Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player discussion
Moderator: bbmods
It was rumored before the Shultz deal was done that Collingwood was interested in Jack Billings from StKilda. Now that the Schultz deal is done I wonder if there is still any interest in getting Billings over from StKilda who I believe are keen to offload Billings?
Personally, I don't see much of an attraction of Billings for Collingwood. He was pick 3 in the national draft, taken before Bontempelli who went at pick 5, but has struggled to impact AFL games due to lack of pace for his size despite neat skills. I would think the likes of Macrae, Allan, McInnes and Carmichael would be ahead of Jack Billings for a spot in our best AFL team selection pecking order.
Interestingly another former pick 3 in the national draft, Patrick Dow from Carlton is likely to finish up at StKilda during this trading period on a 3 year deal. Hard to see how those two former pick 3's will help StKilda rise any higher on the AFL ladder next year.
Personally, I don't see much of an attraction of Billings for Collingwood. He was pick 3 in the national draft, taken before Bontempelli who went at pick 5, but has struggled to impact AFL games due to lack of pace for his size despite neat skills. I would think the likes of Macrae, Allan, McInnes and Carmichael would be ahead of Jack Billings for a spot in our best AFL team selection pecking order.
Interestingly another former pick 3 in the national draft, Patrick Dow from Carlton is likely to finish up at StKilda during this trading period on a 3 year deal. Hard to see how those two former pick 3's will help StKilda rise any higher on the AFL ladder next year.
Collingwood Domination. Envy of the Nation!
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:08 pm
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 33 times
I'm annoyed about this last minute request from Ginnivan to go to Hawthorn, who would see him as a ready made replacement for their aging Luke Breust.
1. It's annoying that Ginnivan isn't strong enough to try and battle it out for a spot in the Collingwood team.
2. It's annoying that Ginnivan has the potential to be a long term replacement of the aging Jamie Elliot.
3. It's annoying that Hawthorn think they can get a 3rd year player, who is a proven goal kicker, premiership team member for anything less than a first round pick.
4. Pay up Whorethorn, or get @#$%.
1. It's annoying that Ginnivan isn't strong enough to try and battle it out for a spot in the Collingwood team.
2. It's annoying that Ginnivan has the potential to be a long term replacement of the aging Jamie Elliot.
3. It's annoying that Hawthorn think they can get a 3rd year player, who is a proven goal kicker, premiership team member for anything less than a first round pick.
4. Pay up Whorethorn, or get @#$%.
Collingwood Domination. Envy of the Nation!
- Kingsofclutch
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2023 12:35 am
- Presti35
- Posts: 19938
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 447 times
- Been liked: 224 times
Will not get back to Hawthorn. Hawks don't seem to be interested. Is he cooked? We were fully into him when he was 29. Now at 32, does he fill the FF gap for a year? I'd offer a very late pick. If Lions want him gone and he wants back to Victoria, they'll take it.K wrote:How about... Gunston??!!
Wants to return to Vic. Hawks not interested... We need to buy a forward line.
He's 32. Costs $500k a year. Would need Pies to trade with biggest rival...
Is there any way this isn't totally crazy??
But again... is he cooked?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
- Newelly
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 1999 6:01 pm
- Location: Perth again.
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 14 times
hmm that might work https://www.saints.com.au/players/999/dougal-howardKingsofclutch wrote:Nobody seems to like Dougal Howard but he ran at 89% disposal efficiency across 18 games this year, with Howe 33 and Murphy under a cloud he'd be nice and cheap and only 27 years old.
Chuffed to have seen 3 flag wins in my lifetime but still greedy for more.
- LaurieHolden
- Posts: 3842
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:04 am
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 185 times
It's no ordinary day of trade period. Things work a little differently on deadline day.
Representatives from clubs will recommence discussions this morning before they all convene at Docklands Stadium this afternoon
No trades can be confirmed or announced until 3pm AEDT
A member from each club's list management team will front the media throughout the afternoon
The trade period officially ends at 7.30pm AEDT. All paperwork must be lodged with the AFL by that time for a deal to be ratified.
Representatives from clubs will recommence discussions this morning before they all convene at Docklands Stadium this afternoon
No trades can be confirmed or announced until 3pm AEDT
A member from each club's list management team will front the media throughout the afternoon
The trade period officially ends at 7.30pm AEDT. All paperwork must be lodged with the AFL by that time for a deal to be ratified.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
2023 AFL Premiers
- think better
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 4:42 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 40 times
LaurieHolden wrote:It's no ordinary day of trade period. Things work a little differently on deadline day.
Representatives from clubs will recommence discussions this morning before they all convene at Docklands Stadium this afternoon
No trades can be confirmed or announced until 3pm AEDT
A member from each club's list management team will front the media throughout the afternoon
The trade period officially ends at 7.30pm AEDT. All paperwork must be lodged with the AFL by that time for a deal to be ratified.
From the AFL site today "The AFL will bring the Deadline Day trade window forward by an hour to 2pm AEDT""
I think therefore I think - I think