The 2021 Great Big Consolidated Trade & Draft thread

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
magirl
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:27 pm
Location: Tura Beach NSW

Post by magirl »

Here we go
Side by Side
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29226
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 137 times
Been liked: 196 times

Post by Jezza »

Gold Coast bid on Daicos.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
magirl
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:27 pm
Location: Tura Beach NSW

Post by magirl »

Welcome to Collingwood Nick Daicos
Side by Side
MAY-Z
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 pm

Post by MAY-Z »

And another R3 2022 pick

4 of them so perfectly placed to try and get something from Brisbane who will need the points next season
User avatar
sherrife
Posts: 3037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 11:20 pm
Contact:

Post by sherrife »

Pick 48 from north is currently pick 39 i think, once you take out all the bids used to match FS.

So pretty awesome swap.
I would be ashamed to admit that I had risen from the ranks. When I rise it will be with the ranks... - Eugene Debs
Pies2016
Posts: 6754
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 91 times

Post by Pies2016 »

^ ^ ^

Not sure the pick swap to buy back in will be tonight. Reckon the club will look at who is left after tonight’s first round is over and then use tomorrow to try and nut a deal with another club. They may yet hold onto those futures for 12 months, although I imagine their preference would be have to have a crack around the late twenties / early thirties tomorrow night just because this crop is so even after the top ten.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

We would have used pick 48 gained from North as part of matching the bid for Daicos wouldn't we?

The AFL site doesn't even have the draft tracker like it used to.

Seriously crap.

Did they even mention the pick swap we did with North?
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
sherrife
Posts: 3037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 11:20 pm
Contact:

Post by sherrife »

swoop42 wrote:We would have used pick 48 gained from North as part of matching the bid for Daicos wouldn't we?

The AFL site doesn't even have the draft tracker like it used to.

Seriously crap.

Did they even mention the pick swap we did with North?
Fox is slower, but doing it better. Shows which picks we used, we did not use 48.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/draft/ ... ba5a60eb77
I would be ashamed to admit that I had risen from the ranks. When I rise it will be with the ranks... - Eugene Debs
User avatar
magpieazza
Posts: 2305
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Griffith N.S.W

Post by magpieazza »

Swoop ... Nope and its bloody annoying. It would be great if they put up the club picks as they change in live mode. I dont even know what Collingwood actually have bc I though we had pick 48 anyway...guessing it must have changed as we used them for ND.
Glad to see ND go at pick 4 just so Nat Edwards has to grit her teeth and bare it. Must be twisting her knickers in a knot bc she was so insistent for weeks on end that we pay full price for ND.
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 15 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

sherrife wrote:
swoop42 wrote:We would have used pick 48 gained from North as part of matching the bid for Daicos wouldn't we?

The AFL site doesn't even have the draft tracker like it used to.

Seriously crap.

Did they even mention the pick swap we did with North?
Fox is slower, but doing it better. Shows which picks we used, we did not use 48.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/draft/ ... ba5a60eb77



picks 38, 40, 42, 44 = 1651 Points

Pick 4 = 2034 Points, less 20% = 1627 Points
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 15 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

sherrife wrote:
swoop42 wrote:We would have used pick 48 gained from North as part of matching the bid for Daicos wouldn't we?

The AFL site doesn't even have the draft tracker like it used to.

Seriously crap.

Did they even mention the pick swap we did with North?
Fox is slower, but doing it better. Shows which picks we used, we did not use 48.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/draft/ ... ba5a60eb77



picks 38, 40, 42, 44 = 1651 Points

Pick 4 = 2034 Points, less 20% = 1627 Points
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Our next selections are currently 45 and 51.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
K
Posts: 21445
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 17 times

Post by K »

Jezza wrote:Gold Coast bid on Daicos.
Just be grateful it wasn't GWS (with the pick they got from us). :shock:
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Haven't found any clarification but North seemingly traded their future 3rd as part of the pick swap for Darcy (unless they held multiple) and we haven't in fact ended up with their 3rd round selection. Probably the Dogs.

Who really knows though until the media get off their arse and clarify.

Bring back the draft tracker!
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
sherrife
Posts: 3037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 11:20 pm
Contact:

Post by sherrife »

swoop42 wrote:Haven't found any clarification but North seemingly traded their future 3rd as part of the pick swap for Darcy (unless they held multiple) and we haven't in fact ended up with their 3rd round selection. Probably the Dogs.

Who really knows though until the media get off their arse and clarify.

Bring back the draft tracker!
Where do you see we have pick 45 and 51? Fox reporting 48, ABC doesn't even mention our pick trade at all...

Also, what happened to our picks in the 70s? I thought we had a couple.
I would be ashamed to admit that I had risen from the ranks. When I rise it will be with the ranks... - Eugene Debs
Post Reply