Kreuzer to Pies??

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

stui magpie wrote:
King Monkey wrote:^^I'm currently having flashbacks to the man that was a better junior footballer than Glen Jackovich...... the great Lee Walker!!
Who the Wiggles gave up because they knew his knees were futterly ucked. :cry:
Still one of the most exciting footballers I've seen who didn't manage a career.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

RudeBoy wrote:Remember also that we are required to add (I think) 5 new players to our list each year, so that means 3 in addition to Treloar and Kreuzer. Also, as our young guns blossom, they will demand significant salary increases. So it's a balancing act.
Minimum of 3 senior list changes.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

I reckon this deal is happening: the signs point to us dealing Witts, to do that we must sign another ruck. Unlike other ruck chasing teams (Dogs, Dons) we've only been linked to one player - Kreuzer.

Two possibilities: either he's clearly our first choice and we'll only look at other options if we really have to, or we're very confident of signing him.

That Witts was on the outer towards the end of the season suggests we already had something lined up or at least close to.
Well done boys!
E

Post by E »

jackcass wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:Remember also that we are required to add (I think) 5 new players to our list each year, so that means 3 in addition to Treloar and Kreuzer. Also, as our young guns blossom, they will demand significant salary increases. So it's a balancing act.
Minimum of 3 senior list changes.
I thought the rule is that you need to have three live picks in the draft?
User avatar
Cuthbert Collingwood
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:53 am
Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)

Post by Cuthbert Collingwood »

^ I believe it is too, but think that can include upgraded rookies and father sons
McRae for Governor-General!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

E wrote:
jackcass wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:Remember also that we are required to add (I think) 5 new players to our list each year, so that means 3 in addition to Treloar and Kreuzer. Also, as our young guns blossom, they will demand significant salary increases. So it's a balancing act.
Minimum of 3 senior list changes.
I thought the rule is that you need to have three live picks in the draft?
Quick check..... CC is on the ball

(i) At a National Draft Selection Meeting:
(A) each Club shall exercise a minimum of 3 Draft selections (including selections forfeited under Rules 8, 10.11(b), 12.4(b), 13.4(b) and 14.4(d)); and

http://old.aflpa.com.au/images/uploads/ ... URRENT.pdf

rule 8 - F/S
10.11 - rookie promotions
12.4 - scholarship players
13.4 - International rookies
14.4 - Academy players
User avatar
Woods Of Ypres
Posts: 3141
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 7 times

Post by Woods Of Ypres »

Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Woods Of Ypres wrote:Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
I don't think Collingwood has an "Open Daw" policy with recruits.... :twisted: :P
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
User avatar
ANNODAM
Posts: 11173
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Eltham, VIC.
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by ANNODAM »

^ We used to, we had those revolving Dawes remember?
WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!

N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.

WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT!
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

ANNODAM wrote:^ We used to, we had those revolving Dawes remember?
:lol:
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Lazza wrote:
Woods Of Ypres wrote:Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
I don't think Collingwood has an "Open Daw" policy with recruits.... :twisted: :P
I'm sure Majak could force his way in.
User avatar
Pebbles Rocks
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Collingwood

Post by Pebbles Rocks »

Wokko wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Woods Of Ypres wrote:Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
I don't think Collingwood has an "Open Daw" policy with recruits.... :twisted: :P
I'm sure Majak could force his way in.
Ha ha
"You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire
User avatar
The General
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has liked: 3 times

Post by The General »

Wokko wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Woods Of Ypres wrote:Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
I don't think Collingwood has an "Open Daw" policy with recruits.... :twisted: :P
I'm sure Majak could force his way in.
When one Dawes shuts, another Daw's open.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Where did [quote]

he or she don't think Collingwood get an Open Daw policy with recruits?
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Wokko wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Woods Of Ypres wrote:Majak is out of contract, lets get him!
I don't think Collingwood has an "Open Daw" policy with recruits.... :twisted: :P
I'm sure Majak could force his way in.
Pretty sure I shouldn't laugh at that, but I did.

:lol:
Post Reply