Coronavirus 4 - Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Locked
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

What'sinaname wrote:As the unvaccinated become more and more naturally immune, we'll start to see the disease being one of the vaccinated.
Last I checked, vaccination was still more protective than natural immunity across the population because the latter is the more variable and therefore unreliable protection. However, people who got Covid and then got vaccinated have the best immuniity (though rolling the dice to get there).

So, unless new data has emerged, vaccination is expected to be the most protective and even more so as next-gen vaccines become broader spectrum.

The blind assumption that natural immunity is superior to and/or longer-lasting than vaccine immunity is a dangerous one.
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
doriswilgus
Posts: 5350
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: the great southern land
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by doriswilgus »

pietillidie wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:As the unvaccinated become more and more naturally immune, we'll start to see the disease being one of the vaccinated.
Last I checked, vaccination was still more protective than natural immunity across the population because the latter is the more variable and therefore unreliable protection. However, people who got Covid and then got vaccinated have the best immuniity (though rolling the dice to get there).

So, unless new data has emerged, vaccination is expected to be the most protective and even more so as next-gen vaccines become broader spectrum.

The blind assumption that natural immunity is superior to and/or longer-lasting than vaccine immunity is a dangerous one.
So people are arguing that it’s better to remain unvaccinated because it gives you better protection from the disease than a vaccination does?Really,some of the things you read in this forum are totally bizarre and defy all logic.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Reported in Victoria today:

Hospital: 752
ICU: 82
Ventilated: 29
Deaths: 34

and in NSW:

- 2,578 hospitalisations
- 160 people in ICU
- 38 deaths
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

doriswilgus wrote:
pietillidie wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:As the unvaccinated become more and more naturally immune, we'll start to see the disease being one of the vaccinated.
Last I checked, vaccination was still more protective than natural immunity across the population because the latter is the more variable and therefore unreliable protection. However, people who got Covid and then got vaccinated have the best immuniity (though rolling the dice to get there).

So, unless new data has emerged, vaccination is expected to be the most protective and even more so as next-gen vaccines become broader spectrum.

The blind assumption that natural immunity is superior to and/or longer-lasting than vaccine immunity is a dangerous one.
So people are arguing that it’s better to remain unvaccinated because it gives you better protection from the disease than a vaccination does?Really,some of the things you read in this forum are totally bizarre and defy all logic.

Only if they live to tell the tale!! Lol

Meanwhile I’m sure someone I know faked infection to get a 6 month exemption from getting the jab. That bad fairy on my right shoulder is saying I hope the bastard gets it!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54841
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

A good article about why more vaccinated people are in ICU's than unvaccinated.
On the face of it, it seems confusing: data shows there are more vaccinated people than unvaccinated people in ICU in Victoria and New South Wales.

Taken out of context, it can contribute to misinformation or even give an incorrect picture of how effective vaccines are.

But experts say that given the vast majority of Australians are fully vaccinated, the data is not surprising.

We take a look at the figures, and why some people are still suffering adverse outcomes despite being fully vaccinated.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-03/ ... /100800114

Short answer, there's a shitpile more vaccinated people than unvaccinated people and underlying health conditions make people more vulnerable even when fully vaccinated.

As a percentage of population, unvaccinated people are very much over represented in ICU, which means the vaccines are doing their job.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20132
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by What'sinaname »

^ in Victoria, just under 90% of people are fully vaccinated and just under 80% of all people hospitalised are fully vaccinated vaccinated. So yes, an over-reprersentation but not a very much over-representation.

I think underlying health conditions are a bigger influence on the impact of COVID than vaccination status.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54841
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

From the article
According to a recent Victorian Chief Health Officer update, unvaccinated people accounted for 22.8 per cent of people in hospital and 35.8 per cent of people in ICU, despite making up less than 6 per cent of the population.
All other things being equal, underlying medical conditions definitely have an impact, but the same applies for vaccinations.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20132
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by What'sinaname »

stui magpie wrote:^

From the article
According to a recent Victorian Chief Health Officer update, unvaccinated people accounted for 22.8 per cent of people in hospital and 35.8 per cent of people in ICU, despite making up less than 6 per cent of the population.
All other things being equal, underlying medical conditions definitely have an impact, but the same applies for vaccinations.
CHO is mixing and matching his figures. If we are still 44 days away from 95% of 16+ having their first jab, I am not sure how 94% of the entire Vic population is vaccinated.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

With today's 83 reported deaths, there have now been 1,700 deaths in Australia from COVID reported since 5 January 2022. Half of all the 3,987 COVID deaths in Australia since the commencement of the pandemic have been reported since 28 November 2021.

