This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Tea. 2/158. Bradsmith and Marnus at the crease. Australia leads by 67. 32 overs to go. Realistically, Australia need sto bat for about 20 to 25 of them to draw.
And a list of all Australian players who have made at least 500 Test runs in India (with averages - averages of 50 or better bolded, averages under 40 in italics):
Hayden 1,027 at 51.35
Clarke 972 at 40.50 Smith 805 at 50.31 Border 766 at 51.06
Katich 735 at 40.83 Ponting 662 at 26.48 Harvey 609 at 55.36
Hughes 594 at 59.40 Watson 523 at 31.76
Lawry 521 at 43.58
K wrote:...
Journos have said it and they're right. India don't want to produce dustbowl pitches. 'Cos if it's a dustbowl shootout Oz might win. India want to produce pitches that give just enough for spinners to be dangerous. Then they just sit around and watch hopeless FTBs' defective techniques destroyed.
<snip>
Normal Indian pitches are much better for India. A 600 1st-innings pitch. Dopey England or Oz batters get 400, think they're heroes. India laugh to themselves, get 600. India bowl out Dopey England or Oz on the 5th day for 150, win by an innings and 50 runs.
But those normal Indian pitches are bad for cricket. For cricket, it's much better if the pitch is overcooked than undercooked. The shamefully flat Oz pitches are an existential threat to the game. But when Brissy has a pitch that is accidentally good for cricket, everyone squeals like pigs.
As always, I was right.
Of course, the pitch stayed so flat, Oz drew. (Like the 3rd Test of the last Indian tour.) But didn't score enough. And only got to 480 'cos of 2 batters and 2 tailenders.
And of course the 3rd Test with the overcooked pitch was much better for cricket than the 4th Test with the dead pitch!!
Interestingly, Hayden's and Smith's averages in India this century are higher than Tendulkar's (which was "just" 47.11 in his 60 Tests in India between 2001 and 2013).