Yep agree with you. We blasted out of the blocks early, only a matter of time until we dropped a few games. Hell, heard some Age journos claim Geelong was the best team this yearPete 70 wrote:I’m posting what is often put forward by external commentators and sometimes people here, and in an attempt to show how irrelevant some of those statements are when you consider the season we have had .
Qualifying Final. Magpies v. Demons. All comments.
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 93 times
Oh I obviously wasn’t aware of that. I wish him a full and speedy recovery.Piesnchess wrote: Actually, in all seriousness, I heard few days ago, that Neil Balme is very sick, quite ill, and is not good at all, not sure if its Alzheimer's or something, but hes not well at all. Best wishes to Balmey, hope he can recover, he did a lot for the Magpies when with us.
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm
- Piethagoras' Theorem
- Posts: 19603
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 17 times
whattabout Degoey, Hill and McCreery? In fact, I reckon one of our main weapons this year has been our pace across the field!Mr Miyagi wrote:I wouldn’t call Noble, Markov, IQ, Moore, Daicos, WHE slow eithermattdally wrote:Agree with Mr Miyagi here. Fast ball movement is always quicker than outright leg speed. We have quality decision makers who can execute over time. That's our strength in the middle.
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
It was on the news. He has developed epilepsy, but it seems medically under control.lazzadesilva wrote:Oh I obviously wasn’t aware of that. I wish him a full and speedy recovery.Piesnchess wrote: Actually, in all seriousness, I heard few days ago, that Neil Balme is very sick, quite ill, and is not good at all, not sure if its Alzheimer's or something, but hes not well at all. Best wishes to Balmey, hope he can recover, he did a lot for the Magpies when with us.
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26202
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 94 times
Piethagoras' Theorem wrote:whattabout Degoey, Hill and McCreery? In fact, I reckon one of our main weapons this year has been our pace across the field!Mr Miyagi wrote:I wouldn’t call Noble, Markov, IQ, Moore, Daicos, WHE slow eithermattdally wrote:Agree with Mr Miyagi here. Fast ball movement is always quicker than outright leg speed. We have quality decision makers who can execute over time. That's our strength in the middle.
Yep and last season, the Cats were derided , pre Finals, as too old , too slow, and they won the GF by bout 100 points.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
- mudlark
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
- Location: Maroochydore Qld
- Contact:
One must never forget Mr Hiss. An EXPERT is described this way. X is an unknown quantity and a Spurt is a drip under pressure. Something to consider when next you want to quote the "Experts".Hiss wrote:I am shocked how many Pies fans have no clue about football, let alone understand what historical and contemporary statistics mean. I laugh and ignore some losers on this site that personally abuse other posters for offering a different view to the Mass group think delusional bile that suggests we can actually beat Melbourne on Thursday night. One absolute dope thinks we have a clear game plan that allowed us to win fifteen games this year, despite football experts suggesting the narrow margins were more a case of luck than some undefined genius. But the poster who called me a village idiot for merely repeating what football experts are saying , is a known nasty who can’t deal with the issues, rather prefers to insult the messenger in a gutless
manner. Pathetic immaturity, but I am not surprised by these halfwits. But I hope and pray I am totally wrong and we beat Melbourne. But somehow my gut tells me we won’t and can’t .
Further more, we had ,up until recently, beatenMelbourne 5 times on the trot and twice in their premiership year and our last outing, with several of our stars out and a bout of "Sickness" as it was called, surging through the club, a 4 point loss was not a bad result. I think we will win by 4+ goals and you may save this and quote me on Friday.
- Mossi
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Vittorio Veneto TV Italy
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
Back to the debate in who to leave out! Like most 106000 selectors around the country, I've been thinking about it, and assuming the tactical direction Fly and co are heading if it's not going to be too wet and showers only are forecast. With Melbourne the contested ball is key and we cannot allow the Dees to dominate. Selecting both Cameron and Cox are a key to that. I presume the first half will be a tight contested affair and the way to put pressure on the Dees backs is to have that extra tall McStay to contest the high ball and having Ginni Hill and whoever gets in there roaming the packs. The third quarter is where Melbourne and us both try and break the game open here we need speed and run, the ideal sub would be Markov. For me as much as I love Markov he needs to be the Sub!
