Post inauguration Trump:

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

^LOL!

My thoughts exactly.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

Tannin wrote:
Jezza wrote:Trump announces 'peace deal' between Bahrain and Israel
Israel and the Gulf state of Bahrain have reached a landmark deal to fully normalise their relations, US President Donald Trump has announced.

"The second Arab country to make peace with Israel in 30 days," he tweeted.

For decades, most Arab states have boycotted Israel, insisting they would only establish ties after the Palestinian dispute was settled.

But last month the United Arab Emirates (UAE) agreed to normalise its relationship with Israel.

There had been much speculation that Bahrain might follow suit.

Mr Trump, who presented his Middle East peace plan in January aimed at resolving the Israel-Palestinian conflict, helped broker both accords.

Bahrain is only the fourth Arab country in the Middle East - after the UAE, Egypt and Jordan - to recognise Israel since its founding in 1948.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-54124996

Give Trump the Nobel Peace Prize award ;)
Yer right. Give Trump a peace prize for (rightly or wrongly) claiming a role in a "peace" settlement between two countries that weren't at war in the first place. Twice!

Give me a break.

But wait, wait! There is peace between Denmark and Mexico! Yay! And no fighting at all between the USA and Canada! Or Australia and New Zealand! I claim my Peace Prize too! Better give me two prizes 'coz that's three pairs of countries who weren't fighting and aren't fighting now. And I could make more - Brazil and Sri Lanka; Japan and France!
if you saw the border security between Canada and the USA, you might not be so sure!!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

I think it's a serious oversight that no Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to a Nick's BB moderator yet.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^ This!
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29545
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 354 times

Post by Jezza »

Tannin wrote:Yer right. Give Trump a peace prize for (rightly or wrongly) claiming a role in a "peace" settlement between two countries that weren't at war in the first place. Twice!

Give me a break.

But wait, wait! There is peace between Denmark and Mexico! Yay! And no fighting at all between the USA and Canada! Or Australia and New Zealand! I claim my Peace Prize too! Better give me two prizes 'coz that's three pairs of countries who weren't fighting and aren't fighting now. And I could make more - Brazil and Sri Lanka; Japan and France!
It was tongue in cheek as my emoji suggested. I knew it would cause a stir on this board :lol:

Though, the award has already been devalued considering Obama and Kissinger have won it.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29545
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 354 times

Post by Jezza »

David wrote:I think it's a serious oversight that no Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to a Nick's BB moderator yet.
Good point.

You guys have a thankless job as it is, so may as well be given some recognition for it ;)
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^Amen to that, Brother Jezza!
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

Rule #1: If it gets the malignant narcissist out of bed it's a self-serving fraud. It really is like shooting fish in a barrel; how people keep falling for it is beyond me. As explained above: this is not a peace deal, it's an arms deal, and we know how they turn out.
The Hill wrote:Trita Parsi, the executive vice president at The Quincy Institute, says the recent diplomatic agreements among Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain amount to an “arms deal” so the UAE can purchase F-35 jets form the U.S.

In an interview with Hill.TV’s “Rising” Wednesday, Parsi said more dialogue in the Middle East was a good thing but noted that Israel was never at war with the two Gulf states and that the agreements signed Tuesday at the White House could ultimately further entangle the U.S. in the region.

“[T]he thing that worries me tremendously about this is that it’s become quite clear, this is not a peace deal, because at the end of the day the UAE and Bahrain were not at war this Israel, they’ve never been at war with Israel. This is an arms deal in which in order for the UAE to be able to buy F-35s from the United States, it had to give this concession and normalize relations with Israel,” he said.

“They’re buying it as a security guarantee. By buying a lot of American weapons, their calculation is that the United States will be obligated to come to the UAE’s defense,” Parsi added. “Instead of this actually creating peace, this seems to be something that is doing one more thing to bind the United States to the security of some of these states who themselves act quite recklessly, which then forces the U.S. to stay in the Middle East much longer…”
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/51670 ... -arms-deal
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

Donald Trump, man of the oppressed silent majority:
The Guardian on a Report by the Institute for Policy Studies wrote:The report calculated that 643 billionaires in the US had racked up $845bn (£642bn) in collective wealth gains since 18 March, when lockdowns began across the US and much of the rest of the world. The collective wealth of the billionaire class increased from $2.95tn to $3.8tn. That works out to gains of $141bn a month, or $4.7bn a day.

Over the same period, more than 197,000 Americans have died from coronavirus and more than 50m Americans have lost their jobs.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... g-pandemic

So many angry fist wavers and science deniers, so many financial losers. You know what they say: associate with Donald 'Bankrupt' Trump, and get left with the bill, even as you find yourself providing him free PR by claiming you're better off and the swamp is drained.

Has there been a more deluded cult of losers since Waco?
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54843
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 168 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

When Trump wins the election are you going to cope? You can't keep this up for another 4 years, you'll have an aneurysm.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

pietillidie wrote:Donald Trump, man of the oppressed silent majority:
The Guardian on a Report by the Institute for Policy Studies wrote:The report calculated that 643 billionaires in the US had racked up $845bn (£642bn) in collective wealth gains since 18 March, when lockdowns began across the US and much of the rest of the world. The collective wealth of the billionaire class increased from $2.95tn to $3.8tn. That works out to gains of $141bn a month, or $4.7bn a day.

Over the same period, more than 197,000 Americans have died from coronavirus and more than 50m Americans have lost their jobs.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... g-pandemic

So many angry fist wavers and science deniers, so many financial losers. You know what they say: associate with Donald 'Bankrupt' Trump, and get left with the bill, even as you find yourself providing him free PR by claiming you're better off and the swamp is drained.

Has there been a more deluded cult of losers since Waco?
Not sure - but the problem with this Trump cult is it isn't introverted - it wants to take the rest of the World with it. I couldn't care less what happens to the US (their political system is stuffed and they can all go to hell in a bucket) - but I don't want their filthy nihilism imported here.
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

^ I agree but we need to understand how this happens. People don't just become Trump fans because they are dumb. Most feel they have been pushed there, and though it may be a case of biting off one's nose..., the issues that are causing this feeling of frustration with the Democrats and politics in general, shouldn't be ignored.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^ Yes. Absolutely.

Being dumb - really dumb, dumber than dog shite dumb - does not cause Trumpism. It is, of course, a necessary precondition, but in and of itself, it is not sufficient.

You are 100% correct in saying that the Democrats must shoulder some of the blame. If they had put up a half-decent candidate in the first place - Bernie would have done, but essentially anyone better than Clinton (which is to say practically anyone at all) - we would never have been in this mess in the first place.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Yes, it was just hubris.
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

stui magpie wrote:^

When Trump wins the election are you going to cope? You can't keep this up for another 4 years, you'll have an aneurysm.
I will have been put on a ventilator by a maskless idiot before then, so at least I'll be in hospital already when it happens.

To be fair, nothing one can say short of outright denying what is a surreal deadly pantomime sounds moderate. You're really asking for a very strained, very effortful normalisation of something that is dangerously extreme. The level of buy-in needed to play down the economic, social and international chaos will be taking its own toll, as avoidance and repression do.
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Post Reply