Coronavirus 4 - Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Moderator: bbmods
- ronrat
- Posts: 4932
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
- Location: Thailand
A mate of mine is temporarily in StKilda while they are building a new railway station in Chelsea. He went for a sroll down Fitzroy St yesterday and a woman who decided to go topless was espousing the benefits of getting Covid vaccinations.
It could work if say about 20 strippers gathered on mass and decided they would do it every day for a month and the local government banned anyone from attending unless vaccinated. The young punks who decided they didn't need it would soon fall in line to get jabbed.
It could work if say about 20 strippers gathered on mass and decided they would do it every day for a month and the local government banned anyone from attending unless vaccinated. The young punks who decided they didn't need it would soon fall in line to get jabbed.
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Correct, but they originally said it was because of suspected child to child transmission. In other words, they lied.Dave The Man wrote:Playgrounds was mostly because Mother Clubs did not wear masks at the Parks and there was no Social Distancingstui magpie wrote:Playgrounds being closed when there was no evidence of child transmission at playgrounds another example
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Well, we won't (unless it doesn't matter). Which was, of course, my point.stui magpie wrote:My view isn't that it's just about the lockdowns, but specific restrictions.
The bloke from Jims Mowing is taking action over why sole traders like gardeners who were working outside away from people weren't allowed to continue. There's a number of inconsistencies in restrictions, you yourself have pointed that out, that people impacted by them will want explained.
Playgrounds being closed when there was no evidence of child transmission at playgrounds another example
Yes there are a large cohort of people who vote on party lines and won't care, but there's also a large cohort who don't and many will be angry and looking for justification.
Again, we'll see.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Strip clubs and brothels reopen at 80% but only for the fully vaccinated. That may work too.ronrat wrote:A mate of mine is temporarily in StKilda while they are building a new railway station in Chelsea. He went for a sroll down Fitzroy St yesterday and a woman who decided to go topless was espousing the benefits of getting Covid vaccinations.
It could work if say about 20 strippers gathered on mass and decided they would do it every day for a month and the local government banned anyone from attending unless vaccinated. The young punks who decided they didn't need it would soon fall in line to get jabbed.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
How it is a Lie when it can be Transmitted between Children?stui magpie wrote:Correct, but they originally said it was because of suspected child to child transmission. In other words, they lied.Dave The Man wrote:Playgrounds was mostly because Mother Clubs did not wear masks at the Parks and there was no Social Distancingstui magpie wrote:Playgrounds being closed when there was no evidence of child transmission at playgrounds another example
I am Da Man
- ronrat
- Posts: 4932
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
- Location: Thailand
50 blokes sitting in a room and yelling at the girls "take off your mask, show us your face"stui magpie wrote:Strip clubs and brothels reopen at 80% but only for the fully vaccinated. That may work too.ronrat wrote:A mate of mine is temporarily in StKilda while they are building a new railway station in Chelsea. He went for a sroll down Fitzroy St yesterday and a woman who decided to go topless was espousing the benefits of getting Covid vaccinations.
It could work if say about 20 strippers gathered on mass and decided they would do it every day for a month and the local government banned anyone from attending unless vaccinated. The young punks who decided they didn't need it would soon fall in line to get jabbed.
They have allowed massage places to reopen here here for foot massages only. But a lot of the places don't care if you are only 4 inches as long as you tip them well. There are no tourists or very few so most of the girls have gone back to the villages.
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Can be isn't the same as Was. They admitted it afterwards, there was no evidence that Covid had been transmitted between children at playgrounds. The re-opening rules said it all.Dave The Man wrote:How it is a Lie when it can be Transmitted between Children?stui magpie wrote:Correct, but they originally said it was because of suspected child to child transmission. In other words, they lied.Dave The Man wrote: Playgrounds was mostly because Mother Clubs did not wear masks at the Parks and there was no Social Distancing
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
Much like how during lockdown 4 they increased restrictions based on a lie, then a day or 2 later had to admit the fleeting outdoor contacts were actually a false positive...stui magpie wrote:Correct, but they originally said it was because of suspected child to child transmission. In other words, they lied.Dave The Man wrote:Playgrounds was mostly because Mother Clubs did not wear masks at the Parks and there was no Social Distancingstui magpie wrote:Playgrounds being closed when there was no evidence of child transmission at playgrounds another example
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
I do actually, but this was a case of them not even getting to the contacting people stage within a day or 2 as was the required standard and them becoming so overwhelmed with 4-5 daily cases they had to ask for a lockdown to catch up.think positive wrote:do you personally know any of the poor buggers who are actually doing this, making the calls? awfully hard when every second caller gives you a mouthful and doesnt tell the truth.eddiesmith wrote:It's based around the completely unnecessary Valentines Day lockdown that cost hospitality businesses hundreds of millions of dollars on one of their biggest weekends of the year.Dave The Man wrote: Yes but I just think people will just use it to abuse Dan who was doing the best he thought for the State
Of course people deserve the truth, was it because the Victorian gold standard contact tracing team had fallen over with just a handful of cases and had to lockdown before they lost control? Did they actually **** up so badly they were calling people on their call sheets from December outbreak instead of the current outbreak?
This was also an outbreak that never spread outside its initial small group of very close contacts and had been contained before we went into lockdown.
funny, people dont want to be treated like children, but when push comes to shove they act like a bunch of 6 grade mean girls plotting the downfall of the dags! actually worse, drunken dickhead men at a losing footy game!
Calling it a lie is utter crap. You do get what the 'novel' in 'novel corona virus' means don't you? The government and DHHS have been operating with out clear and definitive knowledge of how COVID spreads across the whole pandemic and you seriously expect that errors like this won't be made? And that makes it a lie?eddiesmith wrote:Much like how during lockdown 4 they increased restrictions based on a lie, then a day or 2 later had to admit the fleeting outdoor contacts were actually a false positive...stui magpie wrote:Correct, but they originally said it was because of suspected child to child transmission. In other words, they lied.Dave The Man wrote: Playgrounds was mostly because Mother Clubs did not wear masks at the Parks and there was no Social Distancing
If people actually want some insight into the pressure that decision-makers have been working under over the last 18 months and what its like to actually make big calls with limited information and no time, go to the Victorian Ombudsman's site and trawl through the report investigating the public housing towers lockdown from last July. Then try putting yourselves in the position of those that actually have to make these decisions.
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
No doubt, but why hide the information you used to make decisions?nomadjack wrote:If people actually want some insight into the pressure that decision-makers have been working under over the last 18 months and what its like to actually make big calls with limited information and no time, go to the Victorian Ombudsman's site and trawl through the report investigating the public housing towers lockdown from last July. Then try putting yourselves in the position of those that actually have to make these decisions.
If you made sound decisions based on the facts at the time, the you have nothing to hide.
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times