In Moore, Murph, McCreary. Out MacCrae, Billy Fram, and Lipinski.
In Moore, Murph, McCreary. Out MacCrae, Billy Fram, and Lipinski.
Last edited by Mossi on Tue Sep 05, 2023 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
Love his answer regarding Howe.
We must remember that against Brisbane, Howe completely nullified Harris-Andrews intercept game.
Are we entertaining the prospect of using Howe to similarly negate either Lever or May?
Then, with the other Melbourne defender isolated, we get the ball to ground in our F50 where Ginni, Beau, Jamie and Bobby will get to work? If so, then we wonder what McStay's role will be if and when Howe goes forward?
We must remember that against Brisbane, Howe completely nullified Harris-Andrews intercept game.
Are we entertaining the prospect of using Howe to similarly negate either Lever or May?
Then, with the other Melbourne defender isolated, we get the ball to ground in our F50 where Ginni, Beau, Jamie and Bobby will get to work? If so, then we wonder what McStay's role will be if and when Howe goes forward?
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Ice in the veins
Getting pretty excited!
Thinking about the game, their forward line seems to be their weakness (or so the pundits all say), while our strength is arguably scoring from
our backline. Hopefully these two things can provide an avenue for us to score well.
Coach has said Cox and Cameron will play, and I don’t think they will omit McStay. He was also quiet on Howe so maybe he plays forward as a defender - to try and nullify Lever and May in the air. Seems the perfect player for that approach given his experience at both ends of the ground.
What does worry me is around the ball and at the contest. Viney is as hard as a cats head (we don’t have a player of that calibre IMO). We were quite successful last year in winning but now winning contest so hopefully the game plan can accomodate that potential shortfall.
The last think I think we have on our side is our coaches and their mental prep of the team. I think we played to our best/limit during the finals last year annd it wasn’t quite good enough to beat Geelong - or Sydney as it turned out. I think we’re a better side this year and we can and will play our best footy of our season over the next month when it matters most.
Thinking about the game, their forward line seems to be their weakness (or so the pundits all say), while our strength is arguably scoring from
our backline. Hopefully these two things can provide an avenue for us to score well.
Coach has said Cox and Cameron will play, and I don’t think they will omit McStay. He was also quiet on Howe so maybe he plays forward as a defender - to try and nullify Lever and May in the air. Seems the perfect player for that approach given his experience at both ends of the ground.
What does worry me is around the ball and at the contest. Viney is as hard as a cats head (we don’t have a player of that calibre IMO). We were quite successful last year in winning but now winning contest so hopefully the game plan can accomodate that potential shortfall.
The last think I think we have on our side is our coaches and their mental prep of the team. I think we played to our best/limit during the finals last year annd it wasn’t quite good enough to beat Geelong - or Sydney as it turned out. I think we’re a better side this year and we can and will play our best footy of our season over the next month when it matters most.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
Ffffffark. Just learned I will have to go to a delayed Father’s Day even Thursday evening. Filthy.
Will be turning my phone off at 7 and watching on Kayo.
No match day thread negativity for me.
Will be turning my phone off at 7 and watching on Kayo.
No match day thread negativity for me.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54830
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 161 times
You'll always be Frankie to me, with the Emu avatar.Piethagoras' Theorem wrote:whattabout Degoey, Hill and McCreery? In fact, I reckon one of our main weapons this year has been our pace across the field!Mr Miyagi wrote:I wouldn’t call Noble, Markov, IQ, Moore, Daicos, WHE slow eithermattdally wrote:Agree with Mr Miyagi here. Fast ball movement is always quicker than outright leg speed. We have quality decision makers who can execute over time. That's our strength in the middle.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.