The various governments obviously failed to recognize that the sheer weight of numbers would make Omicron more dangerous to public health, more of an imposition on our economy and our hospitals and more deadly than prior versions of COVID - notwithstanding the number of "fully vaccinated" adults in the population by the time Omicron arrived in mid to late November 2021.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

I'm a little worried to hear about Andrews' push for "fully vaccinated" status to shift from two shots to three (for purposes of being able to participate in public life). I only became eligible to have a booster shot this week, but having just had COVID I don't think it would be wise for me to get it right away. That certainly seems to be the advice of at least some medical experts:

https://theconversation.com/if-my-child ... hot-174690
The current ATAGI advice is that you can have your booster once you have recovered from the acute infection.

But based on vaccinology principles, it would be reasonable to consider waiting at least three months after you’re well to get your booster dose. A COVID infection stimulates the immune system like a vaccine, meaning you will produce antibodies that help increase your protection against COVID.
She goes on to recommend that children wait at least a month after testing positive to be vaccinated, which kind of makes sense. The question is: will any move to make a third vaccine mandatory take such considerations into account? Or if you're in my situation, as I'm sure many are, will you have to make a choice between doing something that's not optimal for your health or others' (in terms of ensuring adequate recovery from COVID and also providing maximum protection from spreading it in future) and potentially not being able to work, travel or go to the shops?
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20132
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Don't you know. Your personal medical history is EVERYONE ELSE's business these days.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54841
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

David wrote:I'm a little worried to hear about Andrews' push for "fully vaccinated" status to shift from two shots to three (for purposes of being able to participate in public life). I only became eligible to have a booster shot this week, but having just had COVID I don't think it would be wise for me to get it right away. That certainly seems to be the advice of at least some medical experts:

https://theconversation.com/if-my-child ... hot-174690
The current ATAGI advice is that you can have your booster once you have recovered from the acute infection.

But based on vaccinology principles, it would be reasonable to consider waiting at least three months after you’re well to get your booster dose. A COVID infection stimulates the immune system like a vaccine, meaning you will produce antibodies that help increase your protection against COVID.
She goes on to recommend that children wait at least a month after testing positive to be vaccinated, which kind of makes sense. The question is: will any move to make a third vaccine mandatory take such considerations into account? Or if you're in my situation, as I'm sure many are, will you have to make a choice between doing something that's not optimal for your health or others' (in terms of ensuring adequate recovery from COVID and also providing maximum protection from spreading it in future) and potentially not being able to work, travel or go to the shops?
Simple answer to that is to consult your GP.

Having had Covid means you can be given a genuine medical exemption, registered with AIR which gives you the same rights as whatever is considered a "fully vaccinated" person is.

My guess would be that having caught Covid at the time your booster was due, waiting a couple of months before getting the booster would be best as that should then see you through Winter, but different GP's will have different opinions.

2 unvaccinated people at my last employer got Covid. One was given a 3 month exemption by their GP, the other was told to get vaccinated.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54841
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

I had a quick look, neither NSW or Victoria have any vaccination mandates for weddings, anyone can attend of any age, vaccinated or not and can dance.

Exception would be if the venue itself has vaccination requirements (eg a Pub) which makes it murky but under 18 is exempted.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

stui magpie wrote:^

From the article
According to a recent Victorian Chief Health Officer update, unvaccinated people accounted for 22.8 per cent of people in hospital and 35.8 per cent of people in ICU, despite making up less than 6 per cent of the population.
All other things being equal, underlying medical conditions definitely have an impact, but the same applies for vaccinations.
So be Vaccinated with underlying medical conditions also make a Big Difference?
I am Da Man
Locked