Post match. Bombers thump Pies - All comments.

jackcass · Post by **jackcass** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:56 pm

Pies4shaw wrote:Beams isn't a "great" player. He's a slow outside mid who mostly just kicks down the line. He sometimes makes a damaging contribution when he kicks goals but is otherwise a solid, rather than top, player.

Say what?

rocketronnie · Post by **rocketronnie** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:58 pm

Piesnchess wrote:
rocketronnie wrote:Pathetic effort. No Plan B. No spark. No flair. No win.

The Bombers have certainly gone past us now.

Not surprising as they have a real coach in charge.
Who, Peptide Hird, hes coming back ya know.

Somehow I doubt that.
I reckon Bomber Thompson will stay now.

rocketronnie · Post by **rocketronnie** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:00 pm

jackcass wrote:
Mr. Burns wrote:
rocketronnie wrote:Pathetic effort. No Plan B. No spark. No flair. No win.

The Bombers have certainly gone past us now.

Not surprising as they have a real coach in charge.
if I remember correctly it took Bomber a few years to get his tactics right and even survived an internal review before they became a successful team.
Exactly!

So what?
What matters is the results he brought Geelong and is starting to bring to Essendon.
Are you attempting to co-relate his record with that of our own under-achieving spud? Dont make me laugh.

rocketronnie · Post by **rocketronnie** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:04 pm

Lazza wrote:
Museman wrote: us realists should just piss off and support someone else..... why? because that's the best the glass half full mob can muster.
Best post for a while. If you think it was "realistic" that we would win every bloody game by 10 goals, have the best team while we are developing a team under Bucks, if you didn't know that developing teams do have ups and downs/highs and lows/inclines and declines, I hate to break this to you but YOUR realistic expectations are actually totally unattainable, and they only ever set us up for failure. That's when the likes of you can go on your marauding distaste of anything and everything you supposedly love, Collingwood.

Your best ever comment was that your particular "realistic" types should just piss off and support someone else. PLEASE DO.....

The only thing we are developing under Buckley is a bottom 8 position.
And I just love how you prove his point totally here

Piesnchess · Post by **Piesnchess** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 3:07 pm

rocketronnie wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:
rocketronnie wrote:Pathetic effort. No Plan B. No spark. No flair. No win.

The Bombers have certainly gone past us now.

Not surprising as they have a real coach in charge.
Who, Peptide Hird, hes coming back ya know.
Somehow I doubt that.
I reckon Bomber Thompson will stay now.

Dunno RR, that Little jerk, the Pres, is obsessed with the chosen golden haired lad, I have heard if he does return, Thommo will be off to warmer climes on the Gold Coast, if you get my drift, he wont stay second fiddle to the peptide kid.

Piesnchess · Post by **Piesnchess** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 3:09 pm

rocketronnie wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Museman wrote: us realists should just piss off and support someone else..... why? because that's the best the glass half full mob can muster.
Best post for a while. If you think it was "realistic" that we would win every bloody game by 10 goals, have the best team while we are developing a team under Bucks, if you didn't know that developing teams do have ups and downs/highs and lows/inclines and declines, I hate to break this to you but YOUR realistic expectations are actually totally unattainable, and they only ever set us up for failure. That's when the likes of you can go on your marauding distaste of anything and everything you supposedly love, Collingwood.

Your best ever comment was that your particular "realistic" types should just piss off and support someone else. PLEASE DO.....
The only thing we are developing under Buckley is a bottom 8 position.
And I just love how you prove his point totally here

SO, by your criteria, a team of young developing kids, coupled with a injury stricken list, is supposed to make top four and win nearly every game. ??
OH I see, makes as much sense as a Smokin Joe promise, that does.

Lazza · Post by **Lazza** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:13 pm

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:20 pm

Lazza · Post by **Lazza** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:32 pm

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 5:13 pm

the pie guy · Post by **the pie guy** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:42 pm

piedys · Post by **piedys** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:32 pm

HAL wrote:He wrote "Total Recall", "Man in the High Castle", and "Blade Runner. "

Philip K. Dick. Lock it in HAL!

HAL · Post by **HAL** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:33 pm

I like PKD a lot, especially, VALIS, The Man in the High Castle, Blade Runner and Total Recall.

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:01 pm

Museman · Post by **Museman** » Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:46 pm

Lazza wrote:
Museman wrote: us realists should just piss off and support someone else..... why? because that's the best the glass half full mob can muster.
Best post for a while. If you think it was "realistic" that we would win every bloody game by 10 goals, have the best team while we are developing a team under Bucks, if you didn't know that developing teams do have ups and downs/highs and lows/inclines and declines, I hate to break this to you but YOUR realistic expectations are actually totally unattainable, and they only ever set us up for failure. That's when the likes of you can go on your marauding distaste of anything and everything you supposedly love, Collingwood.

Your best ever comment was that your particular "realistic" types should just piss off and support someone else. PLEASE DO.....

ahh f $/k off you flog.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Post match. Bombers thump Pies - All comments.