Liberal leadership declared vacant.
Moderator: bbmods
- Dark Beanie
- Posts: 4859
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 12:41 pm
- Location: A galaxy far, far away.
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 26 times
Yesterday at the same time the Liberal leadership was blowing up, my nephew (who is in the army) posted a message that he was part of a group - Tank, AV, howitzer guns, that rolled into Canberra. He was quite amused at the looks he was getting from the locals
If you are foolish enough to be contented, don't show it, but just grumble with the rest. - Jerome K Jerome
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54842
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54842
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
The solicitors general's opinion does not confirm or deny Duttons ineligibility to be a sitting MP. The undertakers undertakings look politically damaging for the undertaker. It needs to go to the high court.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54842
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Find a lawyer who will ever say 100% to anything. It's always an educated opinion and there's always caveats.watt price tully wrote:The solicitors general's opinion does not confirm or deny Duttons ineligibility to be a sitting MP. The undertakers undertakings look politically damaging for the undertaker. It needs to go to the high court.
Here's the full decision. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... utton.html
My summary would be Dutton is not ineligible based on known facts, but there is other information not provided that may possibly impact that (unknown so can't say) and you can't predict how the High Court will rule on some of these things. So, there is risk. Not enough for the Libs to refer him, but if he wins the leadership you can guarantee Labor will keep pushing it.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Dark Beanie wrote:Yesterday at the same time the Liberal leadership was blowing up, my nephew (who is in the army) posted a message that he was part of a group - Tank, AV, howitzer guns, that rolled into Canberra. He was quite amused at the looks he was getting from the locals
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- David
- Posts: 50683
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 83 times
Apparently someone threw some bricks through Dutton's office windows last night.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-24/v ... d/10159424
Lead suspects are the Socialist Alternative, Antifa, Turnbull loyalists, disaffected local constituents, Labor groupies, general hoodlums, Liberal Party members, refugee advocates, grumpy pensioners and pretty much every single other Australian citizen.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-24/v ... d/10159424
Lead suspects are the Socialist Alternative, Antifa, Turnbull loyalists, disaffected local constituents, Labor groupies, general hoodlums, Liberal Party members, refugee advocates, grumpy pensioners and pretty much every single other Australian citizen.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
You're right about the 100% point, in most (but not 100% of) cases.stui magpie wrote:Find a lawyer who will ever say 100% to anything. It's always an educated opinion and there's always caveats.watt price tully wrote:The solicitors general's opinion does not confirm or deny Duttons ineligibility to be a sitting MP. The undertakers undertakings look politically damaging for the undertaker. It needs to go to the high court.
Here's the full decision. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... utton.html
My summary would be Dutton is not ineligible based on known facts, but there is other information not provided that may possibly impact that (unknown so can't say) and you can't predict how the High Court will rule on some of these things. So, there is risk. Not enough for the Libs to refer him, but if he wins the leadership you can guarantee Labor will keep pushing it.
As to your summary, the really critical thing is that Stevo accepts that the legal (as distinct from factual) position is not clear (see, in particular, his third proposition in paragraph 9).
Otherwise, I would respectfully point out that Stevo's advice is just that - it's not a decision. This is worth bearing in mind, especially when there are other views being floated abroad by more highly-regarded lawyers.