well this season
McStay is the weak link
Agree don’t play our cards just yet
And if we don’t and we win it’s a bonus
It’s dry conditions and perfect weather as well
No excuses
I’m not sold on McStay
And we need Cox to ruck
Thinking it’s Hill Frampton Mitchell McStay in that order who have done well this season
McStay is the weak link
Agree don’t play our cards just yet
And if we don’t and we win it’s a bonus
It’s dry conditions and perfect weather as well
No excuses
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
Well, Sidebottom was awful in the midfield last week (probably played injured) while Nick Davis spent most of his time at full forward. Markov comes into the side at half back, freeing up Crisp to play midfield.npalm wrote:Am I missing something? We were smashed in the midfield last week and we've lost two midfielders due to injury but we've only included one mid in the "ins" to replace them. Doesn't seem to make sense.
No wonder we lostMatthewBoydFanClub wrote:Well, Sidebottom was awful in the midfield last week (probably played injured) while Nick Davis spent most of his time at full forward. Markov comes into the side at half back, freeing up Crisp to play midfield.npalm wrote:Am I missing something? We were smashed in the midfield last week and we've lost two midfielders due to injury but we've only included one mid in the "ins" to replace them. Doesn't seem to make sense.
-
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 93 times
Mr Miyagi wrote:No wonder we lostMatthewBoydFanClub wrote:Well, Sidebottom was awful in the midfield last week (probably played injured) while Nick Davis spent most of his time at full forward. Markov comes into the side at half back, freeing up Crisp to play midfield.npalm wrote:Am I missing something? We were smashed in the midfield last week and we've lost two midfielders due to injury but we've only included one mid in the "ins" to replace them. Doesn't seem to make sense.
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm