Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6004
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Been liked: 78 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by qldmagpie67 »

Kennedy is an interesting prospect
He would come cheap and is a in and under type mid with a bigger body
Would he be good back up if Mitchell doesn’t come good or suffers another injury ?
Some guys thrive on a change of environment could he be one ?
WaggaPie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun May 02, 2021 8:14 am
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by WaggaPie »

Strong local mail that Perryman is favoring Collingwood over Port.
Magpies supporters drink at The Riv
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3775
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 151 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

^@WaggaPie As a former Wagga Wagga lad myself, Perryman (Pick #14 2016 National Draft) + Kennedy (Pick #13 2015 National Draft by GWS Giants) would please me.
Did they play together at Collingullie Ashmont Kapooka?
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Presti35 »

Yeah, I'm keen on Kennedy and also Perryman. Aged 27 and 25.

I'm assuming we're not in the race for Houston, and Peatling is staying at GWS? Are we still going to look at Hobbs?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Presti35 »

After listening to the first 8 minutes of Gettable, a few players were mentioned. Like every media outlet though its all speculation and guessing. So, Jack Macrae has nominated the Saints. I wonder, would this affect Fin at all? Will he want to join his brother? Did they grow up Saints fans? Is another club interested, or are we persisting with him?

I know this one doesn't exactly help our veteran quandary. But Todd Goldstein. Essendon may let him go after 1 season. Apparently, we had talks with him last year, but he just decided on the Bombers. Would we entertain him as a 1-year rookie selection? Giving him an opportunity to get more into coaching, but being available to play if there were any injuries to our main guys? We did this with Ben Hudson a few years back now. I know we have Steene, Smit and Eyre coming through. Just a thought.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3775
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 151 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

@Presti35 Perhaps if Goldstein possesses coaching attributes to go with his experience, it may well be worth putting a rookie contract in front of him, if he was willing to play 1st ruck in the Magoo's and assist with the development of Steene & Smit. Might be a workable solution to get around a coaching soft cap.
Would he be the best available to do that? Someone else would no doubt have a better view of available ruck stocks / role players than I do.
If Cameron was to sustain any LT injury, it'd then prove great insurance if Cox wasn't seen as a viable LT ruck replacement. Steene & Smit are a long way off competing against the comp's best rucks.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
User avatar
Jen2310
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2024 11:48 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Jen2310 »

I heard Port are offering 7 years for Perryman.

<Mod Edit @Jen2310 ^reported on previous page>
User avatar
Take_a_Screamer
Posts: 1967
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Location: Melbourne S.E.Suburbs
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Take_a_Screamer »

WaggaPie wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 9:42 am Strong local mail that Perryman is favoring Collingwood over Port.
If we get Perryman, he could form a partnership with Mason Cox and be known as Perry Mason. :lol: :lol:
Ash Johnson...you beauty
Johnson Screamer @ https://www.afl.com.au/video/931485/joh ... -epic-mark? ❤️️
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3775
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 151 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

According to Gettable, we're still up to our guts in Houston.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/7a9SzK ... 1f21f748f7

They suggest it certainly involves getting pick#12 out of GCS for John Noble.
Port is still interested in Joe Richards.
Peatling has 6 Clubs chasing his signature, including us.
We've come hard late for Perryman.

No doubt this trade period will be complicated, and we'll need to cross the streams. I've no idea, but I'll play list manager for a moment ~
I suspect Port who have chased Lukosius for 4 years might need to get us involved in order to satisfy the GCS.
So here goes ~

Collingwood: trade Richards to Port for pick#37 (483 points) >
Collingwood: trade Future 1st & pick#33 (563 points) to Port (if it was this year, it would be 1395+563 = equivalent 1958 points = top 10 points value) >
Collingwood: trade Noble to Suns + pick #37 (483 points - received from Port) >
Suns: trade pick #12 (1268 points) to Collingwood >
Suns: trade Lukosius to Port >
Suns: receive Port pick #33 (563 points) + Port pick #55 (207 points) + Noble >
Port: receive Lukosius + Richards + Collingwood Future 1st >
Port: trade Houston to Collingwood >
Collingwood: receive Houston + Suns pick #12.

Everyone gets their man, and no-one is left shortchanged in draft currency. Simples... :roll:
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
User avatar
SLORT
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 5:01 am
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 62 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by SLORT »

LaurieHolden wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:48 am According to Gettable, we're still up to our guts in Houston.
Sounds a bit...icky.

As to trading out Joe Richards, Noble, #33, and next year's first for a half back flanker...yeah nah.
User avatar
Jen2310
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2024 11:48 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Jen2310 »

Can cross out Hobbs and Stringer according to cal

https://x.com/1116sen/status/1836551182757826760
User avatar
Magpie Russ
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 9:06 pm
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Magpie Russ »

LaurieHolden wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:48 am Richards to Port for pick#37
Noble to Suns with pick #37 (received from Port) for their pick #12.
Future 1st & pick#33 to Port for Houston. (If it was this year, it would be 1395+563 = equivalent 1958 points = top 10 points value)
Leaving us with Houston and Pick #12 (1268 points) for the draft.
I like the scenario...

Port:
In: Lukosius + Richards + CFC Future 1st + Pick #33
Out: Pick #37 + Houston

CFC:
In: Houston + Pick #12
Out: Noble + Richard + Pick #33 + Future 1st

GC:
In: Port's Pick #? + Noble + Pick #37
Out: Lukosius + Pick #12

Have I got that right?

Who wins this deal? I think GC needs a sweetener.
User avatar
Take_a_Screamer
Posts: 1967
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Location: Melbourne S.E.Suburbs
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Take_a_Screamer »

^^ 🚀 Houston, do we have a lift-off?
The three-club trade that could unlock Houston's move to Victoria. By Martin Smith

AFL.com.au's trade and draft expert Cal Twomey says the Dockers' pursuit of
  • Liam Baker and Shai Bolton this year and
  • Chad Warner in 2025
are all factors in a possible three-way deal that could see Houston land at Arden St.
However note, Magpies are still in the mix with a trade involving John Noble...
It would be a small step for Houston but a giant step for Collingwood :>)

Chase for Dan Houston, including how the Magpies, Bulldogs and Blues could get the deal done
https://www.afl.com.au/news/1223163/the ... o-victoria

Gettable:
https://www.afl.com.au/video/1223078/ge ... 6619191001
Ash Johnson...you beauty
Johnson Screamer @ https://www.afl.com.au/video/931485/joh ... -epic-mark? ❤️️
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3775
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 151 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

Magpie Russ wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 12:56 pm Have I got that right?
Who wins this deal? I think GC needs a sweetener.
@Magpie Russ Maybe Suns only table pick #20, then it gets complicated. They could sweeten it with some late picks however they need to protect their points bank required for any external GCS academy pick bids.
Gold Coast picks 6, 12, 20, 26, 35, 46, 71, 80 total 5542
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
piffdog
Posts: 1335
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 35 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by piffdog »

I like the scenario - if we could end up with Houston AND pick 12 this year, losing Noble, Richards and our future first then (I think taken in the context of getting a FS next year etc) that would be a good deal IMO.

It’s invariably a 100:1 shot to happen just like that, but we should be chuffed if it does.

Add a free agent and away we go! Honouring an all-in tilt in 2025 but also chipping away at the medium term too.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
Post Reply